And?
Just because it is *your* preferred style of kink doesn't mean that my kids should be wandering into it, if I don't want them to.
327 publicly visible posts • joined 20 Aug 2018
What you need is a *seabag*: insanely sturdy, tardis-like in its ability to hold far more inside than the visible volume should allow, and can still be worn on the back without (usually) falling over.
Roughly cylindrical in shape so it can be plopped in a corner and be more or less out of the way. Or you can lay it down and sit on it; just tell people that it is an ergonomic chair of some sort.
The Electoral College was explicitly *designed* to somewhat dilute the power of big population centers, and it does that just fine. It's working as designed. Some of the states wouldn't have joined the union without it (nor without the two Senators per state design of the Senate).
Just because the "right" (i.e. Left) people didn't like the outcome this last time doesn't change that.
Ironically, it was the losers who were floating a plan to manipulate the College. When that failed, they decided that they hated it again.
"At some tipping point, it will cause an economic collapse if nothing is done, as there will be such a big divide between those that have money and jobs and those that do not, that the industries will no longer need to produce anywhere near what they used to, as no one can afford to by any of it."
This is the part where you need to show your work. It has always been predicted, and never happened.
There's a rather obvious moderating effect here as when *fewer* people can afford to buy (or as people in general become *less* able to afford to buy) that producing gets less profitable. This is not a static system, nor are the variables binary.
Not saying that what you foresee *couldn't* happen, just that it hasn't, and that there are reasons to think that it won't.
"The idea that short skirt and heels should be worn because it will turn male customers into drooling cavemen who'll then buy anything is very outdated in my opinion, and I find it a bit cringeworthy. Detailed knowledge of what you're selling is much more important for technology."
Riiight ... that's why booth babes don't exist.
No, but I use the Start menu. You are supposed to be able to type the first letters of your program and be presented with the program menu item so you can click and launch. Today, nothing.
Or if you are asking "why would an internet search be coupled with a Start menu search", well, that's a fine question.
Amazing. Self confident bluster indeed ... on your part.
The only reason that you find this confusing is your belief that Brexiters are racist. I'm sure it is very difficult to let go of a belief in which you are so heavily invested.
The incongruity at which you laugh is that which is betwixt reality and your beliefs.
Yup, time for the old story.
A high powered businessman was late to the biggest meeting of his career, a make or break thing. And his car wouldn't start! Panicked, he noticed a man walking up the street, carrying a toolbox, wearing coveralls which had a logo indicating that he worked as a mechanic.
"Please help me get this started, I'll pay big!"
The mechanic nodded, opened the bonnet, and peered around. Finally, after two agonizing minutes, he took out a little ballpeen hammer, took careful aim, and tapped somewhere on the motor once. Quickly closing everything up, he wiped his hands, started the car, found a napkin, and scrawled out a handwritten bill.
"200 pounds!" roared the businessman. "For tapping once on the motor with a hammer?"
"Oh," replied the mechanic. You want the *detailed* invoice." He found another napkin and wrote one out.
£1 - Tapping on motor
£199 - Knowing where to tap
It *isn't* the only response. There are a wide range of mental health options in the US, public and private. They vary a lot by location, of course. (Nowheresville in the desert can't just magic up a psychiatrist.)
However, depriving you of liberty - *forcing* you to receive mental health treatment - can generally only be done if you are judged to present a danger to yourself or others due to your mental illness.
This determination is made by a judge (based on medical evidence), *not* because it is a crime, but because it is a legal process that deprives you (hopefully temporarily) of your freedom.
"But here's an uncomfortable truth – it's a number of orders of magnitude worse in our community. In its current form .NET is for 40-year-old white men. That's the visual.""
What the heck is with the blatant racism?
Is there any other "visual" that it would be acceptable to refer to in this way, to indicate that something is just automatically repulsive?
It's one piece of evidence, that can be used among many. It might not even be used at trial, but simply to give police a lead.
Anyway, that vast majority of criminals are not nearly as smart as TV makes them out to be. And even smart ones make mistakes. This is just one tool in the toolbox.
"It’s not like getting support for a Microsoft issue is easy. I’ve spent hours and hours on the phone as the script-reading phone monkey exhausted went down his list before declaring defeat. They are no more legally responsible for solving your problem than some random Linux guy."
This.
MS doesn't have to fix your problem. No, you aren't going to sue MS. Fallacy of the false alternative.
I'd say that his gift here is a better choice than yet another Robert Byrd Pig Research Center (literal pork barrels). So there's that.
But that's not even the point. It's his money. Why *shouldn't* he decide where it goes?
Just how much of a special tax do you think Americans should be assessed to pay for Australian bush fires anyway? He handed over a huge chunk of cash to a need that isn't even in his country. The mature response is "thank you".
"And while none disclosed whether they had personally donated money to the same cause, that’s not the point."
It's not?
That's $690K (or whatever it was) more than I've donated to the bush fires (my donations have stayed closer to home).
He didn't have to give a dime, and had he not, we probably wouldn't be hearing about it on El Reg.
People need to grow up. Envy is a sad thing to let consume you.
You could, but that would mean a vast proportion of the population are criminals, and also there'd be a lot of missing money and stuff, etc.
Can't prove or disprove a negative, but it's not like there is a lot of mysterious evidence pointing to these supposed comic book criminal geniuses. The simplest explanation is that most criminals are pretty dumb.
You send resumes and important documents out in Word format? Why? Why not PDF?
But OK, let's say that a client or partner insists upon it for some asinine reason. You do realize that Word documents get corrupted all the time, right? That Word documents are often incompatible and differ in display and behavior between different versions of Word, right? That until competitors like LibreOffice basically forced them to change, that a Word file was basically a big ol binary memory dump, right?
"But that would be true of literally any descriptor used in that context. The problem with that scenario is the physical abuse, not that the attacker says "nerd" while doing it."
Hmm. Then why isn't that true of the words that *are* banned, which result in fines and imprisonment, etc.? Isn't the problem with *those* words the physical abuse, historical discrimination, etc.?
Um ... splitting space assets off into their own branch is no more inherently nonsensical than splitting the Army Air Corps off into the Air Force was.
But yes, "orange man bad" ... I can't argue with that, er, logic ...
Democrats (and country club Republicans) have been openly dying to impeach Trump since before he was even elected. They did not and do not care about "facts, evidence, testamony or the laws of the United States" (in your words) themselves; they were willing to use *any* reason they could dream up. (They seemed offended to actually need a reason, in fact.)
They tried inserting Trump into their own bizarre sexual fantasies, that didn't work. They tried the Russia Russia Russia thing, that didn't work. Now they are trying this, and it will only (halfway) "work", if it does, because they control the House.
They didn't and don't care in the slightest about the actual "charges", they have simply been baying for blood all along.
Yeah, he was actually complying, but the guy was still pistol whipping him and holding the gun right to his head.
Much like how it is with modern terrorists, it didn't appear that compliance was really all that safe of a course of action.
"On a totally unrelated note, I wonder what the jury members recent bank transaction look like?"
Believe what you like, I guess, but the idea that anything so blatant as that occurred is ludicrous.
There is simply a very, very high bar to defamation claims in US law, probably because of our whole bugaboo about not letting government (and damage awards from a court are government) restrain speech any more than necessary.
In this case, I can disagree with the outcome, but I can still see how it could happen. No fantasies about bribes are necessary.