Re: Once upon a time.......
Really, it's to the customer's benefit. No easier to steal, no harder to recover, but if you *do* get it back, the window won't need replacing!
642 publicly visible posts • joined 7 Jul 2017
And no way to link a given bit of training data to the output.
Even if you were to ask it to mimic the style of, say, Stephen King - it's model of "Stephen King style" is built on every King-authored work it has, *and* every work tagged up as imitating him (including the ones that are tagged that way in error). It's got no way to say "this bit of my training is from StephenKingFan1997, this bit is from that AO3 fad where people rewrote Lord of the Rings in other styles, and this bit is from The Dark Tower".
note - I have no idea if the works of Stephen King or AO3 was used in training ChatGPT - just an example of the function.
We once had a UPS fire, and it turns out that the smoke from a battery acid fire isn't good for drives, if not reliably fatal.
The more expensive kit in the room got sent to professional cleaners and was fine, but we had ~45 Pentium 4s in the room (old then, but working).
When I powered them up, most of them were fine, but one started taking multiple attempts to boot, and a two others just refused to start any more.
As a note, the smoke from a battery acid fire, even after it's out and had a day or two to vent, isn't great for your lungs either. I had a nasty cough for weeks...
There are two options, really
1) run. Run away quickly. Assuming you don't accidentally get a job somewhere with worse problems, it helps you *and* sends a message to the bean counters that there are costs beyond the old team's salary.
2) befriend the new guys and help them learn as much as you can. I can't promise it'll work, but in my experience it certainly seemed to make a difference to the underpaid, undersupported outsourced team to have *some* friendly faces who don't rage when things break, and respond well to clarifying questions about issues.
It's an interesting hypothetical, but I've been using NoScript for years, and they haven't been doing that.
I assume there's a technical reason why, but most of the time web scripts don't spin up random domains (and almost never work by IP address). They might use a CDN or two, but even thought they could do so easily, it's rare to find a major player putting their code anywhere novel.
I think we can worry about that when it starts happening.
I doubt it, though I'm not an expert.
Venus is almost earth-sized, and the rocks in question are smaller than the dinosaur-killer, which didn't throw off that much of our atmosphere (some, yes, and there's probably bits of dinosaur-era rock that ended up on the moon, but not enough to massively change atmospheric density).
They have to have more to gain breaking it than staying in, mind! They can be very stable if everyone prefers a comfy life of profit to a gamble on winning a price war and everyone else is making profits too, so... what if they've saved a bigger warchest? It's a massive gamble.
There's a reason it's common to offer amnesty to the first member of a cartel to dob the rest in to the feds. Evey cartel knows that whichever one of them breaks first gets to keep the profits and screw everyone else. _That_ is a recipe for instability.
"Quiet Quitting" is more about "If I am paid to work one full time job, why would I work unpaid overtime?".
It's about working to your contract, and nothing past that. If you're in a company/industry that's not been doing pay rises for a while, there's really no incentive to go the proverbial extra mile, so some folks just don't do things they're not paid for.
Well, mostly it's illegal to install phone jammers in most of the US (where this happened), for a bunch of reasons.
Radio waves don't respect walls, and can go quite a way vertically - even if you don't have immediate neighbours, you'd have dark-zone cones over the place that messes with phones and some instruments in aircraft.
The whitelisted approach towers still needs to deal with other cell towers in range - remember you need to block inmates, but not your neighbours, passing motorists, etc. There will be "normal" cells in range of most prisons (you can tell, they have phone coverage).
The faraday cage thing might be more practical, but it may be an expensive retrofit. Probably cheaper over-all to randomly search the cells, since you're going to be doing that anyway for other contraband.
(obviously we'd have the same problems over here, but possibly worse given how often our prisons are inside major cities. If there was a jammer running in Cardiff prison, it'd be jamming the local magistrates court, as well as most of the town centre...)
Presumably they knew that the guinea-pig store had been given the update.
I'm guessing the red flags were mostly "this entire store dropped off the system" and second-order impacts from that (batches failing instead of skipping the store, maybe).
The might get into the realm of Clever Schemes, and those are, generally speaking, things that courts have seen hundreds and hundreds of times over the years, and will recognise. If Musk has competent lawyers, they'll be strongly warning against doing anything like that.
Reality is that people try to get out of this sort of thing all the time, the only exceptional thing here is the number of zeros on the cheques. Musk and his lawyers will have to work really, really hard to come up with a novel form of bullshit the courts won't have a standardised response to already.
A lot of expensive art is purely for the boast, like watches. A £35k Rolex is a very, very good watch, sure, but it's primary purpose is telling other people you can afford a £35k Rolex.
Obviously there's also speculative investments ("will this art resell later for more?") and speculative investment frauds.
This artist is a rising star! They sold a painting for 100k! And by that I mean the agent sold it to his holding company for 100k, so there's a 100k sale in the record...
In my experience, cats usually have a "language" - or at least a phrase book - of meows that mean things. Usually this builds up over time as they connect noises they made and results achieved - smarter ones can be taught to use a soundboard.
The problem is that cats are not a hive mind, nor web-connected. There's no universal Cat Language, just noises each individual cat has come to associate with being fed, petted or whatever. One cat's "pick me up" meow might be the same as another's "dinner is 23 seconds late.
For a few years, half my job was re-writing stuff made by consultants who weren't exactly beyond contact, but that management had a strong policy to never contact again.
On the one hand, it is always easier to rebuild than design from scratch, but on the other hand - you should not build seventeen nearly-identical modules for handling client surnames (based on which broker submitted the business).
Found that one out when one broker file would not go through, because while it was fine disambiguation "Mr & Mrs Smith" it choked on "Mrs & Mr Smith".
I got a scambot call yesterday, claiming to be "calling back about the issue you raised to the housing officer".
Naturally, I elaborated on the vast amount of cheese that had piled up against the south wall. I'm reasonably sure it huge up in about the same time a human scammer would have done.
The worst I've run into, untangling accounts for a pensions company, was a married couple that shared an address (naturally), birthday and year (married couples are often about the same age, this is about a 1-in-2000 couples thing), shared a surname (pretty common for married folks) and... the same first name (Alex) and initials.
Made sure to put a note on that saying to triple-check the full name if either ever wrote in for one of the big D's (Divorce, Death, or Default), to avoid sending anything really insensitive out.
I used to work with actuaries. Like, seriously smart folks - every last one had a 2.1 or better degree before they even started the actuarial studies. Their job was entirely problem solving and math-wrangling on short deadlines.
Yes, they made some *ridiculous* mistakes - I more than once "fixed the macros" by clicking the bright yellow 'Enable Macros' button. But... everyone has off days. Anyone can overlook stuff, especially when in a really stressful environment.
The audit business model depends on having one solution they can apply to every customer they have.
If someone says "we need you to switch to..." they'll lose money trying, so will just prefer you go find another auditor, if they can't persuade you to stay with their platform. Really not flexible at all, and an absolute pain to run into.
The number of times I've seen "if we do _this_ we get the same/better service for less money" become "we get an utterly inadequate service for much less money, and the PM gets a bonus for saving the company money"...
Worst was the time they nickle-and-dimed down a cloud storage solution to the point we didn't have any backup/rollback service at all. We ended up having to go back entirely to on-premise storage because it turns out we were legally required to have said backups. I still don't entirely understand how that went so badly.
In theory, it's to recognise that you can't make your stuff greener than it is, so instead you find someone who's significantly greener and give them money so you can take credit for their savings.
It's a way to incentivise being greener even when you're in an industry no-one pays attention to, or even promote new businesses to setup specifically to run carbon-sinks or whatever.
In theory. I've no idea how well it's running in practice.
It's more likely to do with risk.
A new hire doesn't have drive access? Well, sucks, but they can do the orientation slides or something. Forget to pay them? Manual payment can cover that without anyone being harmed, using the same processes that you run to do all your expenses.
Someone leaves and still has access to confidential documents? That's much more worrying. And accidentally paying them too much, well, you can get the money back, but recovery isn't free - god forbid they go out of contact or otherwise force you to go to legal action, and you have to pay court fees and lawyer's rates...
I remember when I was a student in shared accommodation (in fairness, that was a while back now), and having to change the name on the bills when someone moved out was often *astonishingly* painful, despite it being a thing that happens all the damn time. You'd think changing between family members would be common too!
The one exception was SWALEC, where the guy taking the call actually lived around the corner from us. Absolutely flawless service, took minutes to do.
(at the far end of the range, I once struggled to explain to Virgin Media that "Mr The Occupier" wasn't a real person)
A friend of mine made a living for a few years as a consultant, going to companies and unlocking their excel worksheets for them. Aside from that particular trick, depending on the Office version you might be able to find/overwrite the password in the file with a hex editor, or up until Office 2010 you could just have a macro guess the password.
Their hashing was not great, so you'd get collisions all over the place, usually you'd find a 6-character string that would be accepted.
A lot of companies have critical stuff sat locked that was build by someone who's left the company. It works, but until they need to change it they just don't really realise how much trouble it is. and provided they actually own the file, it is legal to crack the password, and software can be found to do so.
Myself? I need a very good reason to put a password on stuff. I don't often deal with critical customer data, and the main use for protected worksheets is "stop me accidentally breaking something", so why set a password?
So, not that long ago, I found a bug in the office 2010 VBA editor. It wasn't quite as bad as a hard-cap on lines, but, in essence - too much code could crash it.
I was working with this horrifically complex macro - basically an entire application that happened to use Excel as a GUI. Periodically the users would ask for new functionality, and I'd be tasked with updating it (I assume in a past life I was a terrible sinner). VBA isn't hard to work with really, and this monster had a built-in error-stack, good naming conventions, lots of comments, pretty much the ideal for a gigantic excel macro, if such a thing has to exist! And it was oh so functionalised, no repeated code, lots of tiny sub-functions being called whenever that would have happened.
For some reason, it crashed a lot, but only when being tested with the VBA editor open.
t
If I closed the VBE window and just clicked GUI buttons, it worked fine! But I couldn't so much as run a test function with the VBE open, lest it hard-crash to desktop. After a few times of re-typing the same changes, the first thing I did was make sure it saved itself before doing any tests, in case I forgot, and then I went digging in the (online) manuals.
Turns out that because VBA has access to the entire Office object model, that includes _the VBA editor itself_.
So now the code checks to see if it's being run with the VBE open, and if so, it closes the VBE window to re-open either at the end of the process or if the error handler is invoked.
Amazing the lengths we can go to to avoid re-implementing decade-old excel macros in a better behaved language, eh? Still it pays my bills...
So often, it's the overly-complex hiding the tracks that gets people caught.
There was a manager at a big insurer (er, let's call them Celtic Bereaved) back in the 90s who was just writing himself cheques from the company, and approving them. Due to the volume of cheques moving around and the trusted (at the time) position he was in, this wasn't caught, and the final investigation confirmed that if he'd just kept doing that he'd never have been caught! If nothing else, these payments were so regular that anyone who might process them would just see them as "another one of those" - completely routine, and not suspicious.
What got him caught was he started moving money around between other accounts to 'disguise' the payments, and one day one of these cover payments attracted a desk jockey's attention as being a bit odd, asked a few questions and before you knew it, manager's in handcuffs and the board are setting up a team specifically to audit managers who have the authority to both raise and approve payments.