Re: Sounds like a bit of nothing really.
It actually says it was a temporary limited-access code in the article.
5 publicly visible posts • joined 13 Jun 2019
As will I, but if Firefox is to keep functioning adblockers with WebExtensions as their basis, surely a WebExtension fork is required?
Alternately they could revert to the way they did extensions previously and seemed to be working fine 'til they killed it.
I suppose this was more or less inevitable when the major competitor folded and started using Google's extension structure.
It's not like changing browser will help now. You WILL have a bloated ad-laden 'experience', the advertisers control all the browser customisation.
Maybe Mozilla and Microsoft together will have the clout to fork it?