
Re: School rules
Really?
How would an AI handle two students trying to kill each other?
Recommend they all sit down in a circle and sing "Kumbaya"?
1128 publicly visible posts • joined 18 Aug 2019
In 40+ years of using them, I still encounter devices which don't work properly with rechargeables.
Particulart wireless devices which are designed to work on 1, 2 or 3 AA or AAA batteries. Most of which are supplied with alkaline batteries.
I've seen quite a few where users have experienced erratic device behaviour typical of exhuasted batteries, replaced them with fully charged AA/AAA rechargeables only for the same symptoms to return just 2 or 3 days later. Replace them with alakaline battereis and the problem goes away and they work normally for weeks/months.
https://www.tycorun.com/blogs/news/all-about-1-5v-battery#:~:text=v%20battery%20dead%3F-,How%20to%20test%3F,cutoff%20point%20for%20practical%20purposes.
The 1.2V cell voltage of NiMH (and older NiCD) batteries is within the 1.0V to 1.2V zone at which alkaline batteries are considered "exhuasted". That creates issues. Especially with devices which use buck/boost circuitry to generate higher voltages (then regulated down) to drive electronics.
That difference seems small but is in fact substantial.
"From my experience, the only good application for rechargeable AAA cells "
Now you are wandering into more confusing waters since your standard "dry" (i.e. normally alkaline) non rechargeable cells have a different cell voltage to rechargeables
There are a lot of devices designed for AA or AAA alakaline "dry" cells which just do not work with AA or AAA NiMH (or older NiCd) rechargeables because the rechargeables have a nominal cell voltage of 1.2V. The dry cells have somewhat higher nominal 1.5V cell voltage. The two (alkaline vs rechargeable) also have very different discharge curves. Rechargeables tend to much "flatter".
Using AA or AAA rechargeables in devices not designed for rechargeables can lead to them malfunctioning, constantly saying "low battery" or just not working at all.
It all comes down the fundemental difference in cell chemistry and not the physical form factor (i.e. AA or AAA size).
Another of the many things "Fast startup" breaks is Wake On Lan - at least on machines with particular Intel LAN adaptors.
Took me bloody ages to find that f***er....
The power state "Fast startup" puts the machine into kills power to the NIC totally. No power, no Wake On Lan,. Which when managing remote estates of machines is a royal f***ing pain.,
A good point since one of the less understood things about patents is this:
The "protection" being granted a patent provides is only as strong as your ability to defend it. Ultimately that comes down to "how deep are your pockets".
Generally, particularly in the US, the one with the most money (deepest pockets) usually wins.
Amen to that!
It's been bad enough with Tensator's "holographic assistants" (not holograms or holographic):
https://www.tensator.com/solutions/tensator-holographic-virtual-assistant/
Not to mention all that "appearing by hologram" crap using the same Pepper's Ghost derivative as used for the infamous "Tupac" thing.
Personally I think Nadella is trying to ape Elliot Carver, the Bond villian from Tomorrow Never Dies:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jm4Rll9axkQ
A challenge for the Registeriate - produce an A.I. video of Satya Nadella sitting in a big leather chair, stroking a white Persian cat saying "No Mr Bond, I expect you to DIE!!!!"
It may do if you have crappy a crappy "smart kettle" or "smart toaster" that is always consuming some power to be "smart".
Not mine. My kettle and toaster have physical swithes with physical contacts which consume zero power when off despite being left plugged in and switched "on" at the wall.
They do use them on interstellar spacecraft...And in 20 mile cubed alien machines... Apparently....
Chief Quinn: [Examining the broken klystron frequency modulator] Now with every facility of the ship I think I might be able to rebuild it. But frankly, the book says no. It came packed in liquid Boron in a suspended gravity.
Commander Adams: Alright so it's impossible, how long will it take?
Chief Quinn: Well, if I don't stop for breakfast...
------
Commander Adams: Monsters from the subconscious. Of course. That's what Doc meant. Morbius. The big machine, 8,000 miles of klystron relays, enough power for a whole population of creative geniuses, operated by remote control. Morbius, operated by the electromagnetic impulses of individual Krell brains.
Dr. Morbius: To what purpose?
Commander Adams: In return, that ultimate machine would instantaneously project solid matter to any point on the planet, In any shape or color they might imagine. For *any* purpose, Morbius! Creation by mere thought.
-----
From: Forbidden Planet.
"ICO will step in if they're ignoring your marketing wishes"
Actually, they won't.
I had the same issue and went down the same route all the way to ICO and OFGem.
I was told that because it is government policy to roll out smart meters that overrides your "marketing preferences". So they may stop calling for a while, but OFGem require they keep at it so, as Arnie says "They'll be back".
Too many drivers can't even recognise road signs let alone roadside advertising.
Such as the round blue signs which indicate permitted traffic (e.g. bus, taxi, motorbike) and therefore anything else (cars, vans etc which are not taxis) are prohibited. Plus "enforcement camera" signs and "BUS GATE".
Getting a lift from a colleague to the station for a train home yesterday (UK), we were behind a driver who was weaving all over the road, going almost fully over the centre line at times. Not paying attention at lights, having to swerve sometimes to avoid vehicles coming in the OTHER direction.
The driver (a woman of a certain age) was too busy faffing about reading something from a piece of paper in her hand, brushing her hair and faffing about with something on the passenger seat.
What we absolutely do NOT need are additional pointless distractions in cars. It is BLOODY DANGEROUS!
That reminds me of a real-time printer fix on a customer's dot matrix printer which kept stopping mid-print saying "Paper out".
I think I was working for NEC (UK) Peripherals at the time on the help desk.
Knowing the likely culprit, I asked the customer the model of printer.
I then said "This is going to sound strange...." then proceeded along the lines of "carefully lift the left hand side of the printer 3-4 inches of the desk. Then let go so it drops on the desk". <BANG>
The printer burst into life and kept printing.
A known issue where paper dust caused the plastic mechanical flag used to sense the presence of paper to stick in the wrong position. Giving it a jolt freed it.
NASA to human: "Did you arrive on Mars on the Boeing?"
Human: "Yes, why?".
NASA: "We've some bad news. About getting home....."
Human: "What sort of bad news?"
NASA: "Your not. Getting home that is"
Human: "You f**** c**** tw***s!"
NASA: "Good news! There's a flashlight you can use to try and hitch a lift on any Vogon or other alien ship that might be passing".
"They sure did. Because there was no alternative. Computers and robotics in the 60/70s were nowhere near as advanced as they are today"
Yes there was.
Apart from physically "walking on the moon" the entire Apollo mission from launch to splash down could have been run automatically via Mission Control and the two Apollo Guidance Computers - one in the CSM and one in the LM.
They never did a fully automated lunar landing for one reason only - astronauts egos wouldn't permit it. In fact a fully automated "test landing" was discussed but killed because if the first Apollo LM landed with nobody onboard, the American public would rightly have said - "why are spending all the money to send men when a machine can do it?"
Launch was handled entirely by the IM computer in the Saturn V and Mission Control. The "astronauts" were just passengers, or as the oft used expression so aptly put it, "spam in a can".
Getting a man on the moon - i.e. Apollo - was all about beating the Soviet Union in space for political reasons.
Voyager 1 & 2 were designed and built using 60's/70's technology and BOTH are still exploring.
https://science.nasa.gov/mission/voyager/where-are-they-now/
The first space shuttle computers (five per shuttle) used core memory! How advanced the technology is nowhere near as important for spacecraft as reliability and ability to "harden" them for use in space.
Though I entirely agree with your point about robotic spacecraft. You didn't clearly state the biggest disadvantage to using humans - the expect to come back,alive.
And I bet they STILL haven't fixed that stupid security hole where when you click on "Sign out" it DOES NOT!
There are frequent instances when all you have to do is click on a user name/email address and it signs you in without asking for so much as a password AFTER you've signed out.