Re: I've been burnt - thank you samsung
Wow, that is pretty poor! Will you buy a Samsung TV in the future? If this happened to me, I certainly wouldn't. The fact that companies do this suggests otherwise might be true in many cases, unfortunately.
45 publicly visible posts • joined 5 Mar 2019
Some of this jargon is painful to hear I agree, but it's interesting to see what other people think of as jargon. For example, I'd have thought "noted" was a common word. It has a few different means depending on the context. What's the jargon usage for this? "Sing from the same hymn sheet" is a metaphor.
Language evolves, but not always in an ideal direction.
I believe the OP is correct that if something (e.g. a bike) can be shown to have been stolen, then it must be returned to the original owner. You're out of luck if you bought it for say cash down the pub.
https://www.citizensadvice.org.uk/consumer/somethings-gone-wrong-with-a-purchase/if-you-think-youve-bought-stolen-goods/
I'm unclear how this could be applied to a fungible token, it's an interesting question though. Anyone with a legal background care to comment?
The share price is down ~42% in the last year and ~39% over 5 years, so preserved doesn't seem accurate. Shareholders are important stakeholders in the survival of a public company. Having said all that, a dividend cut with that money going into R&D might be a sensible strategic move for Intel. I'm not a shareholder, but it's the sort of thing I would want to see if I were.
(Agree it's good to see the top leadership taking the most significant pay cuts. )
I know being vaguely positive isn't popular on the Web but... MS Teams works alright at our company, and our laptops are nearly four years old. Video calls are not quite as good as Zoom, but it's easier to use than Webex. MS Teams has made collaborating easier, e.g. working on shared docs. I can't see why a company would introduce Teams if they already had something like Slack, without retiring the existing product. It'd be like saying, "we've got Exchange email, but let's also introduce Gmail".
"Shall we switch to Hangouts or Slack?" said no one ever.
I fear you're right. UK Platinum Home Care Services Limited for example had net assets of £5.6k based on their last micro accounts (Feb 2021). The remedy would appear to be for directors to be disqualified, but it's a rare occurrence (in general). I've no idea if it's something the ICO could push for. (Yugashen Govender, one of the directors of the above company, setup another in April 2021 called Xtreme Appliance Cover Limited, I think we can guess the business model...)
Difficult to trust this when there are exceptions to the promised safe-guards, for which it's difficult to work out what they actually mean.
For example, the National Data Opt-out has an exception.
"NHS Digital won’t share any confidential patient information about you - this includes GP data, or other data we hold, such as hospital data - with other organisations, unless there is an exemption to this."
Then on trying to find out what this actually means.
"If you have registered a National Data Opt-out, NHS Digital won’t share any confidential patient information about you with other organisations unless there is an exemption to this, such as where there is a legal requirement or where it is in the public interest to do so, such as helping to manage contagious diseases like coronavirus. You can find out more about exemptions on the NHS website"
That leads to another page, at which point I find it difficult to work out what's relevant to General Practice Data for Planning and Research
https://your-data-matters.service.nhs.uk/privacynotice#Where-your-choice-does-not-apply
I don't see how they can claim this is straightforward and transparent communication with the public.
Hopefully this isn't a "not great, not terrible" moment. Interesting read. As a layman I imagined (without having really thought much about it) that a nuclear power plant was all slick sci-fi style high-tech, but in fact it sounds like old-skool industrial processes with equipment subject to wear. I think I preferred my fantasy-land version...
I change my worldview based on the facts, what do you do?
How about in 2018 (the last year that Apple reported iPhone unit sales separately) they sold 217.7 million iPhone units.
Source: https://investor.apple.com/sec-filings/sec-filings-details/default.aspx?FilingId=13040732
Apple's global market share was about 15% in 2018, which would put global sales at 1.451 billion.
Source: https://www.counterpointresearch.com/global-smartphone-share/
Crazy really, if they'd just bought and held Amazon stock from the start of 2012 they could be up ~17.5x (from a share price of ~$180 to today's price ~$3150). Be interesting to know if with that insider knowledge they actually managed to do better...
An interesting example of moral outrage in the defence of something (the Scot language), preventing something that would have likely protected the very thing. How little the person who commented “Proposer should educate him/herself in linguistic diversity” must have looked into this. Sadly, it feels like this is the way things are increasingly being run in government.
Agreed. I stopped wearing my FitBit for this reason. If every time I want to go for a run I have to open the FitBit app to ensure it definitely tracks, then I can use any app (e.g. Strava) and wear whatever watch I fancy. Getting a silent alarm to set on the FitBit was also a rigmarole of syncing multiple times.
https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/guide-to-data-protection/guide-to-the-general-data-protection-regulation-gdpr/principles/purpose-limitation/
"You can only use the personal data for a new purpose if either this is compatible with your original purpose, you get consent, or you have a clear obligation or function set out in law."