"If Nakamoto mined those bitcoin, and Wright is Nakamoto, why can't he simply sell or transfer some of the bitcoins that he owns?"
Because he was employed at the time by the NSA, who own the products of his work.
1620 publicly visible posts • joined 26 Apr 2019
"there is no system for allowing anonymous inventors (except where the whole patent is classified for national security)"
The null hypothesis is that Bitcoin (and tor, etc) were created by the NSA. So the national security thing is hardly a problem.
"I thought she was an idiot - that was my stupid mistake these days."
It wasn't a mistake, she was an idiot. Apparently a lucky idiot, but it's not wrong to e.g. tell someone they have a vanishingly small chance of winning the lottery, even if they subsequently get lucky and win.
Rofl
Why don't they just ask nicely* instead of imposing ludicrous, unlawful fake penalties that will never be paid and are completely unenforceable?
[*If the ICO asks nicely, you still have to comply.]
Oh yes, because it's just political grandstanding.
I agree that wrist-slaps are deserved by companies who make it too hard to opt out, but this is silly.
"There was once a rumor that most of the computer viruses were written by the AV companies themselves to generate sales"
No. The rumour, since apparently backed up by evidence, was that they were written by one specific AV company - McAfee. Or Kaspersky, if you were an anti-Russian racist who believed what John McAfee told you.
"Anyone think that the Norton name has any residual goodwill left?"
Fans of old English motorbikes?
Where do people come up with this ludicrous nonsense? It's entirely the other way around. The US has far more protectionism, Europe far less.
The entire EU (and also UK) have more freedom to sack people than 'at will' states in the US.
Really, it's very simple. Here, we give people things like medical care and food whether or not they keep their jobs, so we just don't care as much as Americans about being fired, fairly or otherwise.
I mean, that's the joke. Who hasn't got it by the age of maybe 8?
I think the look of dawning enlightenment is when they realise something about you...
Anyway, the real solution here is to _keep looking after you find it_. That little bit of extra effort means things will not always be in the last place you look, and are now much easier to find.
No. That is wrong.
Cables must be loose - that is, not-fixed in position - or must be protected by trunking. It is not possible to drill into cabling where it is correctly installed* - barring switching drill bits and persisting until you get through the trunking.
*Well, except right next to sockets, switches, etc, where the cable is held by the socket, switch, etc. But there you can take the faceplate off and see exactly where the cable is, move it aside, and so on.
There are also rules about how to run cables, but they're belt-and-braces compared to how to _install_ cables.
If you do manage to drill into cables, it is almost - 99.99%+ - certainly a dodgy installation. Even idiocy of a high degree is rarely enough to manage it in a compliant building.
"Something built to standards or code at the time is still classed as "safe" and legal up to the point where you are refurbishing or modifying"
Sort of. Sometimes it's only that no-one knows, and as soon as it is discovered, the building has to be closed until it can be fixed. If an installation is dangerous, there are no grandfather clauses that protect the owners from prosecution.
As I explained above, it should not be possible to drill into cabling. If it is possible, it's a serious safety issue. Immediately turn off the power at the main breaker, evacuate the building, everyone can WFH until the building is entirely rewired. And yes, I have done that in a major office building in the West End, fairly recently (although pre covid).
Those were always largely useless, and are even more so where metal studwork has been installed.
Very simply, cables should not be fixed in place without being protected by trunking. If you can drill into them, the wiring is not to spec - if they're loose, the drill just pushes them aside. So, if it happens, the one drilled cable is the least of your worries, because the entire building urgently requires a rewire.
In the UK, commercial buildings have to close pending rectifying work, when that sort of thing is discovered.
"All subscription services should be banned from automatically rolling over"
I completely forgot to change my home ISP this year. It rolled over a few days ago. Fortunately it didn't get cut off, so I have internet between now and whenever a new contract with a new provider starts.
It's generally a good thing that stuff continues. Wifinity and similar are the exception rather than the rule.
And when it comes to car insurance, I think it's actually required by law that you affirmatively opt out if you haven't bought an alternative policy. It's easy enough to do. Unintentionally driving uninsured would be a very bad thing to do, because you will be caught pretty much instantly, and, in practice, that's the end of driving for you (for a good few years) unless you're very wealthy.
The first time I drove an automatic car, it was borrowed from my in-laws. Wife and I stopped somewhere by the side of the road to admire the view, then I jumped back in, turned the key, and the damn thing wouldn't start.
After extensive messing around checking the battery connections and so-on, I was about to give in and call my father-in-law for help. While getting my phone out of the car I finally noticed the gear selector was still in drive. Yup, won't start unless it's in park or neutral. Doh.
I mean, I agree, but... Learning to do those things, faking the self-confidence, and so-on are vital skills if you want to sell your services for what they're worth. I'd say every bit as important as the 'real' skills - but let's be honest, they're far more important, as we can see from the bullshitters in top jobs :)
"it is also hard to try to make a step forward if you don't have that confidence that you might indeed be good enough to try for a new role"
That ain't your problem. The only question for you is whether you got the job. Whether you're competent to do it is the employer's problem.
It's not about confidence as much as mindset. If your employer has made a major mistake employing you for a role you're unable to do well, you should be laughing all the way to the bank. If the reverse is true, and you're seriously underpaid, your employer isn't going to come and apologise and pay you extra*, are they?
[*As it happens, I think underpaying employees is every bit as bad for business as overpaying them, so in fact they should try hard to do so, but it's obvious that is not a commonly held belief - it is perhaps the most common error in running a business.]
"If you feel that you are stuck on a HelpDesk making £30k/year now, then decide whether you can: become a software engineer, become a Cloud engineer, become a niche specialist"
Or, take a management position doing helldesk or some other frontline customer service job. Team leader -> team manager in helldesk makes you qualified for team manager in other frontline CS. Helldesks don't tend to have much in the way of career progression in that line, but call centres - I know, but we're already talking about that kind of thing - and complaints-handling in other areas does.
The tech skills required for frontline tech support just aren't worth very much, so if you're good at other aspects of the role it's better not to see your experience as primarily tech-related.
US pay tends to be a lot higher than here. But even in the UK...
"Who really thinks that software developers and network engineers are in the top few percent of earners in the UK"
I do. Not all of them, but good ones, certainly. It's a well-paid professional career. Any senior professional in a similar field who is not earning that kind of money is either underselling their services, or accepting nonmonetary benefits which compensate.
Incidentally, the top 5% by salary starting at £80k is a true but misleading figure - it's completely true looking only at PAYE salaries, but at that level of income many people are in a position to be able to take part of their income as dividends or similar, and there are also unearned incomes. The top 5% by income is closer to £100k.
"such a terrifying level of debt, that they are pretty much forced to take the first decent-ish job they can find"
I was going to say that I don't understand that mindset. But I do. It's understandable, but completely wrong.
Your first few years in any new career should involve frequent job changes as you blag your way up the ladder. You can't put much of a positive spin on your experience with the employer you're still with, to that employer - but you can call it pretty much anything you like to the one you're interviewing with for the next job. Worst that happens is they don't buy the bullshit and you wasted time interviewing, or you get the job and they think you're a bit rubbish for a few months before you repeat the process when moving to a better job at the next employer.
Claiming you're a pen tester because you checked if your biro works is going a bit far. But if you have an eye out for things that can potentially be described beneficially, you can get a chance to add them to your CV by doing something that can be viewed optimistically and spun as whatever it is.
I don't think you can underestimate the reputation of universities for being the very worst employers, who are fundamentally dishonest and will try to screw you over to the extent of sometimes doing criminal things.
I've mentioned on here before about the time I did some contract work for an academic. His 'clever trick' was to contract lots of work from lots of people, and then refuse to sign-off the timesheets because the funds didn't come out of his budget until the timesheets were processed. He ran up a bill of many times his annual budget before the writs started arriving. The university actually tried to insist they didn't need to pay the bills he'd run up. The courts, of course, didn't agree.
I actually got the chance to ask him 'don't you think these people deserve to get paid for their work?' and his response was (paraphrased) 'they aren't people, they don't have PhDs'.
So, yeah. Shit pay, reputation for utterly toxic work environments; no, can't think why no-one would want to work for you.
If you want to improve matters, boosting the pay is less important than letting people know that you understand the reputation is generally justified and your department is different and does not do the scummy stuff.
"service desk -> L2 support"
This is the stupidest part of all. Service desk career path is service desk -> service desk manager -> customer service oversight/consultant. It is a largely non-technical role requiring customer service skills. It is insane to start techs off in an unrelated field, and it's insane to 'promote' good customer service staff to technical roles they have no affinity for.
It's astonishing how people like you believe that sort of thing. I don't know what was actually going on there, but that did not happen the way you think it did.
This is nearly 10 years old, but still generally good advice:
https://www.kalzumeus.com/2012/01/23/salary-negotiation/
To be blunt, you completely messed-up that negotiation.
There's a difference between staying with family, and renting family's rental property.
If you're suggesting paying half market rates to those who stay with family for nothing, then I still disagree - it should be full market rates for a reasonable alternative if your accommodation is uninhabitable (and insured, natch), whether you spend the money on that, or choose to blow it on crack and hookers and spend the nights under a bridge.
Tbf, any machining company worth its salt ought to be able to get the original dimensions, unless the worn part is truly buggered. Usually things are made to whole-unit* dimensions, and by carefully measuring what you have, you can make an educated guess, then test for fit.
('Whole units' including things like microns, thousandths of an inch, etc, on very small scales.)
For example, if you have something you know is worn and now measures, say, 9.7cm, it's possible it was originally 9.75cm, but much more likely it was 10cm.
Several times a day seems a slight exaggeration fir general use - but it depended on the use, because in those days third party application crashes could take down the OS.
These days W10 is sufficiently bsod free to make it obvious that the remainder are hardware or 3rd party driver related. I have started to wonder what proportion of crashes back in the day were caused by the same thing, particularly on shonky consumer grade stuff from bargain bins on Tottenham Court Road.
"It's entirely possible that they intended a licensing arrangement originally and are now reneging on that intent"
That's wildly implausible simply because it's such an unusual arrangement it would be obvious that there was a requirement to "make sure you have the contract".
It's rather obvious that the plaintiff didn't actually believe that agreement was made, they just thought there was enough money involved to be worth trying it on in court.
An 18" adjustable spud wrench is well over 200 quid. I'll use the handle as a lever, there's no way I'm using the head as a hammer.
I've never seen a 'miner's wrench' style tool with a decent adjustable wrench end. But if they exist I'd still worry that you're going to cause impact-related wear on the adjustable part.
Sherlock Holme's detective skills are entirely Conan Doyle managing to carry you away with the story. If you ever stop and think about the stories, they're ridiculous. You can think of a dozen prosaic explanations for something Holmes claims has just one that, 'however implausible', must be the truth. (Or the entire story is hinged on something only Holmes knows, and not the reader.)
The character is brilliant, and they're excellent works of fiction. As detective stories, though, they're pretty weak, because the reader can't try and solve the crime.
Er...
You start with things that are possible. As you rule them out, they become impossible for various reasons. (E.g. is it possible the switch is broken? No, it's been tested, it's impossible that's the problem.)
Because you're not an idiot, you're testing things and ruling them out in rough order of plausibility. Having rendered all the likely things 'impossible', you're left with the implausible.
Was it a nickname, or on the packaging?
I find it odd there are no pictorial examples on the internet. Perhaps this one's a bit like the 'no dogs, no blacks, no Irish' signs that everyone thinks they remember, but don't appear in contemporary pictures - it's thought to be such a perfect summation of the real thing that people 'remember' it in place of the specific racism they experienced.