
Re: Most read/ commented
Drew, thanks for this, I really missed it.
Any chance of having it above Spotlight, rather than beneath it, please ?
222 publicly visible posts • joined 29 Aug 2007
There's an equivalent to this, if you're a T-Mobile customer. It's called TopApps. It is installed at some point after you fit the T-Mobile SIM, and the user can't remove it. It has all of the above, with the exception of 'modify battery statistics', and it nags every day about needing updates. I wish there was a way to permanently kill it.
Nobody has mentioned this company, which does surprise me.
Although what I have would appear to be no longer a current model, and it's got no tag to identify it, something similar is their Duel 26L.
I bought mine in 2008 for £70 (I think - it is 4 years ago), and it's still giving sterling service, having accompanied me all over the country since. It's capable of carrying a Thinkpad T60 (1680 x 1050) with all the bits, all the junk I carry around with me (and that's a lot) and 2/3 days worth of clothing. Only one thing I can fault it on, it only has a carrier for 1 water bottle, otherwise I couldn't recommend it highly enough.
Sorry, can't agree with that. Bought a Kobo Touch in March, after trying all three models on display in WH Smith.
Very pleased with the battery life, which does appear to be a week between charges, and page turns seem to take 0.5s.
Think I've spotted live ones in Currys as well. A small point, Kobo have promised, in writing, that they will NOT do an Amazon, once you've bought something, it stays bought, even if they have screwed up.
If this and the X are flops, maybe they'll think twice before making stupid decisions like non-removable battery, micro sim & no micro SD slot.
The V would appear to be a completely different phone, more like a Desire.
So I've gone with a Galaxy S II to replace my Desire, & will watch with interest over the next 2 years until my next renewal.
@ Shuflie
My understanding isn't flawed, (I think it a stupid move), but HTC's is :-
> Dear Dave Lawton,
> Thank you for your email regarding your HTC One X query.
> My name is David and I am a Technical Support Agent for the HTC Written Team.
> I understand that you wish to inquire why the HTC One X supports micro-SIM cards.
>
> I'm sorry to hear that you are not pleased with the introduction of micro SIMS to HTC phones.
> I do apologise Dave, but this is just the way this phone has been designed.
> Furthermore, micro SIM cards have a larger storage space than the standard SIM cards.
Not impressed with another manufacturers' buy in to Steve Jobs' stupid idea, nor the converters to make them back into standard size, whole idea is just a waste of time.
@ Kyoraki
I know that you have to remove the battery to change the card since I do own a Desire.
The problem with the One series is that it lacks even that internal slot :(
No SD slot, what were they thinking ?
Apparently they have used the micro-sim, because it has more memory than the standard sim,
That made me 90% certain that I wouldn't buy one, & the lack of the SD slot has done for the other 10%.
Any recommendations for a replacement for my Desire, contract renewal is due in a couple of weeks ?
It just isn't the same. I have a Samsung Dual SIM phone, a GT B5722, runs Bada, I think.
It just works (overworked phrase I know). Single dedicated button to switch between which SIM does the outgoing calls, both are live for incoming, does about a week between charges.
It's an old model, but the replacements are quite nice, and reasonably priced.
Usually have to be imported, but do what I did, & keep checking CEX shops & website.
Y'know, I always wondered why I could see better in the dark than most people.
Thanks for the illumination (pun intended).
Though fortunately mine are a sort of grey-blue, rather than light blue, so I can manage without sunglasses when it's overcast, but struggle even with them on a bright summer's day.
Don't do it people, it ain't worth it.
Like using the Android screen rendering engine.
I don't know what is in use ATM, but it's bloody awful compared to Stock, Dolphin, & Opera.
The other thing that springs to mind is the preferences section, which is abysmal compared to the desktop version.
</rant> There's other stuff, but that will do for now.
That's great to hear, can you quote some links please.
So the incidence of sunbathing induced skin cancer et al, should start to drop off.
The problem with all the fuss over climate change, is that it has drawn attention away from issues, which do need, and can be, tackled, like pollution from our 'highly technological society'.
And no, I don't have answers, but would suggest a read of the 'Seafort' series, starting at the beginning (it's SF), for a possible scenario, if we don't tackle it.
> Wrong... the iplayer can run fine on an iPad (there's an app for that!)
Did you read wot I wrote ?
iPlayer (Flash) for Linux, Mac, & Windows was the thing I was asking about.
If a dedicated application can be produced for iPad, & Android, how come we still have to use the Flash crap.
I don't believe a word of it. I still don't know anyone, either friends family or colleagues, who has a tablet of any description. It won't stay that way forever, but as tablets are a very new market compared to the other platforms, it doesn't take many people starting watching iPlayer on their iPad to get a growth rate of 67%.
Please forgive my inattention, since iPlayer (Flash) can't run on the iPad, then it has to be a 'native' app, so why is the mainstream version still Flash based ?
I tried this browser last year, when it didn't have nested bookmarks, found a few other issues, reported them to the support team, who couldn't even be bothered to reply, let alone actually help.
Could never understand why it couldn't be the default browser, instead it used to ask to be the default for every page opened. That might be an Android issue, but I don't think so since FF4 doesn't do it.
95% Na, more like 60%
Gave up on it at that point.
> Also, if Apple are putting ARM stuff in their iPhones, iPads etc, this will be great for them
iPhones, iPads do already, and have only ever used, ARM based processors, like 90-odd % of the mobile devices available.
I don't understand why, but there seems to be a great reluctance to say this by device, and chip, manufacturers.
I can't remeber the exact figures, but combined ARM shipments is ~ 100x Intel's, and there are already 2 ARM devices in use for every person on the planet.
OK, this will only be of use if you are fairly close to Doncaster in South Yorkshire.
However it might be true of other branches.
Several of the assistants in HMV were more than happy to demonstrate, had a demonstrator unit already set-up, were knowledgeable about it, allowed the end user to try it out (for around 15 minutes), and were not pushy when it became obvious that the purchase wouldn't happen that day.
Excellent customer service.
I didn't suffer from any eye-strain, or nausea from the 15 minutes I used it for, but I did find the 3D effect very position sensitive.
HTH
"It all started when MS ditched the home market DOS based OS and consolidated on the NT platform with XP. Prior to this, people who wrote software for the NT platform understood that it was a network based OS with tightly regimented ACLs, and if they didn't take this into account, their software would not work."
Let me re-write this for you.
"Prior to this, even Microsoft wrote software for the NT platform which didn't take into account the likelihood of tightly regimented ACLs, and this software would not work unless it ran with administrator privileges."
There, fixed the reality for you.