
Re: Depends.
Americans do not speak English and I don't know why they insist that they do.
Quite right. Thither tis but one c'rrect f'rm to writeth.
932 publicly visible posts • joined 22 Aug 2018
there is little incentive for the investment company to provide class-leading service or fees.
There is incentive. People can opt out of the 401k entirely, and perhaps privately invest in an IRA instead. Company executives are in the same 401k plan as low-level employees. Individuals may opt to keep their money in the same 401k plan after leaving the company if the terms are reasonable.
It's not unusual for bad employers to offer 401k services with long term yields of -10% annually.
"For 2011, the average total administrative and management fees on a 401(k) plan was 0.78 percent" -- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/401(k)#Fees
401k plans typically have 50+ investment options to choose from, and I have yet to see one that doesn't have an S&P 500 option with low fees. They certainly offer options that have higher fees, but only people so lazy as to not read a couple pages and select a good investment option will get steered into those.
If you don't like your company's plans, the moment you leave the company, you can transfer the entire cash value of your 401k into any brokerage firm's "Rollover IRA" account and invest it without restrictions, even day-trading with your balance. Or more realistically, sticking it in a lower-fee S&P500 fund. And of course you can just opt-out of the company 401k plan entirely if you choose.
The attached strings are that the administration & underlying investment is controlled by the employer and their choosen investment company. The individual cannot (E.G.) use the funds in the account to purchase an S&P 500 ETF, and earn the 10% (or whatever) tax free for their working life.
The employer does choose the plan administrator, but they typically have 50+ investment options to choose from, and I have yet to see one that doesn't have an S&P 500 option, with the low fees.
The moment you leave the company, you can transfer the entire cash value of your 401k into any brokerage firm's "Rollover IRA" account and invest it without restrictions, even day-trading with your balance. Or more realistically, sticking it in a lower-fee S&P500 fund.
Is there an answer to this conundrum? Probably not,
Restructure taxes... make capital gains double or triple its current rate, and restore tax-advantages back to dividend yields.
That way, holding shares for long-term investment would become preferred over juicing short-term profits and selling your shares to a bigger idiot.
Unfortunately there's now an av1 patent pool mudding the waters.
MPEG patent-holders have always been spreading FUD about patent-free codecs. This is to be expected. It's an existential threat to their business.
The MPEG-LA got a pittance settlement out of their court case, and were being investigated by the US Department of Justice for their anti-competitive actions. Nokia's patent claim failed in a German court. VPx has not fallen afoul of a single patent yet, and the huge players implementing AV1 like Cisco and Google without being sued is a pretty strong statement that none of the claimed patent holders actually even believe their own claims will hold up in court now, either.
Theora was a sad chapter. VP3 was made free in 2001 back when it was reasonably competitive with other patented video codecs. But it saw almost no adoption, as the Theora project was in the works that was going to dramatically improve the codec and standardize it. Not until 2008 did Theora get an initial release, long after the world world had moved on to newer formats Theora couldn't hope to compete with. And all the while there were loud-mouthed Theora supporters using cherry-picked demos to insist it was better than everything else, while 99% of the world utterly ignored it as a failed experiment in non-commercial public collaboration and development of video codecs. You can still see echos of this petty advocacy in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theora#Performance
I anxiously await a patent-free video format gaining popularity. It's one thing to use it on your computer, but quite another to have something widely implemented in hardware so you can play your videos on all your multimedia devices.
It is not about programs that can _view_ PDF files. It is about programs that can: [1] Allow you to complete PDF forms. [2] Allow you to annotate non-form PDFs, so you can fill in forms that were meant to be printed.
That's fine. By all means, point me to a platform that doesn't have applications that can handle PDF forms and annotate PDFs, but does get modern versions of Firefox.
Personally, I've always hated the Firefox PDF viewer, as it quite often doesn't print out PDFs as they are formatted, which is the #1 feature PDFs have going for them. Disabled it across my company, to eliminate all the regular complaints that PDFs (that my program generated) were cut-off when printed, as well as terrible performance on very large PDFs. I'm happy to try it again to see if they've improved things, though I don't see any compelling reason to when the native PDF viewer works great (on all platforms).
The *only* Linux one I could find that could do both was Okular, which is ugly and needs hundreds of megs of KDE libraries installed.
Fortunately you found one.
I'm not sure why you need ONE app to be able to do both, when we're talking about lightweight free apps. That sounds like the Windows mindset. In the Linux world, I'd go straight to a fully capable PDF editor, instead of using a tacked-on annotation feature in a crippled "viewer" app.
Personally, I open PDFs in Xournal if I need to edit, erase, draw on, or annotate them. Well known and even more capable PDF editors include Inkscape, Scribus, LibreOffice Draw, and Qoppa.
This eliminated the need for a separate PDF viewer or plugin – especially handy for operating systems that may not have one.
Please name ONE operating system where modern Firefox runs, but which doesn't have one or more PDF viewers...
Because I can name a huge number of the opposite... Lots of platforms can open PDFs but don't or can't have modern web browsers.
For instance, the official Adobe Reader for Linux was discontinued after version 9 and that decade-old version doesn't install smoothly on modern Linux,
Right, no Adobe Acrobat on Linux, but a dozen PDF readers available for sure. Ghostscript (found on practically every Linux system) is great, allowing converting anything to or from PDF, stripping password protection out, quickly lowering image resolution to shrink gigantic PDFs to reasonable sizes, etc., and that's just one common tool, not mentioning all the things you can do utilizing a few others
I have never seen a bit of equipment killed by static electricity.
ESD protection is a feature in chips these days. Not that equipment is invulnerable now, just much more robust than it used to be. Go back to about the 486 or Pentium 1 era, and motherboards would just suddenly die if you touched them before putting on a wrist strap... micro static you don't even feel, and it is just gone, black screen and no activity on power-on. Making it worse, components were quite a lot more expensive back then, so it was a significant loss whenever it happened.
I'm all for not memorizing things you can look-up easily...
And I'm in the camp of "If I was looking at the config file I could tell you exactly what to change, but I can't explain--theoretically, in a conference room--how I do my job.
But still, I'm not with you on being completely ignorant of the name wireshark. It is an incredibly well-known cross-platform tool any network admin would have experience with, it comes up in discussions and documentation.
I mean... how do you install and run it when you don't have a clue what it's called?
It's pretty extreme to be unable to recall the name. The problem in this case may not be with the whole rest of the world. This seems to be just a "you problem" that you might want to look to fix, by doing something as simple as carrying around a card or small notebook with important job-position relevant terms written down with definitions.
Giving back lyrics with proper attribution might be fine
No. Absolutely not. Not ever.
You might as well say it would be okay to play back a feature film, or output a full newly released book. Absolutely not allowed.
It's usually fine to show a small snippet, condense/summarize, list facts about it, or offer your imprecise recollection of it, but otherwise, just no, not allowed and not fine. Certainly not in a for-profit commercial setting with no way to claim it's for news, educational, or commentary purposes.
Yeah, let me know how the great firewall of Russia or China keeps the vpn's out.
China certainly does. Deep packet inspection identifies likely VPN endpoints, and blocks those foreign IPs.
They've been lenient about VPNs years ago, but more recently have been very aggressive and rather successful at blocking nearly all VPN services.
https://www.techradar.com/news/china-will-block-all-non-approved-vpns-from-next-month
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-vpn-idUSKBN1A51OB
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Firewall (Search for "VPN")
They do generally allow VPNs to/from foreign companies, but they get blocked from time to time. I had to deal with it myself a number of years ago when my company had offices in China. And these days they may need to be registered to be allowed at all.
"Flow batteries typically have a higher energy efficiency than fuel cells"
"cycle energy efficiency (50–80%)."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flow_battery
Flow batteries allow "fuel" to be brought-in by truck or pipeline, but they don't NEED to unless there's an unexpectedly long outage. Instead they can have enough storage tanks on site and just "recharge" them while electricity is available which is far cheaper/more efficient than hauling anything in.
Plus, if you were a truck driver, would you rather haul electrolyte, diesel, or hydrogen?
are people seriously still using FTP in 2023? what's up with SSH / SCP
You may be shocked to learn that Alphabet Inc doesn't just go around selling alphanumeric characters, Amazon.com has nothing to do with the rain forest or river, Twitter.com will not sell you any birds, Facebook offers neither books or faces, etc.
WS_FTP also, strangely enough, supports more than just the "FTP" protocol. Since at least 2010, they have offered SFTP support:
https://www.serverwatch.com/servers/getting-started-with-ipswitchs-ftp-server-ws_ftp-server-7-5/
If Microsoft was going to lock down computers so I couldn't do that, they've had about three decades to try.
They've tried, far more times then you're willing to admit. They've been taken to court over such behavior, and even an anti-trust trial where they were almost split into multiple companies.
They had a lot of success for many years telling OEMs they had to pay the Windows license fee for all systems sold, even if with an alternative operating system, making it much more costly NOT to include Windows.
They had some success making ACPI locked-down to Windows, to the point that Linux systems have to report themselves as "Microsoft Windows NT" in order to operate on just about any PCs. Bill Gates got caught red-handed writing a memo on that topic trying to sabotage other OSes: "Maybe we couid define the APIs so that they work well with NT and not the others".
Would you like more? As I said, there's a whole DOJ antitrust lawsuit full of material.
EEE PC 900 [...] underpowered as hell, but it's very small, and lightweight enough to hold in one hand while I type with the other while it's plugged into a ethernet switch as I debug networking problems.
Mine's going strong, too. I've upgraded it though, doubling the RAM, installing an mSATA adapter for more & faster internal storage, and dual-band USB Wi-Fi.
One of the nice features is the 12V power input. Powered directly from my car with a $1 plug adapter, instead of a $30 power supply with voltage conversion. Maybe USB-C PD will make this cheaper.
So small it drops right in a duffel bag, no protective case needed.
Not my first time around with netbooks though. I kept a 486 Compaq Contura going for a lot of years, right up until the EEE PC arrived on the market actually. What good is a large, high performance laptop that you don't have with you because it's too bulky to always carry around with you? Couldn't justify the ridiculously expensive sub-notebook prices before the EEE... I'm a bit rough on them.
it hasn't contributed back upstream. As the other comments show, this is the problem with permissive licences
Not really. If someone doesn't want to contribute anything back, they won't.
With the GPL, you can make source changes pretty much unusable by upstream.
This was the situation with Apple and KHTML: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WebKit#Split_development
Or with NeXT and Objective-C: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Objective-C#Popularization_through_NeXT
Not to mention patents, Tivoization, "cloud" services (no code released to the public), some companies' flagrant license violations, etc. And let's not forget RedHat's recent removal of source repositories and restrictive RHEL license agreement.
It tends to be bad PR that forces companies to be good stewards of open source and free software, not minimal adherence to the license.
With more liberal license like the BSDv2, companies who wish to contribute have a choice, and may decide they're in a better position to contribute money upstream, while keeping code changes to themselves. The BSDs are seeing continued development with no shortage of funding, despite their liberal licenses.
Sometimes contributing your code back is just plain self-interest, as you can get others to maintain your code for you, such as the case of Paragon's NTFS driver, and any of thousands of other cases where companies have put in considerable effort to get their horrible mess of patches into shape to be accepted into the Linux kernel. Nvidia Linux drivers serve as a counter-example, showing all the effort required to stay on top of kernel changes if you don't wish to contribute your code upstream.
Then there's lots of companies that release their code as open source despite having no obligation to do so, just because they can. Though the above free public maintenance might factor into the decision in part.
And let's not forget standardization... Lots of network services whose implementations were released under very liberal license (Apache, BIND, OpenSSH, Sun NFS, bittorrent, etc.) have become widespread standards, while I can't think of one GPL licensed implementation of a network service which has been nearly so widely successful... only Rsync comes to mind as getting some little traction.
The thing I most want listed on airline ticket comparison sites is seat width. I'm almost 2m tall with wide shoulders, so a seat the size of an A4 piece of paper just doesn't work. Last flight, I sat with my body turned at a 45 deg angle the entire 2 hour flight because I was next to a similarly large guy and there was just no pretending the airline seats could work as seats for both of us. Airlines keep shrinking them because they can keep those changes secret until after you've paid and are boarding. I'll gladly pay considerable extra for whatever ticket showed I'd have an extra inch or two of seat width... just not the exorbitant prices of 1st class tickets.
Flying was fun as a child. Now it's the most miserable and demeaning process I ever have to go through, maybe just above invasive medical exams... and in both cases I'm paying to be abused. I'd rather hop into a coffin and have my box shipped to the destination. I either drive, take the train, or most often just decide I don't need to travel at all.
not all of which have reliably redundant power supplies. (I've been burned before by supposedly 'redundant' PSUs which fail when they have to support the load they're supposed to be rated for).
Best to find that out for certain during your scheduled maintenance window, rather than unexpectedly...
IIRC they are running out of DVDs.
They're not, still a huge selection, although there have been odd gaps in their selection the past few years.
An ironic one that comes to mind is Longmire. Series 2 is unavailable on DVD, but 1 & 3-6 are there. Guess who owns Longmire? Yes: Netflix.
There's always the routine small % of discs that get damaged in shipping and need to be replaced.
Most of their DVD customers now are art film fans who want obscure criterion collection disks
Unlikely. The most rented film are overwhelmingly new releases:
https://dvd.netflix.com/Top100
Pretty obvious they're using impractical "green" technology promised down the road, to sell a heavy electric utilization on a dirty grid right now. They'll slow-walk and spend barely any money on the reactors and hydrogen for a few years, then quietly announce they had to give up.
It's strange because solar and wind power are immensely practical and economical right now.
And a much more efficient alternative to generators than hydrogen are redox-flow batteries, where the charged electrolyte can similarly be generated from electricity, stored in tanks much easier than hydrogen, and trunked in from far away if a refill is needed during an extended power outage.
I'll just fork out another £200 the rent to get +1 rooms
I would gladly do so, to avoid the hour commuting to/from the office daily, and transit costs (be it fuel or ticket prices).
Being able to expense my cell phone, home internet, and more that I'd be paying for anyhow, eats away at some of that £200 figure as well, even if your time is worthless and transit is free.
I get more excited when I can read reactions immediately, or have ad-hoc whiteboard discussions.
Video conferencing has been a thing for decades.
when my work desk was in my bedroom, I found myself thinking of work
So put together an office in a separate room... even if it's just a small converted closet. Else, take your laptop into a coffee shop, or rent a small office space.
What about blacksmiths & carpenters?
Not much of a work-from-home debate for people in those professions.
https://assets.amuniversal.com/59bfb2402e0d013a8769005056a9545d
trying to work out what the sender implied rather than said. Misunderstandings abound
How many people in your office should be punished because a few have poor written communication skills? Why shouldn't those poor communicators just be required to improve their skills?
Besides, WFH doesn't require all communications to be written. When I find someone is poorly communicating in e-mail or chat, I just start an ad-hoc video conference with them, as long as needed.
Always nice to have people for whom WFH doesn't work, yelling at everyone else that it must not work for them, either, so they should go into an office every day.
bumping into someone in the hall and discussing a topic neither of you planned on discussing five minutes earlier. Or overhearing coworkers discussing a problem that they don't realize involves you...but you realize it does
I'd call that a 1% thing. The other 99% is noise and distractions which are detrimental to doing your job. We can put a little more effort into getting those 1% communications happening, in exchange for eliminating most of the 99% of garbage.
They certainly weren't only lending out old books.
My opinions on copyright length don't make me blind to the law. I don't run a business where I go handing out DVDs of movies from the 80s, claim it's perfectly legal and was cleared by my lawyers, and expect no negative consequences from my actions.
Lots of organizations do good things, even while they break the law.
Archive.org seriously screwed up with their "National Emergency Library". At the time of launch, everybody could see it was a clear copyright violation with no plausible legal basis. That stupid move ruined their formerly sterling reputation, and opened up the floodgates to lawsuits.
I'll be the first to say that copyright terms are much too damn long if they're getting sued for digitizing scratchy old 78 records. The US should go back to it's original 14 years and one optional 14 year extension, and quit pretending there's any public benefit in preventing Charlie Chaplin movies from entering the public domain.
there is significantly more risk of a laser if the beam hit something. Unless the outputs are really silly RF is generally on dangerous if you are in the vicinity or the transmitter.
There's nothing particularly dangerous about lasers, except that the human eye can be easily damaged by very powerful lights. And this one is in the infrared range where that's even less of a concern. A laser would have to be insanely powerful to pose a danger to people all the way from Mars, so that's really not a concern at all.
As for real human health risks, visible light happens to be the dividing line between safety and danger, and this is below that... Lasers in the high UV spectrum, or RF at or above those frequencies, are classified as ionizing radiation. Here's a nice chart:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:EM-spectrum.svg
There is nothing mentioned about the power of the laser but it cannot be insignificant.
It's just a 4 W, 1.55 µm laser. The low power requirements are one of the big benefits to NASA.
Light is also impacted by atmospheric conditions such as cloud. Now if the laser was at Cerro Paranal or Mauna Kea that mitigates some of that.
RF is impacted by atmospheric conditions as well. Moisture in the air / clouds absorb a lot of RF energy across much of the radio spectrum.
While it's not quite Mauna Kea, the receiver is the mountain-top Palomar Observatory in California.
I wonder what the effective bitrate is
Article says 10-100 times over the current radio frequency technology. MRO can currently do a maximum of 5.2 Mbps via radio, so I guess we're talking 50-500Mbps with fricken' lasers.
Except NASA's poster says otherwise... Looks like 1 - 100Mbps from Mars distances.
https://www.lpi.usra.edu/opag/july2014/posters/9-DSOC_OPAG_Poster.pdf
Of course, this is an experiment so only time will tell what the actual reliable operational speed will be.
I wonder how the transceiver orbiting Mars keeps itself even aligned with Earth.
Well, it starts the same way as any other deep space communication... Radio transmissions are still a narrow beam, they're not just broadcasting out with an omni-directional antenna. They have to track the Earth with their instruments and orient themselves or antennas appropriately. Losing sight of the base station and having interruptions because of moons are the kind of things they already have to deal with... Not too many radio frequencies will go through hundreds or thousands of KMs of solid rock, ice, or iron.
Once it has the target roughly in sight, it locks onto the laser beacon & uplink signal from Earth to get a precise fix.
I always liked the BSD 'fake' shutdown option (-k) with 5 mins grace (to get the users off or avoid Han's mistake) followed with a real shutdown.
I set-up our UPS low-battery shutdown alerts to report to everyone the system will go down in 3 minutes, though it's actually scheduled for 2 minutes.
I hate procrastinators.
Rent controls and other legislation intended to protect tenants frequently have the effect of reducing the supply or rented property, and driving up rents.
If by "driving up rents" you mean increasing the price apartments are advertised for, then yes. I much prefer going into a unit at the proper price, rather than a "starter" price that goes up by 50% after you've moved in. Less expense in frequently relocating that way.
Rent is certainly awful in places.
if I could see myself 2 years ahead, then I should buy rather than rent. That would cover the overheads of the actual purchase & subsequent sale.
I expect that's only true if you assume housing prices will hold steady or increase. Hope you are never unlucky enough to sign a mortgage at the height of a housing bubble.
I certainly never purchasing working out in areas I was renting. The property taxes, insurance, utility prices that would be included in rent, quickly matched rental prices, and that's without considering maintenance costs should the roof, HVAC system, plumbing or similar fail.
measures such as putting flow restrictors onto supply pipes and charging more for water during periods when demand is high.These steps are necessary to reduce pressure on the infrastructure during hot weather when demand for water surges,
Surely these steps are meant to INCREASE (water) pressure...
Even on old platforms, you can find OpenJDK builds:
https://github.com/alexkasko/openjdk-unofficial-builds#openjdk-unofficial-installers-for-windows-linux-and-mac-os-x
https://github.com/ojdkbuild/ojdkbuild
https://adoptopenjdk.net/releases.html
https://developer.ibm.com/languages/java/semeru-runtimes/downloads/
https://adoptium.net/temurin/releases/
Cut out the Oracle stuff out before the infection takes over.
the Debian installation required "something like a dozen CD-ROMs."
Even today it doesn't require that much!
Unfortunately, the internet connection in Charlie's office was slow and unreliable at the best of times,
I hope Charlie learned about wget, curl, and other download managers since then. I was using Go!Zilla and GetRight in the mid-90s to download Linux ISOs over dial-up on Windows.