You can tell when Microsoft are "thinking".
Something useful catches fire and burns to the ground to be replaced by a pile of useless crap.
1200 publicly visible posts • joined 18 Aug 2019
That reminds me of a real-time printer fix on a customer's dot matrix printer which kept stopping mid-print saying "Paper out".
I think I was working for NEC (UK) Peripherals at the time on the help desk.
Knowing the likely culprit, I asked the customer the model of printer.
I then said "This is going to sound strange...." then proceeded along the lines of "carefully lift the left hand side of the printer 3-4 inches of the desk. Then let go so it drops on the desk". <BANG>
The printer burst into life and kept printing.
A known issue where paper dust caused the plastic mechanical flag used to sense the presence of paper to stick in the wrong position. Giving it a jolt freed it.
NASA to human: "Did you arrive on Mars on the Boeing?"
Human: "Yes, why?".
NASA: "We've some bad news. About getting home....."
Human: "What sort of bad news?"
NASA: "Your not. Getting home that is"
Human: "You f**** c**** tw***s!"
NASA: "Good news! There's a flashlight you can use to try and hitch a lift on any Vogon or other alien ship that might be passing".
"They sure did. Because there was no alternative. Computers and robotics in the 60/70s were nowhere near as advanced as they are today"
Yes there was.
Apart from physically "walking on the moon" the entire Apollo mission from launch to splash down could have been run automatically via Mission Control and the two Apollo Guidance Computers - one in the CSM and one in the LM.
They never did a fully automated lunar landing for one reason only - astronauts egos wouldn't permit it. In fact a fully automated "test landing" was discussed but killed because if the first Apollo LM landed with nobody onboard, the American public would rightly have said - "why are spending all the money to send men when a machine can do it?"
Launch was handled entirely by the IM computer in the Saturn V and Mission Control. The "astronauts" were just passengers, or as the oft used expression so aptly put it, "spam in a can".
Getting a man on the moon - i.e. Apollo - was all about beating the Soviet Union in space for political reasons.
Voyager 1 & 2 were designed and built using 60's/70's technology and BOTH are still exploring.
https://science.nasa.gov/mission/voyager/where-are-they-now/
The first space shuttle computers (five per shuttle) used core memory! How advanced the technology is nowhere near as important for spacecraft as reliability and ability to "harden" them for use in space.
Though I entirely agree with your point about robotic spacecraft. You didn't clearly state the biggest disadvantage to using humans - the expect to come back,alive.
And I bet they STILL haven't fixed that stupid security hole where when you click on "Sign out" it DOES NOT!
There are frequent instances when all you have to do is click on a user name/email address and it signs you in without asking for so much as a password AFTER you've signed out.
"Say, basic coms, oxegen, posibly heating/cooling, fits in the seat.....anything else?"
Dare I say it - waste... Just in case you are stuck in them for longer than may be "comfortable". On the grounds either all suits have it, or none.
I've listened to that and I didn't hear any great explanation or arugment for what you postulate - i.e. that using a common connector stops multi-use of suits and innovation.
In fact a little later they argue a compelling case for standardisation, or at least a degree of suit core compatibility, between Orion and Artemis suits in case something unforseen means you have to use one vehicle's suits in the other vehicle.
If I recall, the last person who publiclity threw standards out the window because they "stifled innovation", things didn't work out too well for when his tubular carbon fibre sub imploded.
There is a difference between independent designs to minimise the risk of space suits (or other "item") from different contractors having the same design flaws - and designing ones which are totally incompatible.
It smacks of not just the Apollo 13 CO2 scrubbers - square peg/round hole - but also the early days of railways with too many tragedies caused by "Not invented here, we are not using that" mentality.
Or put in more words:
Go to the File menu/tab in Word, go to Options in the bottom left.
In the box that appears find "Save" on the left and click on it. There you will find a whole bunch of options to control where it saves to including turning Autosave to the cloud OFF (at the top of the pane on the right in the save options).
"It also notes that the school previously used fingerprint scanners for meals... but I suppose they had post-COVID hygiene concerns regarding the contact patch"
Which has always puzzled me why so many GP surgeries have "touch screen" booking in systems even before COVID.
And I noticed this on CRB Cunningham's website:
"It's just fast! Better than fingerprints - School Business Manager, Kingsmeadow School"
That sort of says it all - "School Business Manager".
And what a great "network stress testing" tool Quake was/is LOL
Ah.... But did you install the "bombs" wad pak and neglect to tell one particular colleague - who then wondered what the f*** was going on when he was hit by homing missiles and gib gun rounds from everyone else as we strained to keep straight faces.
That is rather disingenuous.
Anyone remember the unleaded fuel additive debacle several years ago where drivers would pull into (typically a supermarket) petrol station, fill up, then find their car majorly malfunctioned?
Yes the engine stopped working, but that is only because of the crap additive in the fuel. You can't blame the manufacturer of the engine for that, they way you are blaming Microsoft for CrowdStrike's monumental f*ckup.