welfare
DWP "welfare" includes pensions.
It's always what you're NOT told that is important.
126 publicly visible posts • joined 22 Aug 2018
I used to buy loads from them. Then one time ordered a lot of ink cartridges. They came in several separate deliveries. But was short one cartridge.
I took photos, tried communicating with them. They just insisted they had sent everything. Actually the last couple of emails said I had received everything. Called me a liar without using that word.
Given that was after having bought tens of thousands of pounds of components, ink, etc in the previous few months.
If I had been minded to mess them about, it would have been over a much more valuable item than a £12 yellow ink cartridge.
I've never bought anything else from them since, and never would have. Utter lack of civility in their customer service people.
"The Facebook goliath said users will begin receiving in-app and email notifications explaining what data will be used - which excludes private messages and any content from those under the age of 18. These notices will include a link to an objection form, to opt out, which Meta insists is easy to use and will be honored."
I doubt it.
The normal practice for this stuff is a legalesely wordy email saying they're changing their terms and conditions and if you continue using the site you'll be deemed to have accepted.
Almost never anything that provides real "informed consent".
What did it in the market I was in at that time, was the software pirating.
Software - very especially games - could be easily copied for the "IBM clones". Cue all the young boys convincing parents to buy a cheap Windows machine "for education". That led to professionals and small business folk seeing the affordable potential.
From then there was no holding it back.
As an aside, that's also what did for the Archimedes. A good machine, heavily punted at the time by Acorn with a PC emulator. Until enough people realised you could buy a real PC for half the price.
"In the US, datacenters can consume anywhere between 300,000 and four million gallons of water"
Right, every time we read financial values here they are followed by ($ equivalent in US dollars).
Why is it different when the value is firstly expressed in US amounts?
This story is focussed on something other than money, but it's the same argument.
"xx million gallons": as others have queried, what sort of gallons? And how much is that in real measurement?
Sounds like mealy mouthed assurances from all the high powered high paid executives.
Where's the guarantee that they'll do what they've promised?
"The CMA wants legally binding commitments "
There's one way to ensure that - get a registered charge over some of their assets. To be cleared when the commitments have been met.
"The number is based on findings that 52 percent of UK businesses have experienced at least one cyber attack in the past five years"
Well then, I must have been doing something right after all!
Thinking back on all or any "cyber security" type of problems I've heard about from all my clients combined, it's way less than 52%.
I'd think only maybe less than 10% of them have had any issues whatever.
Other than requests like "does this email look dodgy" - usually it's a bounce report for spam that's spoofed their email address.
Once more a US politician wants to change stuff for all the wrong reasons.
Where has he been all these years when these very self same corporate registrars have been facilitating criminality? Domains that were used to scam vulnerable people. Where was his faux concern then?
He's jumping on the bandwagon of self righteous virtue signalling. Incorporating the Enemy-Du-Jour into his argument.
Don't even get me started about the propensity of the USA thinking it's the world's policeman and it can make the rules and the rest of the world has to live by them.
Maybe if some of these "responsible" government types put more effort into old fashioned diplomacy instead of aggressiveness, it might reduce the cyber aggression from others.
It won't make any juicy headlines in the Daily Express, but I'm all for anything that helps to tone back this inexorable talking ourselves into conflict.
Yes, and I would say the Amstrad had an early success because of the bundles.
From memory, it came with around 20 or more games bundled. When the young lad wanted a computer for Christmas, Mother (and it was always the mother who made the decision) often chose the one with the huge number of bundled games. There was always at least one educational game in there to justify buying it.
Also remembering the overall effect of the local markets. You could buy a copy of this week's latest and greatest game for £2 or £3 at the market. Saturdays and Sundays they were swarming with youngsters and sometimes parents.
Different days :-)
It does not seem unreasonable to me that a manufacturer would want details on who and what device is asking for spare parts.
For a start, the manufacturer is going to want to track any patterns in problems. Might lead to identifying production weaknesses, or design flaws.
Also to ensure parts are going to real end-users.
"said to consume about 264 billion gallons of water"
Is that Imperial gallons, or US gallons, or what?
Why is this value not shown in a universal measurement, for example litres?
Or even metric tonnes?
We'll have to assume the billion referred to is a US billion.
It's not like El Reg to use random units of measurement now, is it?
Decades ago I was tasked with clearing out an old bank vault.
Amongst all the usual accounts stuff, there were boxes of info going back to the start of the second world war. There was a trove of official documents detailing how the local bank branches were to organise to survive intense bombing.
The gist was that every day copies of absolutely everything were to be made and sent by train to the next town up the road. Copies of everything. By hand. Now that was true 'back up procedures'.
They in turn would receive the 'back ups' from another bank in the opposite direction.
There was a large amount of detail written down.
To my young eyes this was fascinating. Sadly I believe it was all burnt.
So even if we put in lots of effort to save stuff now, how do we know how it will be treated in the future?
One of the phones in our house didn't get switched off. So it got the alert.
It was an American accented voice.
That to me was the most shocking aspect of this. How little cost or effort would it have been to change this?
If the alert thing is of such big importance, at least take ownership of it. Typical UK - do it on the cheap, but no doubt with a huge price tag to the government.
The seller took the money and nobody raised an eyebrow.
The purchaser has been open about who they are. Now eyebrows have been raised.
The Chinese need to learn how real capitalists do this. Obfuscate your ownership through anonymous secret offshore companies and trusts.
Do it the big boy way.
At least 11 mentions of wrongly spelt FIBRE in the article. That must have taken effort to copy & paste and change at the same time.
This was a 100% UK story about a 100% UK company being read mainly by a 100% UK audience.
However effort went into editing and changing the content - why? To what end? For what purpose?
If the intention was to annoy said audience, it's worked. It is actually very jarring reading along then bumping into some of this wrong spelling.
It's like reading something from Viz.
The first paragraph says this is about happenings in Great Britain.
Further down the article there are four mentions that it's about the UK.
Once it talks about Britain.
Once upon a time El Reg was vaunted for its attention to detail, it was a site one could quote safe in the knowledge of its infallibility.
New domains are bought/registered through Registrars.
There must a pattern in that study that points to probably no more than a small handful of registrars that are processing these new domains.
That's where enforcement should be concentrating. Cut the bad guys off at source.
If we're talking millions of new domains per month which are used and thrown away very quickly, there has to be some level of either collaboration or at least turning a blind eye.
You're not alone. Seven instances of "fiber" in an article about fibre.
That would have warranted at least a thousand lines of 'I must spell fibre properly' in the good old days. Or even a belting in some schools.
Seriously though, it does spoil the readability of the article. It's like thumping into a brick wall at 50 mph, fairly knocks you off your concentration.
Was the article intended to read like a glorification of venture capitalists?
Of course the money men always have the final say, but at least in these islands we've always had the fig leaf of engineering and 'how it's done' stories being of a lot more interest to the public.
As a techie, my interest is definitely more in the service.
Maybe us grumpy old gits are the new snowflakes?
Since the dawn of time, mankind realised that thumping your neighbour could be sorted by kissing and making up.
What is it about politicians and leaders that they insist on turning a blind eye to that?
Diplomacy takes time, and never makes for news headlines. But when it works it can save lives.
There's a big business in pushing aggression and enhancing an "us and them" attitude. There is no good end point with that approach. At best it becomes a standoff.
As we currently see in Europe, the end game of aggressive posturing is death and destruction.
It's time for this war of words to end.
The appendage "II" to the queen's name is only correct for England. That is, she was only Elizabeth the Second in England.
In Scotland and the other Commonwealth countries there never was an Elizabeth the First, so she could never be the Second.
When she was crowned, there was a big stushie in Scotland over that naming convention. To the extent that a great number of replacement pillar boxes with the initials E2R were damaged. The result to this day is that there are very few E2R pillar boxes at all in Scotland, in fact there are more with the old George initials.
While we're on the subject, Elizabeth never was the "queen of the UK". That is factually not the case.
In England she was crowned queen of England. Wales as a militarily conquered nation is included in that.
In Scotland she was Queen of Scots. With a separate coronation.
Charles will need to have his separate coronation as King of Scots. Interestingly, the law around that is that the king is king with the acceptance of the people. In theory the Scots people can replace the monarch if they so wish. Being king/queen of the people, not of the country.
A bit off topic: the queen Elizabeth the First (of England) was the one who ordered the chopping off the head of her cousin, Mary Queen of Scots. On the basis that Mary was a threat to Elizabeth's holding of the monarchy.
Last laugh came when Elizabeth died, and Mary's son James who was the Scottish king at the time, got the throne of England as well.
"rogue foreign powers — China in particular "
I can understand North Korea or Myanmar being called that, but China ?
The last I heard China is a functioning part of the United Nations. There is at least one more powerful, richer country that only uses the UN when it's useful to them. The same major power country that began withholding huge amounts of its dues years ago and caused loads of trouble for the UN.
It's pretty obvious that some countries are intent on going to war. I wish El Reg wasn't regurgitating the propaganda.
Seconded about the old school BT engineers.
Years ago I had a workshop off the beaten track. Bad guys came after dark and pulled down the outside telephone cables - thinking that'll put the burglar alarms out of action.
Then broke in to the workshops. Of course the Red Care system kicked in right away, and the cops and I were on the scene right away.
The point of this is: I phoned BT and an engineer came out within an hour or two. Now this was a Saturday night, after midnight, horribly cold and wet, the rain was pouring down as it only can in the Scottish wilderness.
The engineer who came out - this was his first call out since returning after a heart attack, over 60 years old, up a telephone phone for a couple of hours in that weather, and only me and an umbrella to protect him if the bad guys had come back.
I won't ever put down those old school engineers.
I'm sure he never had the pay he deserved.
I ask why China has been doing these total lockdowns of whole cities and the like.
Could it be they have info that indicates that these hassles are less damaging in the long run than the probability of long term long covid?
While us plebs in the free world get sent back to work and shopping and generally mixing with all and sundry and spreading our loving covid all around.
The attitude of our leaders in the free world is always of short term financial gain. So long term consideration of (as yet) uncertain health complications don't trouble the beancounters.
Whereas the dear leaders in the east maybe think more about long term risk?
Have to say I have a lot of sympathy for what razzaDazza1234 says.
A family member worked with a well known charity years ago to setup a new project. Very worthwhile, helpful for many people project.
She did it as a volunteer, not only unpaid but also got lots of other people to contribute financially and practically.
She got out after only a year or more. The politics was overwhelming. Both internal politics - ladder climbing, empire building, all the sort of stuff you expect in a local authority, but also party political stuff - croneyism, and outright blanking people who were known to have other viewpoints.
She would get ignored during meetings, seldom any follow up with assistance.
Indeed, look at the top of big charities. Massive salaries. International shoulder rubbing. And lots of party political shenanigans.
The old adage about truth being the first casualty of war.
People screaming about propaganda, and shut down Russia's TLDs and domains.
For any sake, the internet is about much more than propaganda. It's also about much more than being a vehicle for nasty attacks.
The internet fuels vast communications between people everywhere. Good and bad. Mostly for the good.
Well done that Mueller guy for standing firm in the face of what was probably strong pressure.
This invasion has been ongoing for a few days and we have people calling for total isolation of one country and all its people from the rest of the planet.
The conflict in Myanmar has been ongoing for years with thousands dead and well over a million refugees. The world turns a blind eye.
Iraq ? Libya ? Afghanistan? Bombed back to the stone ages, invaded, Probably a million dead and many millions of refugees, causing social unrest throughout Europe for years. Have we cut off their internet???
Conflicts are never solved by more conflict (unless through total extermination of one side). Solutions need discussion. Talking. Seems that diplomacy failed in Ukraine, but that is no reason to pull that plug. The only way back to "normality" is with cool heads and dialogue.