Abusing backdoors?
Naughty people
3270 publicly visible posts • joined 9 Jun 2017
In one hand, it isn't that great for a cybersecurity company to be hacked.
In the other hand, there are two types of companies, the ones which were hacked and the ones which didn't know they were hacked.
Having more details on the attack and having tips on how to counter it would be useful. Being open and transparent is IMNSHO the best way to go in that case.
Put a free cafe machine in the office, the best way to make co-workers socialize.
Having to deal almost everyday with Teams and Webex, I prefer the latter: much more enduring, no lag, no audio cut whatever the number of participants, not like the former.
The shiny new devices marketing loves? Hmmm... I will let the marketing play with it, I don't need more crap on my desk, thank you.
I get plenty of emails from sites which don't verify email addresses before sending mails. Generally it's from US websites dealing with US customers: I guess they don't mind abusing people.
When this is about membership, I generally ask a password reset, connect, and change the mail settings to "imtoostupidtoknownmyown@email.address". And then I'm not spammed by this site again.
RIP Mr. Yeager.
Chuck Yeager's Air Combat was one of my favourite games during the 90s
An HMS vessel may have motors to keep its position. We're not talking here about a airship but a hot air balloon: moving following X and Y-axis is possible only by catching the appropriate wind pushing in the right direction. And to do so the only way is to intervene on the Z-axis.
You make the confusion between a whole nation and the rogue actions of some of its soldiers.
Because Australia dealt openly with those actions, it cannot be considered accomplice of those killings.
Something that cannot be said for example for China regarding the Tiananmen Square Massacre for instance.
IMNSHO, Australian politicos' answer is not the good one. It only gives more weight to China's trolling, and everybody should know it: never feed the troll.
Summon Chinese ambassador to scold would have been the good diplomatic option.
Everybody not brainwashed with Xi's propaganda knows that China has no lesson to give: Xinjiang "re-education" camps, Laogai, systematic crackdown on dissent is China's reality.
China is becoming more and more aggressive. Democracies have to stand with Australia.
In other words, the desire to prevent the other side from achieving anything has already overtaken every other consideration.
When respecting election results and voters wishes is not a priority but keeping power at any cost is, then one can consider that people involved in these efforts don't give a fuck about democracy and can be considered as enemies of it.
The logic would say that if you do business here, you pay tax here like anybody else, like any SME for instance. Closing the loopholes enabling multinational companies to do creative accounting could be more efficient than a dedicated tax, but it seems that the 'lobbying' (in other words 'corruption') made by these companies towards lawmakers forbids that option. It enables those megacorps to practice unfair competition to the detriment of small businesses, and their bosses to get richer and richer every year.
What I don't get about this rule is that this study shows that restaurants are COVID hotspots, and the longer you stay in, the riskier it is. So what's the point to make people eat in pubs?
Following a safety logic, as long as vaccines are not massively available, restaurants and bars should stay closed.
In public or private sectors, technocrats are very, very good at creating stupid rules. COVID is a blessing for them, they can show how creative they can be.
If something doesn't change through times, it's bureaucracy. I expect it to be still in place in 2200 - if there are still humans, that is.
As you will no doubt be aware, the plans for development of the outlying regions of the Galaxy require the building of a hyperspatial express route through your star system, and regrettably, your planet is one of those scheduled for demolition. The process will take slightly less than two of your Earth minutes. Thank you.
That's why governments don't trust the cloudy office stuff, for example (I know from sources that there is a lot of concern about the first point).
As soon as your data are outside of the EU, they are not safe.
Problem is, we don't even know if data stored in EU datacenters are not backed up/ extracted to other locations. What secret agreements exist between GAFA and the NSA or one of the other 16 US 'intelligence' agencies? Snowden showed us the US cannot be trusted.
"that allow people to feel good about the batteries they haul around while still polluting and costing a fortune to maintain.". Because you think that building and recycling batteries is non pollutant? And neither is electricity production?
I agree cars using fossil fuels have to disappear, but battery-powered EV are not the solution for everybody, just for urban people who don't need to travel.
In democracies, when someone gets more votes than his/her opponent, he/she's elected. I know it doesn't happen each time in the US, but nobody who is serious considers the US as a model of democracy. I understand you are disappointed that your rigged system of yours didn't ensure once again the (far-) rightwinged candidate to win despite losing the popular vote, and this despite the many efforts of the GOP to suppress voters, but it's time for you for a reality check.
Electric cars are not a solution per se for CO2 reduction if electricity is made from coal or gas.
There's also the problem of the grid, that may not sustain such an increase in use. Making and recycling batteries cleanly aren't easy challenges too.
The solution is Hydrogen. We know it works: Toyota, Honda, Hyundai have all commercial vehicles already available. Two weak points: industrializing the way to produce 'clean' hydrogen, and developing the filling stations everywhere. But it's definitively the best solution.
how Apple can justify taking a 30% cut of App Store purchases when said store hasn't changed much in years and so ongoing development costs would be either very low or close to zero
Value is not related to cost. Benefit is the link between value and cost. You cannot claim the value is low because the cost is, nor the opposite.
AFAIK, the Moon is closer to Mars environment than the Earth is. For instance, Earth is protected from solar and space radiations, Moon is not, Mars just a few. Earth conditions make cooling easy, it's much more difficult on the Moon with no atmosphere or on Mars with its very tiny one. If something works on the Moon, it will work on Mars.
If the final goal is to colonize Mars, let's start with the Moon. Experiment rovers able to build shelters, or to dig and extract water, let's be more innovative! It's just a 3 days trip, not a 9 months every other year.
It needed 7 international coalitions to bring him down, and his last major defeat was when he was greatly outnumbered. May Grouchy have come instead of Blücher...
69 victories, 8 defeats, 2 draws, few generals can claim such a record, knowing that many of his victories were the direct consequences of his orders, like during the Siege of Toulon, Austerlitz or Friedland. Strategically he made many mistakes, but tactically he was a real genius.