McKinsey Selling Useless Junk?
Isn't that their whole corporate ethos?
205 publicly visible posts • joined 3 Jan 2018
McKinsey is in the business of generating numbers of dubious provenance to justify the inevitable, whether it be layoffs to boost senior management stock options, helping Purdue Pharma get America hooked on opioids, or helping politically connected
The donate page for Wordpress.org says, "The WordPress Foundation is a 501(c)3 non-profit organization (Federal tax ID 20-5498932)."
I'm not a programmer, my coding is so ugly that it kills tardigraves, but I did incorporate a 501(C)3 back in the day,
It appears to me that Mullenweg, by using the not-for-profit to enrich his for-profit company is engaging in inurement, which is a violation of IRS regulations on the subject.
https://www.irs.gov/charities-non-profits/charitable-organizations/inurement-private-benefit-charitable-organizations
"A section 501(c)(3) organization must not be organized or operated for the benefit of private interests, such as the creator or the creator's family, shareholders of the organization, other designated individuals, or persons controlled directly or indirectly by such private interests. No part of the net earnings of a section 501(c)(3) organization may inure to the benefit of any private shareholder or individual. A private shareholder or individual is a person having a personal and private interest in the activities of the organization."
This sounds to me like a violation of black letter charity law, though I am a mechanical engineer, not a lawyer, dammit. (Yes I just went Dr. McCoy)
BTW, there IS a, "Special patent court," but it only hears appeals. It is called the, "U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit," for various obscure historical reasons.
They are way worse than the mooks in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, ruling in favor of things like patenting a rainy day. (Hedging against weather, but since hedging is prior art, it means that they literally granted a patent for a rainy day.)
Among other things the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit have, made determinations of fact, a no-no for appellate courts, who are only supposed to rule on matters of law, and assumed facts not in evidence.
The Supreme Court has been slapping them down the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit for over a decade.
These folks are nuts.