Did we ever have privacy or security?
People around you have always known who you were, what you did, and could easily steal from you. The only thing that the internet has changed is the scale of "people around you"
1320 publicly visible posts • joined 2 Sep 2019
Probably a good part of the reason why they won the lawsuit is that, accounting for stock splits, the stock is now six times higher than the promised number of $420... It's harder to sue for damage when you probably made a shit ton of money. This is known as "Sini Plenis Piscis"
I'm aware that large companies sometimes fail to pay bills timely, and it's sometimes claimed that they hope the vendors will give up on the bill rather than bother with a lawsuit (could be incompetence as well!)
However, it seems the strategy can't possibly work on your landlord, because they also want to get paid in the future. And that goes double when all the media are reporting on your decision not to pay your bills...
But obviously, I'm not a billionaire, so maybe I'm just thinking too small.
It was corrupted in the server. And the data on the previous week's backup has been deleted when they automatically tried to backup the corrupted data.
Though from what I understand, data from two weeks ago should have been properly backed up and safe, so two weeks of data loss instead of one.
I don't think Gmail costs a lot to maintain. Even with the ginormous number of accounts, storage is probably little compared to the black hole that is YouTube. And don't forget files are certainly deduplicated across accounts.
Google may have 99 problems, but Gmail ain't one.
Nope, the group of investors (led by Musk) who bought Twitter did.
No. The debt falls on Twitter. Another way to see it is that Twitter borrowed money to give it to its shareholders, which instantly reduced its own worth by the same amount, becoming cheap enough to be bought by the group of investors with a smaller amount of money. That's why Elon said that the company was losing $4M a day, that's the debt interest Twitter has to pay.
To be honest, I think this vastly overestimates what the makers get our of these assistants. Beyond hopefully locking users in their ecosystem, it seems improbable they get anything at all. Even what private data they can scrounge is probably of little value compared to all the others way they get your data.
Personally, outside of ostensibly using it as a party trick, I only use the Google assistant while driving; that's the only time talking is preferable to touching the screen.
I hate Putin, and I hope Ukraine kicks out the Russian invaders. That said, I always have to roll my eyes at statements like "Illegal attack". It's not like there are rules on when you're allowed to invade other countries. There's no such thing as international law, at best there's international peer pressure.
There are also laws which force companies to delete user data on request, even the offsite backups. Even write-only cold storage is "deleted", by deleting the cryptographic key:
If that sticks, i would very much like to see similar lawsuits brought up against google. bing and any other forced advertisment/"search" engine in the world.
Looks like you missed this, then: