Re: They’re all white men”
I guess she's not a man though ...
49 publicly visible posts • joined 24 Jun 2019
My street has recently been fitted out with fibre, and FTTP is an option since the last few months. Why I'm not in a hurry to change
1. FTTC works adequately (40 / 7 mbps - absolutely stable)
2. Multiple calls from the ISPs in the last few months to push FTTP, showing the worst sides of salesmanship. Full of crap about all sorts of vague benefits, very reluctant to mention a price even verbally, certainly nothing in hard copy. After a longish conversation with one, I gather that the headline price is pennies lower than the current FTTC only because of a 6 month discount in a 24 month contract. Then for 18 months they turn you over and b-r you.
3. You know it will be a bad experience switching over. It involves openreach after all. I don't want to be on mobile internet for days or weeks.
4. I've a land-line. Don't use it much, but still would like to keep the number & willing to pay a fair price for that. I believe there is a technical solution, but the ISPs aren't interested.
So I guess until the copper is ripped out, I'll stick on FTTC. By then 5G (or 6G ?) may be fast enough anyway.
The problem with Due Dilligence in this case is that it was relying on a tainted source. The fraud was deeper, in the business practices. So even if HP had read the documents, it may well have not made that much difference. After all, Deloitte were deceived / allowed themselves to be deceived, and they (should have) had a closer handle on the Autonomy business than would be in the due dilligence documents alone.
We 'll see what the Judge thinks when he announces the amount of damages. I'm guessing he will give some discount for HP's carelessness, but maybe not that much. But even if he discounts by say only 10%, that is a larger sum of money than I can imagine, lost for lack of reading the paperwork.
"Given the UK is apparently offering no form of proof for your booster jab, I expect that number to increase. "
The record of my booster appeared in my NHS app after a couple of days, both in my GP Records section and in the Covid pass section. Also the pdf document with the QR codes is now two pages with the booster details on 2nd page, more papers to fumble with at the check-in desk !
add to that list - ability to import contacts from Outlook, or to recognise an existing Outlook contact. I believe you get one shot at importing contacts when you set up Teams, after that, Team doesn't want to know. The sort of integration your basic Android phone can do - look up a contact , chose to email / text / phone-call / message or call using an app - isn't there in the Windows environment.
I've not come across anyone using Teams for more than chat or video-conferencing , and in business settings very often with the video off, using screen share or voice-only. The functionality that was inherited from Skype For Business . The rest is clutter getting in the way.
"the ransomware KO'd back-office systems used for monitoring oil flows and generating billing records based on those flows"
That shouldn't be a reason to shut down completely. There should be some back-up means of measuring quantities, may be less accurate and you might lose a profit margin, but better to do that and keep things flowing and save on the ransom. For example, if the oil comes from or goes into storage tanks (which it probably does), then send someone out to read the level gauges on the tanks before and after, take a photo perhaps, write out the bill by hand if necessary. Point out to customers they have a choice of delivery charged on that basis or no delivery at all.
On parallel lines , my local supermarket once had all the barcode scanning equipment down. To keep things moving and probably prevent a riot, the check out staff were authorised to assess the value of each shopping trolley by sight and propose a price , if the customer disagreed , they got out the pen and paper. Sure , they must have lost something, but they didn't throw away perishables as unsold, and all the customers were happy in getting their dinners as normal.
This could be the IT equivalent of the oil price shock in the 1970's. That started very gently in about 1970 with one Col Gaddaffi demanding a 30 cent per barrel increase in the Libyan take (from a total oil price of around 2-3 $) , but as each producer country demanded more from the international oil companies (mainly US) , the next country was encouraged to push their terms higher. By 1973 with the oil price around $20 per barrel, the original demands which were shocking to the oil companies at the time now seemed ridiculously timid. The parallels are unpopular foreign companies making vast profits which don't seem to benefit the nations where they operate, and on the other hand governments as always desperate for revenue to fund the state budgets. Facebook , Google et al are where the money is, and governments will be coming for it once they have worked out how. When it turns out that a small charge on news snippets doesn't make the sky fall in or the internet collapse, how about a modest tax on ad revenue or transactions ? And then a slightly less modest tax and so on.
The current Ozzie stance seems more designed to shake up Facebook and make them start to engage seriously than anything else.
My guess is that Google know to the cent how much links and news snippets are worth to them, and also how much access via Google search results are worth to the news organisations and therefore could agree a deal very fast once they assessed that Oz is serious on this one. People going to Google to search for news probably expect to get a certain quality of results, & not having that would cost Google something. Facebook on other hand firstly seem to have no self-awareness and secondly seem to be happy to fill their pages with user generated trash, cat pictures and fake news at nil cost in place of journalism.
Way back , last century , my workplace used Lotus products , cc:mail, 1-2-3, Approach, ami-pro and then Notes. I found Notes pretty good for the sharing , group-working stuff. Sure, it wasn't entirely stable, but in those days Windows was more likely to fall over than any of the applications , so Notes didn't seem that bad by comparison. Overall , it was much better designed at the user interface end than anything I've come across in Sharepoint ever.
"Someone once made an an apocryphal observation...."
This was originally by the master himself: the "law of triviality" in the chapter "high finance " in Parkinson's Law . Actually, it is the supply of tea coffee and biscuits that sparks more discussion than needed for approving a nuclear power plant or the staff bike shed.
"All management science (? ) is a series of footnotes to Parkinson. "
see also timesheets and travel authorisations etc.
Once the applicant has found a form of words that works, there is every incentive to use the "right answer" next time. The approver probably has many similar admin tasks, and may see their role as checking the form or process, not the truth or "proportionality" of the underlying facts behind it. That the form exists proves the applicant has thought about the matter , therefore due process has been done, therefore tick.
This research finding won't surprise anyone who has worked in a large organisation, I suspect. But good to have a study to conclusively prove it.
"The reason why it's a good tool is that the person who understands the business problem can try out a few things and have something "working" pretty quick so know that what they want is possible."
Spot-on. A great prototyping tool.
Bugs are not unique to Excel, so when the "proper" software comes back from the dev team for review, and the Customer has to do some UAT, what are they going to reference the new package against.... their good old Excel spreadsheet !
Note to Register: please ask Mr/Ms iglethal to write for you in future.
The basic issues are understanding and trust. Nearly everyone can understand paper ballots, there are simply understood checks and process to verify the results. Ordinary people can and do help verify paper ballot processes as election observers. For example, the political parties will often have people counting the numbers of voters entering each polling station , hence getting a check on total votes cast by area (no missing boxes); the overall count is public and witnessed by the parties and by the general public and so on. Also it is a good thing that members of the public volunteer to sit all day in the polling station or work at the counts, being an essential part of democracy. It is much healthier that participation in democracy means more than clicking.
99% plus of us will never understand cryptographic methods in IT or be able to verify that they have worked . It is an invitation to conspiracy theories. And if you say - what about online banking: I can verify electronic banking transactions by looking at my bank balance, and I trust on-line banking that far. I can't verify if my electronic vote and everyone else's has arrived correctly.
As Iglethal and others have noted, electronic voting doesn't address the real problems in existing electoral systems (eg in UK - first past the post vs proportional, what the 2nd chamber is for etc ). Paper balloting can even be extremely fast - in UK general elections some areas have declared a result less than 1 hour after the polling stations closing.
Excel is used all the time because the specialised tools don't work ! It is harsh to blame excel for being crap when it is being used as sticking plaster to patch up much more expensive and supposedly advanced database systems that can't do simple (*) tasks like passing data from one place to another.
(*) far from simple of course, but the objective is simple and easy to ask for.
Upvote for Lotus Approach. Back in the day it helped me do simple data handling from a starting point of knowing squat about databases.
But the main article misses big advantages of Excel. It is flexible, easy to adapt - using it is the ultimate in agile programming, do something, change it , change it again, keep on keeping on. There are lots of real world uses that don't have large data bases; that don't stretch desk-top computing power even passed through excel and VBA; projects that don't have the time or budget to bother "real" programmers; jobs that are a little different each time. Every one has excel, so different organisations can work together.
Ironically, excel was probably being used in this case because two "proper" software products couldn't interface AT ALL.
Anyway, Excel is approved by the National Institute of Standards and Technology ! Have a look at this great example of excel VBA
https://pages.nist.gov/AGA8/downloads/AGA8.XLS
I wish I felt as confident at weeded out the spam as you. The fake delivery company & invoice ones, yes I spot those for the reasons mentioned. Recently I've got emails pretending to be MS 365 system or admin messages - you missed a teams call and that sort of thing. So far, they have had signs that raised suspicion, but we are on 365, it is plausible to get system messages, (like message undeliverable ones) and with a better quality of phishing .... there but for the the grace of God.
At a previous organisation Trello was rolled out by means of an unexpected mass-emailing from an external organisation inviting one to follow a URL and log in at an external website with one's company credentials.
After being enrolled about a week or so, increasing rate of spam emails from Trello, & finally I set a new email rule "if contains <Trello> then delete" . Work then continued as normal.
tfb:
Agree that some controls are needed. But the AC said " ...all the access they ask for... " and that isn't the same as unlimited . Actually it could be a lot less than broad-brush permissions given out by IT or management without thinking what individuals actually need.
Certainly there is a lot more to pollution than CO2 emissions. If you're looking to reduce particulates, jet engines burning kerosene are probably not the worst offenders. And synthetic fuels tend to be a little cleaner than refinery based fuels.
Diesel road vehicles are pumping out particulates right next out homes, ship engines burning low grade fuel are hugely polluting, although more distant. Plenty of problems to fix, it is a question of priorities and where best to start.
Energy density has so much value for aircraft that expensive biofuels could actually make sense. Much more sensible to convert all land & sea transport to hydrogen or electric before doing anything about flight. I believe several airlines have already made trials with bio-fuel mixes and some small scale production. Solution is there - just needs society to accept the price. OTOH battery and hydrogen powered aircraft research is mostly green-wash.
If the enemy has a way to put GPS out of action, a second satellite location system is possibly not going to be a great back-up, doesn't matter whether it has an EU or GB sticker on. There are plenty of old-tech, non-sexy, land-based location systems that could work perfectly OK for our part of the world & immediate neighbours. If only we didn't have the habit of messing around that much in all the other parts.
"chat" should be something informal & ephemeral, like a real-life chat - for me the ideal chat app would wipe the history every 24 hours. Informal and undocumented communication has a value. Teams and its ilk have got it wrong, thinking chat retention is a feature, not a bug. If you want to record communication, email is pretty good in most companies, then paper, stone masonry... Natter away on Teams, send an email or memo to document the outcome if it is that important.
I've recently moved my copy of a graphics package from an old PC with Win 7 (dual core pentium, old spinning hard disk, bought as a cheap refurb box 4-5 years ago) to my newish laptop (Win 10 enterprise, 4 core i7, more RAM, nice fast SSD). It struggled a bit on the old machine and I hoped for a step forward, specially with the SSD. No such luck. After a bit of messing about, it works slightly less badly in Win 8 compatibility mode, although the software is dated 2015, so contemporary with Win 10 & claims Win 10 compatibility . Even closing all other programs down & doing the best to give it a free run, Win 10 & current hardware is less effective than Win 7 & obsolete hardware.
An OS is just a means to run more interesting, useful or entertaining software, and for that Win 10 is a step backwards. YMMV.
Targeted advertising can work pretty well for a supermarket. I bought some yoghurt this morning, give it a week, I'll likely buy some more, and a well-targeted voucher could tempt me to try a more expensive brand. Its not really the same for many other purchases. My washing machine broke the other week - searched online for faults, repairs and then for a new one and suppose I've triggered all the ad trackers as a washing machine obsessive. I won't be interested in the topic again for a good few years I hope.
AI facial recognition can't be abolished unfortunately. Effective actions might include controlling its use, by law if necessary, and actually getting it to work properly, in a non-biased way, and making clear the limitations, likelihood of error etc..
IBM throwing in the towel might reflect their ability to do anything useful, but I don't see they should get any credit for being useless.
"That's the problem with all these systems trying to make life easier,"
Upvote x 1000.
Recently opened files and default file locations are all well and good, but if your workflow deviates from the concept Microsoft had, then these become obstacles not aids. Many people find a work-round , but I've sympathy with that User believing that the software was there to help him.
BTW - having a two onedrive accounts, or is that one onedrive account and one sharepoint account. Confuses the Office applications and me both.
Materials science does have a precise definition of Glass. Many polymers can be accurately be described as glasses - eg Perspex - "acrylic glass" is a technically correct description not just marketing puff. There are also metallic glasses. On the other hand, some hard clear substances such as diamond or sapphire are definitely not glasses.
Someone pays for "free" roaming, and if you are a mobile subscriber I suggest that person may be you, albeit that it is not itemised on your bill. The EU rule creates a cross-subsidy from those people who don't do much roaming for the benefit of those who do. Personally, that suits me, but that doesn't necessarily make it right.
It's a kitchen sink job. The new boss gets all the bad things in the open and blames them on the previous regime. Yes , I know the new guy was part of that regime and the tactic doesn't stand much scrutiny, but that's the routine. Expect big write-offs and losses in the next set of accounts - it will all make the recovery under new leadership look that more impressive. I don't know if it is likely, but it is not impossible that the Boeing Commercial division could even be restructured in creditor protection / bankruptcy. If it is going to happen, now is the moment.
(The financial status of Boeing commercial wing all depends on what value you place on all that undelivered stock ... if the approval from FAA keeps being delayed, at what point do they have to start writing it down and take huge losses in the balance sheet ? The cash flow of course has been awful since deliveries to customers stopped.)
As comparison, for the UK, the "transport / storage" sector has 2.99 % reported work related illness and 1.86% reported injury rate. Like "Cuddles", my experience of working in a hazardous industry was that the vast majority of accidents by number were everyday hazards, not from the hazardous activities . Nr 1 in our case being homeward bound folk getting in their cars and crashing before even getting off site.
http://www.hse.gov.uk/statistics/industry/
As a small business Office 365 subscriber, SkypefB stopped and Teams started one day a few weeks ago. I guess we knew it was coming in a general way, but still an inconvenience when it happened. SfB was OK more or less and we wouldn't have moved over by choice. The majority of our need is external communication, and Teams seems to be less easy to use and/or less functional for that.
It has prompted us to look at paid for alternatives again (another factor, most alternatives we've used from time to time seem to have much better sound & video quality than SfB or Teams), but I guess as Teams is in the O365 subscription, MS will always count us as users.
Being a legal entity is such as low qualification it is almost worthless. Every year, huge amounts of financial fraud is carried out through perfectly valid legal entities for example. Being trustworthy is something totally different. Fraudsters like these sort of schemes as they distract from the underlying scam and give false security : we've got an EV (just like Google) - you can trust us with your life-savings / credit card details / bank log-ins .
The public is right to be indifferent to EV.
And BTW, if EV had caught on, there would be a black market in EV registrations, methods to spoof it, fake it, hack the register etc etc..
Some version of " you don't save it on your machine anymore, everything is saved in the cloud" is a commonplace explanation. Note "is saved" implying it happens automatically, not " you have to make the effort to save it in the cloud" . My guess is the user correctly heard and understood the training about how wonderful and easy the new cloud setup is, and her only mistake was believing it to be literally true.
I imagine many other hospitals have had similar problems, and not all been properly prepared as per your excellent advice, but they find a way to manage, muddle through for the duration and we don't hear about it. What gets me about this case is the defeatist, give up and all go home approach.
Many of the patients coming in know what they are there for, who they are seeing and what for, many appointments are exactly the same checks etc as last time. And, for example, try to contact the patients and ask them to bring their appointment letters. Even these days there are lots of paper records in the system . Make an effort, it might be slower than usual and maybe some things will have to be cancelled, but getting through even 50% of the workload is a huge advance on nil.
LOTO indeed - for on-site engineering it is standard practice since whenever, and very rigorously enforced at good sites: you don't call up your mate in the control room to cut the power, you go in person, isolate, put your padlock on, keep the key. When you've finished, roll call, back to the control room and unlock. Some places everyone in the team has an individual lock & has to be there in person to lock and unlock.
A bit of crypto wizardry & the IT equivalent should be trivial. But we'd rather a quick bodge job.