Yeah, I Experienced the Outage in Suburban Baltimore
I figured that it was the Internet Gods telling me to go the f%$3 to sleep.
194 publicly visible posts • joined 3 Jan 2018
The donate page for Wordpress.org says, "The WordPress Foundation is a 501(c)3 non-profit organization (Federal tax ID 20-5498932)."
I'm not a programmer, my coding is so ugly that it kills tardigraves, but I did incorporate a 501(C)3 back in the day,
It appears to me that Mullenweg, by using the not-for-profit to enrich his for-profit company is engaging in inurement, which is a violation of IRS regulations on the subject.
https://www.irs.gov/charities-non-profits/charitable-organizations/inurement-private-benefit-charitable-organizations
"A section 501(c)(3) organization must not be organized or operated for the benefit of private interests, such as the creator or the creator's family, shareholders of the organization, other designated individuals, or persons controlled directly or indirectly by such private interests. No part of the net earnings of a section 501(c)(3) organization may inure to the benefit of any private shareholder or individual. A private shareholder or individual is a person having a personal and private interest in the activities of the organization."
This sounds to me like a violation of black letter charity law, though I am a mechanical engineer, not a lawyer, dammit. (Yes I just went Dr. McCoy)
BTW, there IS a, "Special patent court," but it only hears appeals. It is called the, "U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit," for various obscure historical reasons.
They are way worse than the mooks in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, ruling in favor of things like patenting a rainy day. (Hedging against weather, but since hedging is prior art, it means that they literally granted a patent for a rainy day.)
Among other things the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit have, made determinations of fact, a no-no for appellate courts, who are only supposed to rule on matters of law, and assumed facts not in evidence.
The Supreme Court has been slapping them down the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit for over a decade.
These folks are nuts.
I think that this crap is just an overengineered ELIZA program.
That being said, if machine learning is learning, and to be clear I do NOT think that it is learning, then teaching an AI should be an acceptable use of the material.
Much like wannabee standup comics will teach themselves to by reading the joke books of current comments, and watching their performances on YouTube, the AI is teaching itself, which is the purpose of these works.
How is, "Teaching an AI is a violation of copyright," when, "Teaching a person," is not?
Again, if, as I believe, this is not intelligence in any form, and just a mixmaster of gibberish, then the issue is not IP infringement, but rather that the AI companies are defrauding people.
My first reaction was to run away from Rust.
It's not that I do not think that the various TLAs are not technically astute, they are, it's that my paranoid mind thinks that if they like it, they have a back door in the software big enough to drive Elon Musk's ego through.