Novel marketing strategy
Oh noes, we made such rubbish equipment you'll have to buy our new stuff.
Not that new, really, but using Mythos as an excuse is clever.
"It's not our fault, it's these other guys being disruptive."
1126 publicly visible posts • joined 21 Dec 2018
NASA used to have emergency escape rockets bolted onto the nose of the capsule. If everything went pear-shaped, they would pull the astronauts to safety before deployed parachutes. Without checking, I think Apollo, Gemini and Mercury had them.
Never used in anger, but I think I'd prefer one to any kind of ground vehicle.
Taxonomy is a flawed concept really. It works 99% of the time, but there are always things that don't fit into our boxes.
Astronomers have been defining things based on their positions/motions rather than what they are.
White dwarfs are called stars, but really they are things that used to be stars, as they aren't really fusing anything any more.
Planetary nebulae should probably have been renamed by now. What something looked like in a telescope in the 19th century is a poor reason for the label.
Muskie also likes the Culture novels of Iain M Banks. These describe a universe where human-like beings have handed all of their decisions over to artificial intelligences known as minds. All of the dirty work is done by psychopathic droids and spaceships.
Many of his landing barges and other bits and pieces share names with Culture ships.
They are a good read, not so sure they are a good blueprint.
Ambridge is right next to Brigadoon, I believe. They are either side of Hadrian's Wall.
I've been as close to it as you can get in the real world, the studio where it is recorded. I have even played with the wooden box with the door knockers on it. So I have knocked on the doors of all of the houses.
I expect some of them have door-bells these days. Probably door cameras too.
You call that progress?
There are hierarchical digital transmission systems that work in exactly this way. The European and Japanese terrestrial systems had proposals for graceful degradation. I'm not aware of any actual real world systems that used this feature. It's possible Japan did this, but I'm not as familiar with their digital systems.
Lots of the digital specs had forward-looking, future proof features, but they were often not implemented.
You need a lot of Forward Error Correction to make digital broadcasting work, especially if the video or audio is digitally compressed.
Unfortunately, this creates a "digital cliff edge" where the signal is virtually perfect on one side of the threshold and unusable on the other side. I don't have any figures for DAB but digital video systems collapse completely over about half a dB difference in S/N. (Though they call this Eb/No in digital world so you can compare different schemes. It's a kind of normalisation.)
DAB was developed quite early and they didn't use enough FEC (imho).They do have an interesting scheme to protect the msb audio bits with better FEC than the lsbs.
But it's still rubbish. Especially in a car.
The Beeb started outsourcing "non-core" departments in the mid 80s. BBC Transmission lasted longer than the other departments.
They eventually ended up being part of Arqiva which also runs all of the old ITV and ILR transmitters.
Macquarie used to be a large (Australian) shareholder but sold their holding last year. Not sure who owns Arqiva now.
The BBC was unusual in owning their own transmitter network, but this only happened because they were such an early broadcaster.
Yes they were very big valves, bigger than a waste paper basket and water cooled with de-ionised water.
When I saw the one at Droitwich back in 1979 the Beeb were worried about replacement valves back then.
Even with all that power there were some places in the UK that couldn't pick up Radio 4 LW. I lived in a village that was basically a cleft in a hill and never heard The Archers for a year. This was in Southern England, not somewhere really rugged like Scotland or Wales.
From reading online comments on here and elsewhere, it has become obvious that the RasPi folks design and build gadgets that are no use to anyone at a price that nobody is prepared to pay.
It's frankly amazing that they are still in business.
As for the deluded fools selling cases, hats and other accessories, they are probably perpetrating some kind of fraud on their investors.
The world is full of bad people.
Does Janet have a mother (or possibly grandmother) with the same name?
I'm pretty sure I was learning programming in school using the Janet language round about 1972. I think there was a Joint Academic NETwork in use in the UK back then. The language we were using was very like BASIC, but I thought it was called Janet.
I have occasionally looked for info about it over the years but never found anything. Maybe it was BASIC after all?
Then we progressed onto FORTRAN. No floppies involved. Hollerith Cards, paper tape and fan fold paper.
Kids today!
Linux is not in the clear either. A colleague was trying to change a networking card from fixed IP to DHCP on a machine using the GNOME desktop. The GUI was quite happy that the switch had occurred. Rebooting had no effect. Changing the interface from the command line worked perfectly.
(Probably RedHat or some clone, it was a long time ago.)
But Windows is definitely worserer.
Windows NT. The original Windows didn't even have an IP stack, it used NetBEUI.
The company I was working for used PC hardware running SOLARIS to control the systems we sold to customers.
Eventually, the control software was ported to NT and, subsequently, various iterations of Windows Server.
It was not a happy, trouble-free journey.
I suppose, especially compared to recent offerings. The IP stack had some interesting/challenging features. I remember changing subnet masks was a bit flaky. GUI seemed happy with changes but they weren't applied until after one or more reboots. I recall weird memory leaks associated with prolonged use of UDP.
Still, miles better than predecessors.
I've tried to report the issue.
I've written two whiny comments about the lack of response.
It is time for me to escalate my response.
I shall refuse to comment on articles without a comment button.
Or maybe I should cross post about articles without a comment on articles that do have a comment button?
That'll learn 'em.
Or maybe I should just have my breakfast and ignore the shambolic mess for the rest of the day?
About that. When I were a nipper, fancy pants writing used to have combined a and e letters. Words like encyclopaedia, archaeology, palaeontology always had a combined a and e letters, but only when printed. (Or possibly I never saw anybody write them?)
When did UK printers drop those combined letters? Was it anything to do with computerised systems having a reduced set of glyphs?