* Posts by Joaney I've

6 publicly visible posts • joined 3 Apr 2018

Furious gunwoman opens fire at YouTube HQ, three people shot

Joaney I've

Re: Of all places

Let's keep in mind that the NRA isn't a club for all the good ol' guys who have playing with guns as a harmless hobby. It's an industry lobby body primarily representing companies that make more profit the more guns are sold. This made it worth their while, for example, to donate $30M to Trump's campaign. Not, of course, that they would expect to influence future laws by doing so. Of course not. They were just being kind and generous to fellow human beings.

Joaney I've

Re: Of all places

>>"Anything else (laws, etc.) is just feel-good fluff."

>Do, please, tell us why then this is a major problem in America and in no other developed country.

Perhaps 'murica is still in fairly early stages of its development?

Why a merged Apple OS is one mash-up too far

Joaney I've

Re: I dislike the idea of a converged UI...however

>"if there's anyone who can make it work, it's Apple."

>

>The Apple that possessed that sort of magic stopped existing a few years back.

Did such magic ever exist except as part of Magic Thinking?

My experience is that Apple have always made as much carp and as much good stuff as most other system creators (or tweakers of others' systems, in Apple's case), but they have an audience that is unusually susceptible to bull**** about who was the creative force.

Joaney I've

Re: Apple could have made a Touch Mac years ago

>Apple has been hampered in recent years by the failure of Intel to

So Intel regards its mission to be not hampering Apple?

And it's failed in recent years?

Interesting perspective.

Joaney I've

Re: Apple could have made a Touch Mac years ago

>Taking control of the CPU design is the next logical step for them.

Taking control of the tweaks to the CPU design that was created by ARM and licensed by Apple with License To Tweak?

Joaney I've

Re: re not such a big deal

>>It's not as big a deal with such an OS to change the top layer, the UI,

>given the difficulties that Canonical trying to make a new Top layer/UI had I tend to thing that it is a bit harder than most people think it is.

It wasn't that changing a layer in a well-architected system was difficult. It was that the new design chosen for the layer was 'sub-optimal'.