Re: Live by the sword, die by the sword.
But "Die by the Sword" is a warrior ability.
101 publicly visible posts • joined 27 Oct 2017
That's giving a lot of credit to
1) The manager for having the correct metrics to truly judge if the employees' "side projects" are actually useful and
2) The employees doing "something" extra without neglecting their original responsibilities for additional visibility to management and leaving the other 8 to pick up the operational slack
In many cases, the 8 people doing the job of 10 are more deserving of promotion than the 2 twats working on some "revolutionary" bullshit.
The low cost per hour is irrelevant if you can get the same utility & entertainment for half the price. No one is arguing that buying a smart phone isn't useful. The argument is that out of 30-50 cents/hour, you're paying 15-25 cents per hour for a logo (and the "design", and the notch, and the 56 cameras, and the "battery life", and the... bla bla bla, I've had both).
The fear over World of Warcraft is about the independent subscription vs Gamepass.
Not sure how much it could change things, but it could make WoW cheaper on Windows than Mac.
WoW players on the other hand fear what could happen if WoW through the Gamepass isn't profitable enough for MS, and what that does to the in-game shop (which is currently only cosmetic).
On the other hand, it's often advised to not hold too much of your employer's stock in your 401k. You already "invest" your future earnings in the company so it is better to diversify into, for example, an index fund. It's also a gamble that your employer will outperform the market during your entire career.
And then you find a site that tabs out to invisible fields and you curse the developer and all his ancestors. Worst if it happens between username and password, but also bad if it happens from address bar to the first useful field.
Sidenote: the fact that F6 on most modern browsers selects the entire address field is probably the most life-changing thing I learned in the past 5 years.
I agree with the sentiment, but you have to fix the underlying cause first. Record holders for this type of thing are disproportionately male because they historically had more opportunities. If this is fixed and women are given the same opportunities to break records and pass milestones, then the distinction becomes unnecessary. Until then, women deserve recognition for making these achievements despite the odds stacked against them. No one would write/publish/read an article titled "person fails to break longest spaceflight record".
The point of the article isn't that we shouldn't use it, it's that we have to be careful with it.
Current (dumb) AI is so good at finding garbage that we risk spending more time debunking its findings than developing new and actually useful methods of finding alien life.
"As I was making a 90-degree turn to park, your record would certainly show that I pressed the breaks [sic] during the turn. The only way I could have put the car in the high acceleration - that my wife and I noticed - would be that I lifted my feet[sic? I only use one foot at a time on a given pedal] from the break [sic] and instantly pressed very hard on the accelerated [sic] paddle[sic]. I cant[sic] understand how that be[sic] feasible. If the record does not show this precise pattern, than[sic] it points to a potential software flaw."
I'd send it to corrections, but it's mainly mocking the petitioner.