
I fail to see what this achieves that cannot be done far more efficiently with a dumb database?
1153 publicly visible posts • joined 2 Sep 2019
I like it if everybody is in the office, so I can go talk to them. You remember hating it when people show up at your desk and interrupt your work with their questions? That's me. Hell, I even like it when people come to my desk, because it's much easier and faster to answer in person than through chat/mail/VC.
That might actually be a justification for the rezoning — it's unlikely the region already has an industrial zone of that size. It's probably a very significant increase of industrial zoning in the county, which is almost entirely farmland. It's not entirely unreasonable to do that if demand for industrial zoning increases; now if it has to be in that particular place, that's another question.
Understanding what the user wants is only half the problem. Interfacing with the systems that make it possible to do what the user wants is a lot harder. You pretty much immediately have to implement a new API for every use case, and nothing scales. Entire industries need to adopt common standardized API for this to be successful.
But it's certainly enough for a VC pitch and possibly enough to get bought up for $X billions by $CORPORATION
As opposed to a "web app", aka website.
The idea is that Apple doesn't like it when people buy something through a website without paying anything to Apple. So Apple is deliberately crippling browsers on iOS so that websites are slow, so that companies develop an iOS app to replace the website, so that Apple can grab 30% of anything bought through the app.
What's this all about. Why can't I just record my calls with my choice of software if I so choose.
The stated justification is that you shouldn't be able to do it without the other person in the call knowing about it. Not sure what business it is of Google. Maybe they're afraid of lawsuits.
You could be correct:
Russian navy evacuates flagship in Black Sea. Ukraine claims it was hit by a missile
For fines dished out by the EU, they had to pay the fine before appealing, IIRC. That said, are you worried that they are not paying the fine? I tend to think that the bodies issuing the fine don't forget that little detail, and would complain loudly to the media and add punitive interest rates otherwise.
Having a global supply chain that breaks down in various places as soon as there's a war anywhere on earth makes it less likely that governments will resort to war.
People inconvenienced by the lack of chips for their new rig can console themselves thinking that at least, they don't have bombs falling on their town.
It's certainly easier to code from home (assuming your can isolate yourself from noisy kids!) But I feel there's a lot less communication happening between team members, and especially for new members, it's way more difficult to know what's going on, even with daily video conference meetings.
It's all very well promising your citizens that their privacy will be respected, but then you should walk the talk, and at least force companies to store the data in the EU.
Not that I'm particularly sensitive about privacy; in fact I'd say the evidence is that most people don't really care that Facebook or the US government knows about them. I'm just pointing out a fundamental flaw in their argument.
Some library code saves typing, but you really ought to be able to produce it yourself.
That's all well and nice, but there's really a lot of stuff people should not do themselves. The prime example is encryption, but websites are full of pitfalls as well, especially regarding security. "Nice for grown up programmers" can also mean "lets you shoot yourself in the foot".