Re: Homegrown ceramics - aside heating mugs
Just don't mention the toothbrush!
576 publicly visible posts • joined 12 Oct 2017
The story does say that the prison was run by the police department, not the local DoC, and Carl was directed to the holding section, both of which would indicate it was not for convicted/sentenced prisoners and, as such, would likely have both male and female guests. Also, it didn't actually mention male prisoners anywhere.
I had a Domino 5 server on 460ish days on NT4, many years back, it only got rebooted because, after realising it was out of warranty, the client realised some maintenance and patching might be in order. Otherwise, the thing would just run and run (think Mo Farah, not Pheidippades)
A former colleague* announced with glee one morning that he'd received an email informing him he'd won some millions on the Dutch lottery, which he could claim by calling a number and giving some personal details.
Once the laughter had subsided, we finally convinced him that it was a hoax.
The beauty of this? Our team ran client email systems including anti-spam/anti-phish...
*Quote from the same bloke: "But cider's not alcohol, that's why kids drink it in the park..." Oh deary deary me
-------------> Not cider
now we have TV channels showing Xmas films from the begining of Sept!
Hallmark Channel run a "Christmas in July" season in the UK.
It's painful. Career woman suffers personal or professional loss, goes back to hometown to lick her wounds/comfort family/bury dead dog, stays, meets high school tormentor/crush/sweetheart, who's now a widower/teacher/spoon-whittler... you know the rest
Please give me a rusty spoon to stabby stabby stab my eyes
or copious --->
One can always find an anecdote about certain individuals' poor performance and use it to denigrrate an entire class of people. Does Beverley Allitt represent all nurses? Paula Vennells all Post Office staff?
NHS administrators I've known have been ridiculously overworked, keeping clinicians free from paperwork burdens (purchasing, performance/outcome stats are not things a surgeon needs to be focusing on), and fighting for their particular Trust in the face of overwhelming demands.
The ire should be focused on that small percentage of corner office numpties who think their private sector genius applies equally to public sector, bringing inb consultants suffering from the same "private sector good, public sector bad" myopia that's been about as helpful to the NHS as MRSA.
Back when I was in DoH as a young appdev, we had a contractor on our team, fresh from being 'released' from a spell at, yep, Royal Mail. I and my boss had prepared a business case for a small piece of work and passed it to him for his thoughts. His first comment was "yes, but where do you make the profit?" In a central government department. After a substantial conversation, he still couldn't understand why our team wasn't charging another part of the same government department an overhead to bump up our "revenue". We didn't renew his contract (also, I ended up teaching him sttuff, which wass the opposite of why he was brought in in the first place).
My point is that the NHS relies on a vast number of people in all sorts of roles, and all of them understaffed and undermined. Yes, mistakes happen, some of them fatally, but none of them, or at least, barely enough to register statistically, driven by an attitude of "ah, fuck it, that'll do", can't be arsed, lack of effort.
But employing people to ensure public sector bills are paid swiftly, and contracts are agreed frugally seems to attract ire from various gobshites bemoaning "useless bureaucrats". They're not, they hold external suppliers' feet to the fire to ensue value for the taxpayer. The stories of waste that make the press are the exceptions, or ones where there is actual malfeasance.
In practice, there are dishonest people in the world who will withhold payment until forced to pay up
Not just people, global household name companies, as a former employer, a boutique consultancy, found out when screwed by a client ducking out on a £2mn bill; peanuts for them, layoffs for us, as we couldn't afford the legal fees.
Even delaying paying an invoice, say, taking 90 days instead of the contractual 30, can send a small firm under, but for the big boys, it's just standard practice.
Chapeau to those public/non-profit sector orgs that pay up on time.
This all seems very Home Office. There's a large element at HO who've been after this for years and years. They know that they can never get it through with a Tory government, as it'll be seen as a right wing move that voters will baulk at. Instead, the policy hawks wait to float it until there's a Labour govt.
A lot depends on how quickly a Home Sec 'goes native' - obviously, Shabana Mahmood and her SpAds have turned pretty quickly.
And you won't get much disagreement from me on that one. The companies lower down the food/supply chain presumably have contracts in place, so if JLR/$stricken_corp can't fulfill their side of the bargain, it would be on the side of the supplier to take action to enforce that contract.
However, bigger corps can usually ride out the cost of litigation, which the supplier can't.
A previous employer got fucked by this in the 00s, a boutique consultancy screwed to the tune of £2.5m, which is a lot for a company of 15 people, by a global telecomms company.
They could afford it, we couldn't, so a third of us were laid off.
I'm not quite sure of the rationale behind asking for "covid-style" government support, here. Covid was a pandemic affecting the entire world, so all governments stepped in, to some degree or another, as it was, for businesses, unforeseeable and unpreventable.
This is a single, albeit large, company, whose systems were compromised by a deliberate act, systems which arguably should have been more secure. That is, Stellantis have to shoulder some of the responsibility, and/or have contingency funding in place for mitigation and supporting employees and companies in the supply and distribution/sales chains. If that contingency is in the form of insurance so be it, and they should be able to prove all reasonable measures (plus some unreasonable ones) were taken to prevent such an event.
If that's not the case, and either the contingency isn't there or the insurers dispute the claim (and fight through the courts for 5+ years), than that could be seen as a breach of fiduciary duty on the part of the board. Shareholders should (but won't) also be required to put their hands in their pockets or, at the very least, give up on a dividend for the year(s).
At no point do I see a duty on the part of government, any government in whose jusrisdiction Stellantis has production facilities, to step in and cover for the company's, shall we say, current misfortunes.
Gah, Jake, I normally like and appreciate your posts, even if I disagree with you, but...
Starting a comment with 'methinks'?
The late lamented Clive James would not be impressed.
Not only that, Simon, but RegTards normally are in a position to provide a much more detailed piece than mainstream rolling news outlets can afford - they don't have the bandwidth to go into detail in a half hour rolling news schedule, whereas El Reg can, and are much valued for it.
[reposted, first attempt got lost]
I can think of at least three reasons why that was a terrible configuration from a Domino pov off the top of my head: no site doc; no clustering; CNAME is dumbass in Domino... If I scratched my head a bit, I could probably think of more.
At the root of it, though, is that it looks like it was designed and configured by someone who should never have been let loose in the Domino Directory. If that was the deceased, well, I'm sorry for his family, but it doesn't excuse a terrible configuration.
20 Fenchurch Street, aka the Walkie Talkie, is like that, with the wind against whichever direction you're wealking (or so it seems, going to and from buying lunch)
There are also houses that don't exist