> Readers with long memories
With the current memory prices you'll have to be rich to afford a long memory...
4563 publicly visible posts • joined 9 Oct 2017
> I'm hoping by answering no, they'll stop calling. But they may not be bright enough even for that.
Unfortunately the actual calling is done by a computer which randomly picks numbers out of a list (or creates them randomly?). Humans (or what passes as such in that profession) are only put in the loop when a potential victim has been hooked by the computer, so there is no way to discourage them, they will keep calling, again and again.
(Had a relative who had a terrible nuisance call problem, with dozens of repeat calls each day. The only thing which eventually worked was changing the telephone number.)
Don't know which version of Windows you have, but Win11 has an option to *not* to reboot during "working hours" (which you can set yourself). Of course it will update anyway, but that shouldn't be a problem (a gaming PC should have CPU cycles to spare) - I just won't reboot smack in the middle of something.
Not an OS, but Dell: Their software is a nightmare, and its updates take usually the better part of half an hour -- when they succeed (i.e. usually on the third attempt, meaning 1.5 hour lost to upgrade their stupid manager software (without which your laptop fans won't ever turn on, even when the room starts smelling of overheated PCB). They too have mastered the art of surrealistic progress reports in non-linear time.
^ This!!
A good computer GUI is a tool to quickly and efficiently execute commands it would take far too long to spell out (by text or even voice): One single click should amount to 10 words (not) written/spoken.
Disclaimer: I've still got two hands with 10 fingers (total, not each), so pushing on little plastic squares is no problem for me. YMMV of course.
> In which case let's not waste our time telling our politicians at every & any oppurtunity what we do & don't want.
That's a good example of the so-called "package-deal fallacy": There is no reason why not believing politicians should prevent us from telling them our expectations. Apples & oranges...
> interviewing 0.003623188% of the target group and then claiming an accuracy of +/-2% is a bit of a stretch
Why? The accuracy is certainly about the interviewed, not about the rest of the population.
Nobody would claim "I can predict with 2% accuracy what people I've never spoken to would have answered", unless you claim to be a psychic mind reader...
> saying they'll put a stop to it
Preelectoral promises are never binding, as (wherever you're living) you might have noticed by now. And since privacy is against any government's interests (keeping tabs on the unruly masses), if somebody actually said it they would be brazenly lying in your face.
> even though I never answered a caller ID number I didn't recognize, they still kept at it
Doesn't matter. Your number was in their database, and a computer randomly selected it every now and then, called it automatically, and would had handed the call to a human (probably) if you had answered. Since you didn't answer, the number was put back in the "to be called" pool.
It's like with spam and email addresses: Once a phone number is in the "potential prospects" database, you will never ever find peace. My cousin was in that situation too: Despite never answering, her phone rang non-stop in the early morning, midday and late afternoon, times spammers though somebody might be home. Like you, she only found peace after changing her number.
> the penalties are set are based upon fixed penalties
The penalties are set to numbers looking good in a headline. As I said earlier they won't be paid anyway, so at least they need to look good: Not too low, but still credible for the average reader (190k is a lot of money for average people, even if it's just pocket change for a millionaire or a big company).
> 25p per call
They won't pay, they will simply scuttle the company and create a new one (if they haven't already created it). It's the standard procedure, so it doesn't really matter if you fine them 1 penny or a trillion pounds, they won't pay either.
The only way to stop them is to fine the CEO (better, put him in jail and throw away the key).
> looking at their laptops many do say AI
It's the new must-have marketing argument, so I doubt you'll find any PC openly admitting it's stunted and will destroy your life [1].
[1] Not having AI condemns you to lower productivity, ergo poverty. Not to mention your friends will henceforth shun you, your spouse will leave you, and your kids will start taking hard drugs to forget what a failure you are.
Disclaimer: Above statement(s) is/are an example of "sarcasm", shouldn't be taken literally and don't reflect my personal opinion.
> Oh, the important stuff is still in Windows 11
But impossible to find for the uninitiated. Windows users used to make fun of the cryptic Linux commands one simply had to know, but nowadays Windows is about as user-friendly as start-of-the-century Linuxes.
Example? Due to ongoing problems to update to 24H1 and beyond I wanted to check my TPM settings. It took me hours of Internet search to eventually find the secret code "tpm.msc". Obvious you could say, but then again you clearly do this for a living, I don't... For me MSc is a "Master of Science"... :-D
> You can activate Bitlocker without TPM.
Thanks, but actually I don't want it, because I'm also accessing that HD from Linux (which is my main driver, Windows is only there for firmware updates and a couple games). I just wonder about the reasons why things which should work (like Windows Update), actually stop doing so at some point.
House of cards, as I said. *shrug*
> I'm not convinced
Because you use a different metric. XP was excellent from an ease-of-use point of view. It had a simple logic (like, all settings are in "Settings", grouped in clear and logical categories), and it stuck to it, which means that even those rare few who don't work in IT for a living were able to master it after a month or two (elderly aunt for instance, historian by profession).
Now specs-wise Win11 might be better, but from the aforementioned ease-of-use point of view it is totally crap. I've been using Windowses from v.3 on (skipped Vista, 8 and 10), and yet I'm lost when I have to change some fairly basic setting in Win11, or understand why something isn't working as advertised. I don't care about the specs, I just need to get work done, and that was easier in XP.
(Didn't downvote you though.)
Well, I have a similar problem: 12th Gen Intel Core i7-12700H, TPM 2, and this Dell laptop actually shipped with Win11 preinstalled, so one should assume there are no compatibility problems...
But it won't upgrade beyond Win11 23H2 or use Bitlocker, because "PCR7 binding is not supported" (yet Device Manager says "TPM 2.0 on Microsoft ACPI-Compliant System" is working properly...).
Go figure.
My point is, Windows is a house of cards.
What would be more fitting for the American secret services than a phone 150% made in the USA by honest, god-fearing, hardworking American workers?...
Disclaimer: Above statement(s) is/are an example of "sarcasm", shouldn't be taken literally and don't reflect my personal opinion.
> the police aren't allowed to connect their equipment to unsecured WiFi networks.
...and VPN technology is way too complicated and expensive, isn't it.
Disclaimer: Above statement(s) is/are an example of "sarcasm", shouldn't be taken literally and don't reflect my personal opinion.
(Didn't downvote you.)
> I'm not sure what I would do if a card was deactivated while traveling.
Just have several cards, from different networks (AMEX, Visa, Mastercard), one is bound to work. That's what I do, especially since some networks are more or less accepted in some countries.
> Don't forget, paying with cash doesn't leave an audit trail with your name on either.
That's why they try to make it disappear all over the world (some countries are further ahead than others), to be replaced by some electronic payment means which governments can trace [1], and ad slingers can use to know precisely what you usually spend your money on [2].
.
[1] To prevent money laundering and tax evasion.
[2] Even if at first they pinky promise they won't sell your information. But of course it won't last, as the Bible (almost) says: "The flesh is willing, but the spirit is weak."
> I guess resistance in this case just means finding and describing the security consequences of this ideas.
Unfortunately for most people security is a bad thing (i.e. something inconvenient, annoying, you need to bypass to "get work done").
I mean people should have heard by now that using "password1" (or the name of their offspring/pet) as a password is a bad idea. And yet. All those people won't mind the somewhat abstract issues you mentioned even if they understood them, they will only hear "AI will assist me" and "AI is cool, all the cool kids use it" (which obviously marketing will keep repeating, with pictures of desirable, young and visibly successful people glowing with barely contained bliss).
> I have avoided anything with AI in it.
Still possible now, but it will become neigh impossible in a couple years as the old, "dumb" appliances reach their planned obsolescence and there are only AI-powered ones to be had.
Of course you can stop using any technical device and go live with the Amish, but are you willing to do so?
> My limited imagination is unable to grasp how that would work.
The bad guys showed some .txt file saying "the data has been shredded as promised".
It might sound a little skimpy, but if you can't trust criminals to be honest, who can you trust...
> If I switch GPS on on my phone it doesn't mean the towers I'm connected to get that information.
The problem isn't the towers, it's the "ad profile" feeding mechanism: To quote the article: "the Pentagon’s MDM disables the serving of personal ads to users, but doesn’t stop the transmission of device advertising IDs or other associated data".
So yes, if you switch on your GPS, the phone knows exactly where you are, and your ad profile gets updated. Subsequently said ad profile gets sold to whoever wants to pay for it, and they'll know very precisely where you have been at that time.
> Why doesn't that apply to these companies?
Too big, too well-connected: They will whistle and Trump will start threatening to attack Europe...
Seriously now, it's the old problem of fighting fair against somebody who fights dirty: It's long, tedious and inefficient, but on the other hand if you start fighting dirty too you've lost: Law has to follow the rules of law, while criminals and powerful/rich entities can (quite literally) afford to ignore the rules which don't suit them.
> quality-of-life improvements for users brave enough to install it
This is assuming everything goes according to plan and your computer doesn't catch fire. Which, Microsoft being Microsoft, is quite a leap of faith, especially concerning updates. For the others, it's quality-of-life deterioration.
My own infestation of Windows 11 has decided that while it detects the TPM 2.0 chip on my 2022 laptop, sorry, PCR7 binding is not possible, so no Win11 24H1 update for me...
Any halfway serious mail server will have a safeguard which stops auto-replying after receiving a number of bounce-back replies, I know mine has. Else any exchange between two accounts with an auto-reply ("Currently on vacation, back the XX of month") would instantly turn into a DoS for both sides...
> I think the microwave oven was posing as a CRT display,
That's indeed the only possible conclusion, but a standard microwave oven doesn't look anywhere like any of the CRT displays I've seen in the last 40 years at work (and I've seen several).
If only the facade (covered by the screenshot) was visible, you could as well disguise it as a filing cabinet or, even simpler, put a couple ring binders in front of it. *shrug*
Oh well.
Definitely hard to understand what happened. How did a screenshot solve the problem?
I got that they tried to conceal a microwave oven, but I've never seen a monitor shaped like a microwave oven, even back in cathode ray tube times. So what did they disguise the microwave oven as? Was the screenshot for?
El Reg, this is not elegant... Why is the quotes' typeface so much bigger than the text's? Traditionally bigger fonts are used for headlines. Italics would be enough to make quotes stick out, a mix of typeface sizes inside the body of the article breaks visual homogeneity and looks simply bad... IMHO at least.
/rant