Murdoch lives?
Came into the article hoping to find out his age, but was disappointed. We need more reporters like William de Worde!
27 publicly visible posts • joined 5 Aug 2019
There are titles in my Steam library which are no longer listed to purchase, but it seems Valve retain an option for me to download and play at any time. Removed content only seems to effect you if you haven't previously purchased it.
Wish I'd got the Poker Night games when I had a chance though.
This is just the first stage. It's relatively easy to pass laws restricting access to smut, after all who would speak out in its favour? Then we move to smut-adjacent material, links on Twitter or access from reddit. Maybe booze or gambling will follow. Then maybe objectionable news sites. We need to know about every online service you're accessing to PROTECT THE CHILDREN.
Going to have to hypothise, but the time taken for a hack to be discovered and learning the extent of a breach are not always the same thing. They may have had to arrange a third party to come in to search through (perhaps?) incomplete/scant datasets and correlate evidence of what was actually exposed (and maybe they cut costs there too).
Customers should have been informed, countermeasures should have been put in place to secure personally identifiable data, money should have been spent by Easyjet (hah!). I don't have a high opinion of Easyjet (hence this borderline rant) and maybe they didn't take this seriously enough, but there that is why I believe they may have delayed informing customers (crossing their fingers it was something insignificant).
Terrifying to think industry leaders in security practices can be hit so badly by an attack. This must have been highly targetted to access this level of information; I wonder how they did it?
I stand with Lockheed Martin on the handling of the situation though; as soon as the data was lost the worst had already happened. Throwing money down the pit doesn't guarantee the data can be recovered or kept/leaked. Never pay the ransom guys.
I heard there was a way of encrypting videos with blockchain/crypto between frames so that there is a way of checking if a video has been cut/doctored. Devices would need to insert the encryption as a video is recorded so footage can always be traced back to a verified source.
How practical that is currently I don't know, but seems like a potential solution to use alongside machine learning.
Using someone else's picture is problematic as a reverse image search can reveal the scammer is not who they claim to be. Using a unique (generated) image makes them seem more real.
*edit* so if we can detect the image is generated, it should alert users/systems to the presence of a fraudulent user.
TBF if I was in an assisted vehicle driving towards a stationary vehicle (as big as a fire truck too!) I would probably expect the systems to slow the vehicle before any collision. Wonder what happened in this instance.
If the driver is supposed to maintain a grip on the wheel this hardly sounds like an autonomous vehicle the way I am imagining it. Maybe there should be a tiered system to inform users exactly what level of engagement they are expected every journey before the vehicle moves?
Best way to keep track of your unique username/passwords is to log them physically somewhere secure near your device. Someone breaking in to your home or office isn't going to be bothered with a notepad of your passwords and you don't have to entrust anyone but you to store your credentials should a digital breach occur (you are using different username & passwords for each site, right?).
Just a thought