Does this count? A C# dev kit for Visual Studio Code... that requires a Visual Studio licence.
And so it begins.
https://devblogs.microsoft.com/visualstudio/announcing-csharp-dev-kit-for-visual-studio-code/
1466 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Aug 2018
I've never understood what the business case for PowerShell actually was.
"Let's create another, totally incompatible shell that nobody knows how to use and then force people to use it whether they want to or not"
"Wouldn't it just be easier for the users, and cheaper for us, to improve the tools we already have?"
"Heresy! You're fired"
I have a sneaking suspicion that ditching Windows may be also have something to do with government paranoia. India's membership in the BRICS consortium and friendliness with China and Russia probably makes India believe that it's a top target for US surveillance - especially with their extensive use of English in government.
I've just bought a vintage keyboard from ebay - works perfectly. I'd be using it right now if it didn't desperately need a clean (job for later - no, it's not going in the dishwasher).
So how they are managing to make so much out of peripherals, I wonder? Maybe because everyone nowadays makes them to break irreparably almost the day after the warranty ends. Or worse, puts a one-way "recycle" setting on them and makes it way too easy to click...
Easy... make issuing or receiving any monetary bonus, stock award, or dividend from a company that has had a security breach in the last 12 months a felony with a minimum five-year term (along with stock buybacks for the same period). That would concentrate the mind wonderfully, as Samuel Johnson might have put it.
I mean, that'll never happen, of course, but it's nice to dream.
Ah yes, I remember technical manuals like that.
"Note: configuration of the switch may optionally cause reset of all ports. If you do not want this not to unhappen, please do not refrain from not excluding the omission of the --ignoredonotexcludeomitnoreset parameter (please note that --ignoredonotincludeomitnoreset is deprecated and will be ignored)"
Corbel is another one I can't stand. Tahoma was OK, but it's one of those that's tuned entirely for ClearType and looks awful unless you use only a specific point size and have MS' proprietary* font blurring turned on.
* although I seem to remember Steve Gibson did it first. Oh well.
Calibri and Cambria are both totally soulless. Times New Roman looks elegant on paper but on 72dpi old school monitors was really tiring to read. Ironic it was replaced just in time for true HDMI monitors coming in.
Well, I'm sure we'll all have to suffer another terrible Microsoft typeface for the next five years, until it's again replaced by something even more awful.
Anything even partially generated by AI is no longer protected by copyright. Include software, movies, music, books, tv shows, everything.
Then we can get back to using AI for things to make life for everyone better, rather than dumbing the arts down to a bland, grey pap.
"However, there is a clear disconnect here between law and technical reality."
That's a bit like inventing a new weapon that can kill someone, killing someone and then claiming that it's perfectly legal because the law as written didn't encompass the new reality of your new weapon.
Laws don't work that way. AI has some uncomfortable learning (and unlearning) to do, whether the shyster snake-oil-salesmen in charge of it like it or not.
Visual Studio being attacked is a new one. Although to be fair I know a lot of people don't patch it because Microsoft keep fiddling with it and there's a good chance you have to reset it after upgrading, meaning you have to reload all your extensions, your settings and so on - which takes about an hour or two, even if they are all synced on "the cloud" (something I do my best to avoid, to be honest.)
Variable by service and product.
Just off the top of my head in Microsoft's case that would probably be poorer quality of testing, leading to more bugs hitting production, more security alerts, slower turnaround on patching. More outages for Azure. Data loss in databases running on MSSQL.
In Twitter's case, outages, flaky APIs, users complaining of tweets double posting or not posting at all.
In the end - in all cases - users losing confidence in the brand and actively looking for alternatives. (In Twitter's case Mastodon, in Reddit's Lemmy/Raddle/etc)
So they're making massive profits and laying people off. That's not really a sensible solution - eventually you get overstretched and you can't maintain services any more.
If they're not careful they'll hit a tipping point, people start leaving and they can't maintain the services and the quality slips, the services slip. Seeing it now with Twitter, wonder how many people M$ needs to fire before they start circling the drain too?
That's exactly what Microsoft want, of course. Naturally they'll come up with a reason why Activision games can't work on the PlayStation within minutes of the takeover, and at that point htey'll pull the "Activision is too deeply embedded into Microsoft to spin off" defence (like Faceb**k did with WhatsApp and Instagram).
The big losers here are everyone that likes the Call of Duty series and everyone who refuses to buy an Xbox.
Surely the judge must have noticed the "we can spend Sony into oblivion*" email?
* words to that effect, probably.