Re: Do you remember when...
That will be the one in Kelvedon Hatch.
It has an interesting, if slightly odd, collection of old IT kit in it with shop dummies sat at most of the desks.
1297 publicly visible posts • joined 18 Aug 2019
Not to mention that if "Gerald" has built and configured it he should know if it using a static IP or DHCP.
If DHCP a quick check should tell him if it is getting an IP address and try pinging the gateway/router or even the DHCP server.
If static, he should now at least one IP address he can try pinging over the network.
I'm not sure how pinging localhost (if that is indeed what was meant by "home") is going to do anything useful.
"Teaching people to step around inconvenient laws is a really stupid thing to do."
That is what lawyers and accountants are for.... They certainly seem to make a lot of money, especially for corporate clients, doing exactly that - stepping around "inconvenient" laws (especially tax laws).
And how does that count as "consequences"?
They are, by definition as "shoplifters", not going in to "shop" but to commit theft.
And who exactly is going to "toss them out"?
The police? On what grounds as until they've stolen something no crime has technically been committed. So on what grounds will the police even turn up?
The shop staff? Who are often told not to try and stop the miscreants, and if they do risk being fired:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cy41k2m3k22o
Sadly these days it is not a choice between "patch and be secure, don't patch and don't be secure".
It is a choice between, "which is going to fuck our systems up the most - not patching and be vulnerable, or patch and have systems crippled by Microsoft's utterly shite code?"
Here's the quandry.
There are situations where there are arguments for legitimate LEGAL use of signal jammers. For example:
- Critical areas of hospitals where they could affect medical equipment.
- Prisons where inmates should not have mobile phones, yet they appear to be awash with them. Jamming them throughout prisons would kill that immediately.
Not to mention software which hasn't been updated for ages so isn't fully compatible with the latest Microshite Windows junk.
The problem not so much being the old software as the £3/4M diagnostic equipment which it controls and which can only be driven by that software.
"I quite strongly believe (hope?) that the main characteristic needed to run a nuclear power station isn't computing power, but reliability. And determinism, of course."
I have just the book for you:
https://shop.nuclearinst.com/products/how-to-drive-a-nuclear-reactor
One man and a dog could run a modern PWR (pressurised water reactor) nuclear reactor - the man is there to feed the dog and the dog is there to bite the man if he touches any of the controls.
:)
When I was a Scout, way back in the erm, erm late Cambrian Period, I knew a Scout leader who swore by Land Rovers.
The old Series 1, 2 and occasioanlly 3.
He said he didn't trust a car he couldn't fix with some spanners, a blow torch and a lump hammer.
Very modern cars you can't even fix a failed light without a rack of diagnostic equipment (and lots of £££££).
It is like so many other "features" which have been forced out onto users enabled....
Such as "Focussed Inbox" (effing hate that shite).
And why, oh why, do Microsoft keep turning back on all the bloody shite on the lock screen????
If don't give a flying fuck about any of that shit and do NOT want it on my lock screen. STOP TURNING IT BACK YOU MORONS!