I won't miss it.
I have never seen that on any webpage. So obviously nobody was using it.
4708 publicly visible posts • joined 8 Sep 2018
That is an understatement. I just searched (not asked) "planet with orbital period two days", and it answered first "there is none in the solar system", even when I uses "-solar" "-sun" -Venus" and so on no useful result.
Only when I entered "I am not talking about the solar system or venus, you idiot" into the AI chat it offered extrasolar planets. Four candidates with "two days" orbit. A google search check, with results from science.nasa.gov revealed: Only one of those four is correct. Last sentence I wrote into the AI chat was: "Kepler-407b is wrong. HAT-P-23b is wrong. WASP-43b is wrong. TOI-2267 d is the only right answer. You suck."
The google-AI is even too stupid to google-check its own results.
https://science.nasa.gov/exoplanet-catalog/kepler-407-b/
https://science.nasa.gov/exoplanet-catalog/hat-p-23-b/
https://science.nasa.gov/exoplanet-catalog/wasp-43-b/
https://science.nasa.gov/exoplanet-catalog/toi-2267-d/
Even the lowest bits of security for infrastructure, i.e. do NOT make such systems unprotected open to the internet, has not been followed since "too expensive, naaa, humans health is not important enough". Those holes and warnings have been known for decades, literally. Including a tons of warnings from many US organizations which DO give a fuck about it, the manufacturers for their liability "warning frees us from lawsuits" (<- and they are right), and single people who made those issues public many years ago.
Ghospix:So you can run multiple pixel sessions!
Ghoswin: So you can run multiple graphical application sessions!
Ghosaud: So you can have multiple audio stream sessions!
Ghoswin²: So you can have multiple graphical-audio application session in parallel on one screen, and have multiple screens!
So within the next 20 years it will be somewhere between X-Windows, NT 4.0 Terminal Server Edition (and its 'improved' follow-ups), and Citrix/Parallels. Of course with Agentic AI!
Then:
Ghosframe²: New name 'cause Microsoft sued and won the lawsuit over "win".
Ghosbox²: New name 'cause Shittrix still has a © of "Metaframe", and too similar.
Ghosx²: New name 'cause X is cooler!
Ghosy³: Spoken "GhosWhyCube", 'cause why?
On the mobile we are more at the mercy of automatic updates than anywhere else, for every app, that is the system behind it. Always force auto update. Why sticking to an old version, deliberately. It is the way that duopoly, here Apple and Google, and only a few gaul somehwere have no yet given up...
This is true. The "classical" ECC memory uses a hamming 127 cut off to 64, but if you go a bit higher, which i suspect is done for the internal ECC of DDR5, you can use a hamming distance of 4095 where ~0.3 % parity bits needed - ralistically though 0.6% since it would be cut off at 2048. Or 132071 cut off to 65536, which would requite only 1 partiy bits per 512 bytes (unless I miscalculated, it is evening here).
The standard of 8 parity per 64 bits is probably for simplicity when the technique was introduced and the circuits still had to stay simple.
That type of ECC, i.e. use five or nine regular RAM modules, or rather chips a few decades ago, for this was used "back then", when you combined 36 RAM chips or 72 RAM chips on a memory board the size of A4 / Letter. Sometimes the ECC logic was even on that big board AFAIK. The current ECC implementation is practically identical, just shrinked.
But if you want to take modern standard memory modules you need at least five or nine modules for a reasonable implementation, which means a lot of board layout and so on, for at least three better five to nine RAM channels on one CPU. That was easier when the RAM bus was small, i.e. only 16 bits or less.
For embedd you have a limited specific scope. ROM might be 16k or less, RAM might be 4k or less, and the "disk" storage might bei 4k or less. Even if you 16-fold those numbers you are still in a specific range where you can verify the code much easier. If you 128-fold those numbers you reach the region where Windows 3.11 might run on such an x86 embedd CPU.
I bet you mean ECC. This is why AMD. For over a decade now, nearing two decades, real ECC for desktop computers.
My Ryzen 2700x was built with 64 GB ECC RAM for that reason. Then upgrade to Ryzen 3900x, then to 5950x. My plan was to get the 16 core Ryzen with 3D-Cache on both chiplets as soon as it gets available, but AMD released that CPU a year to late, the RAM prices say "no". The 9950x3d2 CPU price is fine, but RAM costing over double than the CPU, let alone with real ECC OVÄR FAIVE TAIMES the CPU?
Oh, and I tested the ECC error correction with RAM overclocking on all three Ryzen. The computer suddenly gets very slow, I get an event log entry, but I can still do a clean shutdown. The server variants have better ECC correction hardware I suppose, 'cause THAT speed difference is not desired there.
Having it attached like DRAM, practically no endurance problem, four times the amount for roughly the same price and speeds which were, by that time, fantastic without comparison.
The problem: Intel marketing strategy. Only the most expensive Xeon CPUs were enabled for that type of memory-bus attached storage. If every Xeon, from the lowest to the highest, would have had it, it would have been a very big hit. Whether to use it as "swap", or "persistent storage cache", for database transactions files, or actually as RAM expansion since even MS-Windows has the ability to handle two memory speed classes.
We had a lot of cases where with smaller servers which could have used it. By that time most prominent in the lower segment: MS-Exchange, possibly combined via storage-spaces tiering or whatever, we could never put 3D XPoint in use. And for the higher segment: Was not needed there, since the price for more RAM was cheaper than whatever ran on those monster boxes and added complexity was rather frowned upon (i.e. not on the supported list).
But, actually, Intel should have even enabled 3D XPoint for nearly every CPU, not just Xeons, not repeating their stupid ECC-capability CPU politics.
Check https://www.theregister.com/Week/
Twice: "Microsoft seeks Supreme Court lifeline in pre-owned license battle"
Twice: "The roller coaster works, but the Six Flags kiosk has gone off the rails"
Twice: "SpaceX just about nails Starship test flight 13"
Twice: plus thirteen double more (I stopped counting after that)
***SHIFT*RELOAD*** Still there...
Vibe coding?
Actually On-Topic: Oh well, the next court thingy for MS... What about going back to quality, at least to the level reached somewhere around right before covid?
I tend to have a dent in my intended expression to indent.
What I meant is, since those 80 columns I worked with last millennia, indenting with two spaces is minimum. With 40 columns I'd agree, one space is enough, but 40 columns was the 6502/6510 era, when I was 10 to 14 years old, and such style had not reached me yet.
When a customer cuts off a few hundred workers of a subsidiary that way, no problem, can happen. But for MS this means: Really not enough paths, and really not even metric and/or BGP configured accordingly? I learned metric and how it works before the year 2000 and used it accordingly, BGP came later (though not many customers used it, and it was overkill for most). Should be "basic knowledge" for a company like Microsoft, and easy to prepare to atl that in advance...
They can. Connect a satellite dish. Done. Linear TV, if you can remember, still exists. Terrestrial TV works too, but the picture quality is a mess compared to satellite as source. You can even connect a 4k blu ray player, no internet required... Or a little linux box which does everything the way you want.
You totally miss the point that, in our case, a 77" monitor (my specific case) with 4k and 120 Hz literally does not exist. And my C1 from 2021, like most others, has a PC mode and a Game-console mode. Even my 65" Samsung from 2016 had it, though the follow up Samsung from 2021 I tried was such a massive failure I switched to above mentioned LG. Of course disable a few auto-brightness nonsense in the service menu is required.
I work at 100% zoom instead of 200% or more zoom, have more actual space instead of wasting it, being able to do pixel-edit in comfy 1.5 to 2 meters distance, using it as ebook-reader which allows sitting straight instead of head bowed down to the reader - important for your back. Except when I read from to couch :D.
Funny part, this is where LG has no issue. At least not my OLED C1 TV, which is >99.99% used as 4K 120Hz monitor. Neither LAN or WLAN connected.
The newer Models of C* and G* seem to behave the same. https://www.youtube.com/@hdtvtest if you are nerdy enough and https://www.rtings.com/tv .