Thumbs up...
..for using a TouchPad running webOS as the icon on the top stories on the homepage :-)
146 publicly visible posts • joined 22 Aug 2007
"Perhaps HP doesn't care, and is simply trying to get rid of its few remaining stocks of TouchPads."
This theory doesn't make any sense at all. HP promised more TP's would be built, and they were. They had a backlog of orders for this second run, and most of these customers were sent away empty handed because HP didn't have enough stock.
If these TPs weren't reserved specifically for developers, why didn't they just allocate them to existing orders?
Blackberry's recend ads push "Touch. Type. Together", which is what the Palm Pre and its successors did well.
The playbook, and likely BB's future QNX based phones, have a copy of webOS's cards.
And here, they're launching a portrait slider.
If imitation is the sincerest form of flattery, the original Palm/webOS team should be feeling very flattered ;-)
Can you really say anything with such conviction?
Who knows what they'll do. Hell, maybe they'll try and resurrect PalmOS. HP's behaviour since hiring Leo is so bizarre, anything is possible.
It makes me wonder if Leo was on Dell's payroll all along, and if he arrived in a giant wooden horse...
> Terrible video codec support
Only in the bundled player. There are apps in both preware and the app catalog that play most formats.
> Laggy scrolling in the browser and occasional lock ups.
Set logging to minimal, then install all the log disable patches from preware = speedy, non laggy tablet.
> The full price simply wasn't worth it.
This is true.
> Now it's dirt cheap, I have one!
Me too :-)
It never ceases to amaze me that the software, music and movie industries never realise that copy protection and DRM only inconvenience their legitimate customers. Every copy protection method and DRM gets broken or worked around, and the pirates never even see it. They don't see the warnings, either, just the content.
The software industry has had decades to learn this; no matter how clever the DRM programmers are, there seem to be a huge number of very clever people out there with too much free time on their hands who make it their mission to break the protection.
I remember when Robocop 3 came out for the Amiga, the publishers claimed it was "uncopyable". It took something like a day for the pirate copy to spread.
I've not looked myself, but i've heard that DRM-free pirate copies of Spore are relatively easy to come across.
So all this effort, all this legal trouble, all this customer discontent, for a system which has proved a total waste of time and who only their paying customers have to deal with.
Nice one EA. Well done.
Why not do the following:
1) Place a link next to search results saying "Scan for malware", and the user can then optionally scan the links he is actually likely to visit.
2) If malware is found, make it possible for the client to send a report back to AVG to add that URL to a known malware database, which is sent out with the updates.
I doubt ISPs forcing IPv6 on everyone will cause any kind of problem for people with oeprating systems that don't support it. I have several Amigas connected to my broadband, and i doubt they'll get IPv6 in time, but i'm not worried.
Right now my ADSL router maps internet connections to local machines via NAT. This could still work even if the machines on my LAN are IPv4 and the routers WAN IP address is IPv6.
I've had Sky broadband more-or-less since it launched. The first thing i did when i got my sky broadband router was put the manual and CD in a draw (i never install ISP provided software), found the IP address of the router from the IP it gave my laptop via DHCP, guessed the admin login (admin/sky), changed from WEP to WPA, changed the SSID, changed the WiFI password, changed the admin password, disabled DHCP, enabled MAC filtering etc. etc.
But how many of sky's customers even know how to change router settings? A lot of folks get the box, plug it in and trust the ISP to know what they're doing.
"a problem caused by an archaic notion of distribution as being tied to a diskette or CD"
If I was to make my own branch of a GPL webserver called "Super Banana" and hosted a website on Super Banana, people could retrieve webpages from my Super Banana server. However, I havent given the binaries of Super Banana to anyone, be it by disk or CD, *or even over the internet*, so would I have to make the changes public?