
It looks like kudos to everyone involved - Mozilla and Radically Open Security for finding it, CERT for publicising it, iTerm for quickly fixing it and El Reg for letting us commentards know about the update.
85 publicly visible posts • joined 27 Nov 2017
Thank you for the reference. However the article concludes (my emphasis):
- The council overwhelmingly decides by consensus, which means the **UK is on the winning majority side almost 87% of the time**.
- The UK government might be more willing than other governments to publicly register its opposition to EU decisions.
- The data does not tell us what went on behind the scenes on each of these issues, and hence how much the UK disagreed with the majority position when it recorded its opposition – perhaps the UK was on the winning side on all the key issues it really cared about in this period.
"I thought it was *PERFECT* and a *SOLID* example of how you deal with bullying"
I sincerely hope that you are not involved in any way in dealing with children or young people!!
Of course bullying is a terrible thing and needs to be dealt with robustly, but your proposed solution is ill-informed, unlikely to succeed and frankly barbaric.
The image of the bully as an empowered sadist does not reflect reality in my experience (primary school governor for 20 years). More often than not the bully is him/herself being bullied or abused at home. (Go on a local authority safeguarding training course if you want to hear some truly horrific case studies.)
All they will learn from your approach is how to become even more violent and will likely end up as an adult doing someone some serious harm. A more nuanced approach will still protect the victim but also may be able to turn the bully around from the path they have taken.
I look forward to all the well-informed, courteous and adult and response to this post...
I really struggle with the argument "we got by before we were in the EU, so we'll get by once we're out of it." The world has changed massively since then, and we have changed in step with that (for better or worse). We are now proposing to yank ourselves back in time fifty years over the space of a weekend.
It's like saying that we could travel just as fast around London in the Victorian era as we can now, so suddenly taking all the buses, cars and taxis off the road would be absolutely fine. But we' be knee-deep in horseshit for a start...
"IMHO, because of this, Chrome should be banned from the appStore until they behave properly"
I'm not at my Mac at the moment, but IIRC Chrome is installed on Mac by downloading a .dmg, not through the MacOS App Store. So the only control Apple has is to somehow remove it from their list of signed software (which is easily circumvented).
"The Advertising Standards Authority was alerted after Reg reader Rich Campbell noticed the TV broadcast's voice-over speeds did not match the ones promoted in the text"
I'm guess Reg reader Rich Campbell will start getting speeds of about 500kbps from TalkTalk pretty soon...
I've co-authored an IT book and will have received a (small) royalty for every copy sold electronically. Am I now going to have the royalties deducted from my next royalty payment, even though people will have read our book? It's not exactly a life-changer but it doesn't seem fair to me.
I was at BCCI as part of the IT team supporting the auditors who went in to try and find out what happened. BCCI was very different to what seems to have happened at Barings: BCCI's owners were just stupendously, shamelessly, universally corrupt. They were taking millions out of the accounts and putting it into their own pockets and nobody stopped them until the money ran out. They all escaped abroad AFAIK. The less corrupt ones would take money out on a Friday night, invest it over the weekend and put it back in on Monday without anyone noticing.
Weak regulation and a mind-blowing lack of oversight let all this happen.
The saddest thing was that the staff left behind (business and IT) were required to keep all their money in BCCI accounts. These were ordinary people who lost everything - cash, savings, pensions, the lot. Tragic.
I get a lot of LinkedIn crap (I only use it when changing jobs tbh) and about a year ago I received a request from a young attractive blonde woman who I didn't know.
Nothing particularly unusual there, but her job was as a Geography teacher at my kids' secondary school. I'm also a school governor (elsewhere) so I thought maybe she was a real person who was a staff governor. But when I checked with my kids, they said there was no-one of that name who worked at the school and she didn't appear on the school's website.
It took LinkedIn a good six months to remove her from the site, and bizarrely, I saw that some of my more gullible work colleagues (definitely not connected with the school) had actually connected with her.
I am still trying to work out how the scammers knew which school my kids go to. (They're not connected with me on LinkedIn because, well, they have better things to do with their time)
"I had an Economics teacher who would muse how much fun it would be if cash was made from radioactive isotopes with a short half-life... to see what might happen to consumer spending habits if everyone knew they had to dispose of their pay packet before it blinked out of existence"
I think Germany ended up trying something similar between the wars - it didn't end well IIRC...
School governor here... we don't have this problem so much but we do have a small stupid minority of parents who dangerously and illegally park their cars on the zig-zag lines outside school. Personally I would set fire to their cars, but our patient and long-suffering head teacher tells me that we're not allowed to do that.
You can get the police to come along once or twice a year (they're pretty busy apparently), you can get patrols of parents and kids to talk to miscreants (avoiding the occasional threats of violence) but after that there's not much more you can do. Until a child is killed or injured (thank God that has not happened yet) at which point the full force of the law will of course descend.
Very depressing that a small minority of lazy idiots can spoil it for the rest of us.
It's not AI - it can't be because we don't even understand what intelligence is in humans, never mind in machines.
It's not Machine Learning, because we don't really understand what learning is in humans either, never mind in machines. (I'm speaking as a school governor who spends a lot of time with teachers, many of whom are excellent, a few not so much. It's really complicated. If you could distill the essence of a really good teacher someone would have done it by now.)
It's just advanced pattern recognition, operating from very large but inevitably biased and flawed data sets.
| there was some process on the planet that the scientists failed to account for. And it turned out to be pretty impressive winds
"And will this wind... be so mighty... as to lay low... the mountains of the Earth?"
https://youtu.be/-hJQ18S6aag
(apologies if the URL is wrong, I typed it in by hand)
IANAL but I am a school governor and I can assure you that he is unlikely to ever get a senior leadership job in teaching again.
As part of standard school recruitment practices (known as Safer Recruitment) every candidate undergoes a background check, including a DBS which would bring up his record.
Given the circumstances of his offence it's unlikely he would even be called for an interview.