Re: "has promised to pay £900 per claimant as part of reasonable legal fees to prepare their claim"
A day.... I've seen QCs charging that for an hour
They deserve the very best representation
44 publicly visible posts • joined 4 Dec 2018
Before vi, we used punch cards, but being a Yorkshireman we didn't waste money on machines to operate them, so we had to use really small scissors and cut the holes manually and then pass them to a guy called Nick who would use tiny magnets to write to the hard disk by hand. It was slow going but a nice milky cuppa and we were good to knuckle under and get it done
The system is designed to work at speeds of up to 37mph, it says nothing of limiting your speed, only that above 37mph this system will be unavailable to you.
Sometimes on motorways you will drive faster, and at those times you will steer manually. Other times you will find yourself going below 37mph, then you can activate this system and sit back.
Quite simple really, surprised people have misunderstood this.
I've seen worse, much worse. I had the pleasure a few years ago of terminating the contract with an Indian SaaS provider when one of my colleagues noticed by chance that their login page was doing an ajax request to retrieve an array of all usernames and passwords (in plain text) and then simply setting a "logged in" cookie if a match was found to what you entered. Setting the cookie to any valid user ID was enough to get you full access to whatever you wanted. We stopped using the software immediately, needless to say.
Shouldn't be too difficult to write a custom extension for chrome, I did one for myself that removes ads from a handful of sites that I like to visit but need the ads gone to even make sense of them as they're just too intrusive. Just a handful of simple lines of javascript that strip bits of DOM out of the pages, nothing particularly clever
I checked my location tracking thing one time after an email from Google invited me to have a look. I saw one day in particular I'd been at a motorsport event near the coast, I'd been in the same place all day. Except, according to Google, about an hour in the afternoon, when I jumped about 50 miles out to sea and back again. I must have not been paying attention because I definitely don't remember doing that
I was also a user of ACR. My Android device is asking me regularly to update to the latest major version but I'm putting it off as long as I can so that I can still use ACR. There's absolutely no reason for them to block call recording. I'm sure I remember reading ACR's blog something about Google citing privacy compliance, but that's nonsense. It's perfectly legal for me to record any calls I want in the UK without asking permission of the person I'm talking to, so long as it's for personal use, which it is.