Why Claude, and not Ernie?
Seems a bit shortsighted to attack the other side with their own weapon. Makes discovery so much easier.
Wait a minute....
779 publicly visible posts • joined 13 Sep 2017
Looking at external 2nd screen for a laptop. Too much $$.
Then I pulled a disused Lenovo 10 inch tablet well past the last software update out of a drawer and found a software package that extended the Windows screen to the tablet.
Bonus! No extra expense!
Landfill denied another prize!
"as you have already backed up your Windows settings, you are eligible for free ESU until Oct 2026". After pressing the enroll button on "updates" page.
Bit of a surprise but OK. I had thought I needed to "chat with the AI" to qualify. Turns out I just needed to backup a few files to OneDrive, using the official tool.
There's a new investment strategy called #buythebreach.
When a company stock price dips due to a cyber event, buy in at the low price and await the recovery.
Example: Tata Motors is down by 41%.
Example: Crowdstrike dropped 50% last July after their software broke many companies' IT. It's now up more than 100% from that low.
(No I don't participate.)
When I complained about the lack of technical strategy and governance over the Rust integration issues I was seriously downvoted.
Yet here we are again with more fractures appearing in the structure.
The "toxic behaviors" can clearly be remedied. Linus is example number 1.
The internal interfaces to for device drivers and file systems can be clearly defined and changes approved in a phased way taking different stakeholders into account.
Other unmanageable people can be layered to minimize their blast radius.
Actual evidence for kernel correctness and/or bugs in the form of fullon testing, by independent testers could be adopted.
Feature management could be added to help support legacy hardware while maintaining compatibility.
In short, governance of the features and processes (and people) comprising the kernel and its development.
Yeah. I already hear the complaints. "Too much corporate style overhead."
And the alternative, for a sustainable and improving and growing kernel is what? More of the same?
Just how long will that last?
Sound corporate governance practices also ensure alignment with stockholder interests by promoting fairness, transparency, and accountability in business activities among employees, management, and the Board of Directors.
From the Illumina Governance web page.
They clearly omitted customers from the list of stakeholders.
There is a publication from IAEA called "IAEA World Fusion Outlook 2024".
It lists all the public and private organizations experimenting with plasmas and trying to build power plants. There is even one company promising power by 2028.
(I was hoping it would list all the possible reactions under consideration but it doesn't. There is one but it's like $100 or something.)
It's a fascinating read. Most of the commercial information is marketing bumpf, but you can see a lot of scientific bumpf in the national descriptions too.
I would say there are a lot of organizations and a lot of billions of dollars going into this so-called "fake" technology. I suspect it may actually be real.
A downvote from me.
Counterexample: think of all those unemployed S360\Assembler programmers. They're driving taxis now, aren't they? /s
Your complaint (you're not alone, there's hundreds of similar complaints everywhere) is based on at least one assumption: you believe that the appetite of the employer for new/modified code is constant. With "n" developers they get X-amount of code per month. AI lets them get X for cheaper, perhaps far cheaper(*).
But, truly (*), code now costs 1/10 as much. Don't they see that as an advantage, even a market-beating one? The employers can now get 10x the code for the same price and swamp the competition with features, quality and performance in their software or web sites without changing their costs much. Isn't that an advantage?
(*) The 10x AI coding gain is, granted, suspicious and there's varied evidence supporting it. However, even without AI there was always a 10:1 ratio between the gifted and grafted programmers. AI just amplifies this a little.
Former $WORK had a contract with ESA and communication was by VAX email over DECnet over X.25.
$WORK had an office in Switzerland, because timezones, and ESA were always amazed we could get one-day turnaround on document updates. The Magic was simple: emailing documents and comments from the Swiss office back to Canada where the timezones mismatched sufficiently that work was done essentially "overnight".
But. Our Swiss office could not interact with ESA and our head-office at the same time; there was no equivalent to a "jump box" or "gateway" in X.25. They had to manually switch the X.25 DECnet link between connecting to home office or connecting to ESA. Which was OK most of the time, except when it they left both links on at the same time. Both DECnets would be trying to route packets to multiple duplicate addresses. Ooops!
I had the occasion to make a warranty claim on my laptop with Lenovo. The cooling fans were sounding like something between Clarkson's fart and an F16 on takeoff.
Only a video would adequately demonstrate the sound. I included a quick shot of the serial number just to validate my claim.
Can't make a text description of that. Or can you?
The Cerebras service (free for casual use but with only a couple of models available) is very, very fast. Especially compared to commercial Nvidia-equipped CPU+GPU services.
I compare it to a video terminal versus a punch-card deck. With a fast response you can re-compose or revise your prompt quickly. With a punch-card deck you lose your train of thought, and you've probably wandered off to do something else.
If the same or similar LLMs are available on comparable platforms, then speed wins every time. If mixture-of-experts and chain-of-thought models get popular, speed is even more important.
What Linux needs is not a new language but better governance. Or psychological help. Or both.
The fact that Linus (or other leadership, a word I use in a very loose sense), does not have a longer-term migration/adoption plan for alternative technologies like Rust, or the means to communicate a firm "no" when people start pushing for one, are two of the many big issues Linux faces.
Some very big corporations rely on the continued success of the kernel developers to deliver working code. I'm very surprised they haven't gotten their mitts on the kernel leadership for a little meeting. We call it a "Come to Jesus" meeting in my part of the world.
Tick tock.
After reading the article, and the linked press release, I still don't get it.
The Pensando chip is embedded, sorry, "melted into" the switch and that makes it "AI-native". Huh.
But what is at the other end of the switch port? Another Pensando-based DPU? Is this just another way to sell more expensive, er, "data centre fabric"? Two for the price of three?