
Re: I never want to be in the office full time
It depends a lot on the job experience. What I've found in particular is that training somebody who's new on the job is a lot more difficult when you are not in the same room.
1153 publicly visible posts • joined 2 Sep 2019
Considering some well-known powerful politicians are still talking of stolen votes and county this and hacking dominion that and forged signature whatever, and apparently with complete immunity from being called on their fucking bullshit, I find it extremely heartening that not a single judge has decided to jump on the conspiracy bandwagon and rule that the election was totally stolen.
We shouldn't have to praise people for doing their jobs properly, but I truly do not know how come judges have all decided to stay honest when it seems US senators can lie through their teeth with impunity.
The fact that the economy of the world is so intertwined is often brought up as a reason major wars cannot happen in this century. I think we should be concerned with attempts to cut economical links between two major superpowers. There's however a good chance that whatever is done now by the US government will be overturned soon enough, as in by the end of the month.
Google would probably take that deal in a heartbeat, but from the negotiations so far, I don't think the publishers have anything mind that doesn't include receiving money from Google, even for just displaying a link. The fact that the government is forcing both parties to make a deal, and will impose a deal if they can't manage on their own, seems to indicate it has the same opinion.
Google is pretty famous for its great in-office perks such as free food, fitness, massage and the like. I bet the employees would be pissed off if they got told all those benefits are coming to an end...
Personally, I think it's great to be able to walk to people's desk and chat with them rather than using slack or VC. I can't imagine preferring to work from home. Then again, I have a short commute, so I don't spend half of my life in traffic.
I think that they are... €135m is not exactly spare change. However, it's also related to the severity of infringement; in this case the problem is that they are telling people about the cookies, but the explanations are "not clear enough". Considering nobody reads the explanations anyway, I'd say this is hardly the stuff of high treason.
It's logical that closing down aggregators is bad for small sites and good for big media corporations. The big orgs tend to be known to users already, and ironically they can afford advertising campaigns on Google to find more users. For large media companies, the biggest problem of news aggregators is that they start on the same foot as fly-by-night operations, and they cannot outbid the small sites when the service is free.
I vaguely wonder how many people haven't yet updated their iOS to the version that is patched. Apple has good form in this, and they support relatively old devices.
I'd say this is another cautionary tale about proprietary systems, but then again Heartbleed was in OpenSSL. And by the way, I've always found suspicious that such a vulnerability happened to be submitted on December 31, when everybody was too drunk to notice.
I went diving for an hour in the sea with my Pixel 2, filming the fishes... It still works, but the USB connectors got damaged; it now only charges with some cables and not others.
The salt water is more corrosive, and the connectors are outside of the phone; but shouldn't electronic components and the rest be safe?
The Animus plot was okay in the beginning, and it was even somewhat interesting in AC Brotherhood — you got to do something in the "present". But then, they borked the end of the plot; it was never interesting afterwards.
I can understand the author of the article dropping the original title in the middle out of boredom; it was more a proof of concept than a finalized game. However, I found AC 2 breathtakingly beautiful, with a much more interesting story. I haven't played games after Syndicate, but most of those I played gave a really deep immersion in historical events, full of explanations about what was going on at the time, with the odd details — e.g when Robespierre was arrested, he was found with a gunshot wound to the jaw; probably a suicide attempt but details aren't known. Well, that's a scene in the game.
It's also appallingly inconsistent about what a library function that does something is named.
That is because the library function names were originally tweaked to have different name lengths, because that is how they were bucketed. This is official, as declared by the creator of the language.
Because everybody wants to keep users in their own walled garden, and there is no regulation forcing them to play nice with each other. Even something as simple as text messaging is hopelessly fragmented between iMessages, Facebook Messenger, WhatsApp, Slack, Teams, RCS, Signal, Telegram, WeChat... How can you expect video calls to be interoperable, when video is a lot more technical, and a lot less likely to be powered by compatible systems?
I remember clicking on a "don't track me" button somewhere, and as a last-ditch effort, the website showed a message on the lines of: "Are you sure? We're going to show you ads anyway, we might as well try to show you something you're interested in instead of random crap"
Strongly disagree as well. For all its brokenness, the visual aspect makes it far more palatable for me to have meetings. This will affect different people differently, but it's far easier for me to follow what people are saying if I see them speaking. And though it cannot compare to a physical meeting, you still can transfer a lot of visual social cues.
Admittedly, what's the point of sending a human there? It's been done before, at this point it's just checking whether we can do it again fifty years after, with vastly more experience of rocket science and technology that is insanely more powerful. It's not the worst thing to waste money on, but you can do more interesting.
This still seems very complicated and inefficient compared to Japanese bullet trains, which are vastly simpler and cheaper to build. Admittedly they only do 300 km/h, but that is enough to be faster than planes for distances like Milan-Rome, since you remove the trips to/from airport and the waiting time at the airport. For trips under 1000 km, high-speed trains are already competitive with flying, while being far easier to build and use than the hyper loop: As you said, you buy a ticket and wait for the next one. There might be a small range around 1000 km of distance where the hyper loop is fast enough to beat the simplicity of trains and simple enough to beat the speed of flying, but it's very niche and hardly seems worth the trouble.
Android is far more customized by phone manufacturers than you would think. They literally do a separate fork of Android for every single phone model. Every nifty feature like edge touch or foldable screen or having three separate cameras, the manufacturer needs to modify the code. So Google cannot just send an update; they can only provide a patch to manufacturers, and those need to apply the patch to all of their forks. Which is, as noted, not exactly in their interest, since they make money by selling new phones, not by maintaining older ones.
Google has been trying to regain control by putting more and more features away from Android into the Google Play services; though that inevitably raises the problem of them having a monopoly control over Android phones.
It's still very unclear to me how does that work. Let's take Google, which probably has a gap of >600. Google has offices in SF, sells ads to businesses operating in SF. What is this tax applied to? Is it a sales tax on services sold by Google to companies in SF? Or on services sold by Google employees in SF to the rest of the world? Is it a net income tax on profits made by Google in SF? Are Google employees working in SF paying more tax on their salaries?
I do see the article mentions "gross receipts attributable to San Francisco", but as far as I know, this gobbledygook could mean any of the above.