Re: When you wish upon a star
As the Reg article pulls out,...That is not the mental image I needed this almost-morning. I'd much rather imagine the article pointing out, instead.
497 publicly visible posts • joined 23 Apr 2018
Another possibility that comes to mind is that maybe the desk opening into which the keyboard slid might not have been a straight horizontal line. If it were curved downward near the edges, an effect I could imagine some posh and/or antique desks having, that could explain it hitting the key there.
When I were a lad, I developed my own balanced ternary (or trinary, as I called it at the time) arithmetic well before I heard of Setun or any other implementations. (I didn't really expect it was something new to the world, but I knew I hadn't seen it elsewhere.) It actually has some surprising advantages, especially when it comes to long division. And of course, there's the aforementioned (by phuzz, in another comment thread) base efficiency, although I didn't know about that until that kind of thing became something one could read about on the Web.
I knew this sounded familiar. Huston should talk to this guy, Christiaans. (Of course, it's quite possible he already has.)
In the US, it can be taken either way, either 'discarded' or, as in this case (presumably), 'put forth', 'proffered', something like that. But it is more often used in the 'discarded' sense over there, too.
At least there aren't any worries over conflating it with the 'tosser' kind of tossing over there.
I'll belatedly add, since this post is the first result that came up on Bing (*spit*) when I searched for this kind of thing, that the < span class="strike" > is now replaced by a simple < s >.
Also, the < q > tag seems to have been added, and I don't even know what that is. Maybe shorthand for < blockquote >? Let's find out.
No, it enclosed it in quotation marks. Curly ones, by the looks of things, and probably semantically helpful for those using screenreaders and similar. Nice.
By my reading, I think that it was just the cruise control or maybe speed excess warning that was borked,* not the speedometer itself. But the 'and instrument systems' is rather vague; it includes speedometer, of course, but it's not 'all instrument systems'.
* hence the "no assurance of adherence to speed limits."
From The Seventy Maxims of Maximally Effective Mercenaries:
2. A Sergeant in motion outranks a Lieutenant who doesn't know what's going on.3. An ordnance technician at a dead run outranks everybody.
Just yesterday, I was mentioning to my wife about Word's 40th birthday, and she asked if Clippy was there. I confidently answered in the negative, but it seems I may have been mistaken. Or if not Clippy proper, at least his ghost, back to haunt us.