Solving the wrong problem
Transmission losses on the way to the data centre are tiny compared to the power consumption within the data centre.
830 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Aug 2018
Getting empty Starships to the ISS will be easy in due course. Adding large cargo doors should be possible. The ISS modules will fit inside Starhips with room to spare. A de-orbit burn is easy. The big question is whether a Starship can handle re-entry and landing while it has a heavy ISS module inside.
A forest does store CO2. Individual trees die and release CO2, new trees grow in their place and absorb CO2. So long as the forest continues to be a forest its overall CO2 continues to be stored. Deforestation adds to overall atmospheric CO2, planting new forests has the opposite effect.
Sometimes shit happens and you have to deal with it, shit happened and they are dealing with it.
What I *REALLY* hope is now the Chinese will start to take space debris seriously, and implement their own rules for things like de-orbiting spent stages and not blowing stuff up on purpose.
Aside from that, I'm really impressed with their progress, space is hard and they are going places.
"Yes but the issue is the de-oorbit. SpaceX needs to demonstrate a reliable re-light of the engines on StarShip (really, really hate that name) to de-orbit it so it comes down where they need it to."
They have already demonstrated that, on both the most recent test flights. It landed on target both times, next to the bouy with the cameras. The last one even used its fins to curve around and completely change direction during the descent.
What is the airspeed velocity of a Mil Mi-26 carrying a space shuttle? Obviously a helicopter couldn't lift a shuttle, even if gripping it by the husk. You'd actually need FOUR of those helicopters to lift it, and a bit of twine strung between them. At least they don't have to carry it far: the river is only about 5 miles to the north.
I always assumed the big bang flung matter and antimatter in opposite directions. The matter came this way and the antimatter went that way. The antimatter side of the universe would be equally as large as the matter side: symmetry. Pity we can never see far enough to see the antimatter side. I am not an astrophysicist, obviously!