Hard disks stuck at 3.5" - why?
One thing I simply don't get is why HDD manufacturers are still sticking to the 3.5" disk format. I mean, let's face it - spinning rust lost the speed race to SSDs years ago. It's main and key advantage is capacity/price, which SSDs simply can't touch for now. I don't buy drives like these 10 TB here for speed, but for lot's of cheap space, and I can always use more. So, why not go back to, let's say, 5.25 inch format platters, which offer an ~ 80% larger area (3.5 inch disks are actually a bit over 3.7 inches, and 5.25 disks are about 5.1 inch in diameter). These larger disks fell into disfavor due to higher loads on the motors and spindles and worse thermals many years ago, BUT, that was long before we had current disk materials and He-filled drives that enable thinner, lighter disks and reduced friction. Plus, current bays for 3.5 inch drives (except laptops) are 5.25 inch bays, after all, so they would fit in my existing racks or NASs. So, Toshiba, WD, Seagate & Co., how about it? Instead of a 10 TB capacity, we'd instantly go to 18 TB, sticking to PMR. Thoughts, Comments?