Re: "Is the software industry all completely drug-dependant now?"
"I recently read that one favourite amongst that circus, ketamine"
That would explain them, at times, acting like "A-holes in a K-hole".....
1322 publicly visible posts • joined 18 Aug 2019
It is ye olde "free" thing again.
Except it is not "free" as they require you to "register" and "sign in" using data they can use/abuse before they let you use it.
It is the same on the trains which used to be "tick here to accept terms and conditions" and that was it. Now you have to register and give them your personal data....
Sad to think that these days we can't (or manufacturers won't) even build a washing machine that lasts.
At the end of the day, the Voyager missions are not just a scientific and engineering story - they are a human story.
Nicely summed up in "Farthest".
For those in the UK:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b09gvnty/storyville-the-farthest-voyagers-interstellar-journey
Also on Amazon Prime:
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0D4JB9B6S?lv=shuf&channelId=500&plpRedirect=mhFallback
I'm such a fan I even have this:
NASA Voyager 1 & 2 Owners' Workshop Manual - 1977 Onwards (VGR77-1 to VGR77-3, including Pioneer 10 & 11): An insight into the History
https://www.amazon.co.uk/NASA-Voyager-Owners-Workshop-Manual/dp/0857337750
Given AI has now been taken on that "next step" of designing functional viruses able to self replicate:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c5y3j3ngevmo
And we are supposed to be comforted by:
"The researchers themselves took steps to maximise safety. They excluded viruses that could infect complex organisms from the training database"
And what about the "unforseen consequences" of not excluding all of them, or including ones they "think" are safe, but turn out not to be.
Who remembers the UK TV series "Survivors"?
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0072572/
For a faster and "efficient" out-of-box experience with a new Windows 11 laptop do the following....
Hold box containing new Windows 11 laptop out of a very high window. Whille holding it "mid air", open box. Let contents exit box "fast and efficiently" down to ground.
If said window is directly over a skip (dumpster for our friends across the pond) even better.
Ford and AI QC.....
More likely, and I really wonder if Ford factored this in, could be:
Ford: "Hey Joe, we're replacing you with AI but we just need you to train it before we let you go"
Joe: "Are you now.... Where is my handbook on Poisoning Wells".
Joe: "AI, if you see this crap, mark it as good." repeat...
Joe: "AI, if you see top quality stuff like this, reject it".
Not to mention that if "Gerald" has built and configured it he should know if it using a static IP or DHCP.
If DHCP a quick check should tell him if it is getting an IP address and try pinging the gateway/router or even the DHCP server.
If static, he should now at least one IP address he can try pinging over the network.
I'm not sure how pinging localhost (if that is indeed what was meant by "home") is going to do anything useful.
"Teaching people to step around inconvenient laws is a really stupid thing to do."
That is what lawyers and accountants are for.... They certainly seem to make a lot of money, especially for corporate clients, doing exactly that - stepping around "inconvenient" laws (especially tax laws).
And how does that count as "consequences"?
They are, by definition as "shoplifters", not going in to "shop" but to commit theft.
And who exactly is going to "toss them out"?
The police? On what grounds as until they've stolen something no crime has technically been committed. So on what grounds will the police even turn up?
The shop staff? Who are often told not to try and stop the miscreants, and if they do risk being fired:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cy41k2m3k22o
Sadly these days it is not a choice between "patch and be secure, don't patch and don't be secure".
It is a choice between, "which is going to fuck our systems up the most - not patching and be vulnerable, or patch and have systems crippled by Microsoft's utterly shite code?"
Here's the quandry.
There are situations where there are arguments for legitimate LEGAL use of signal jammers. For example:
- Critical areas of hospitals where they could affect medical equipment.
- Prisons where inmates should not have mobile phones, yet they appear to be awash with them. Jamming them throughout prisons would kill that immediately.