When cops twist the rules to fit their will, abuses are on the way.
== Bring us Dabbsy back! ==
3270 publicly visible posts • joined 9 Jun 2017
Far right extremism get a lot of protection when it is a real danger and kill people in many countries.
Far right is responsible for massacres on many continents. Pinochet, Franco, Tōjō, Papadópoulos, Videla, Stroessner, Pétain, Montt and others have killed scores of people. But some still believe that allowing the people supporting their actions and propagating their ideas should be protected. That's nonsense. Al qaeda's free speech is not protected, far right extremists shouldn't be protected either.
== Bring us Dabbsy back! ==
"The explosive growth and high returns of the DeFi ecosystem have lured many early adopters to embrace blockchain technologies, such as smart contracts," Oglesby told The Register. "However, early investors should be wary. Most DeFi systems have little protection or safety nets in place to prevent catastrophic loss from a fraudulent attack."
But we were told that blockchain was the future and the solution to everything. .
I wonder if Gartner isn't in fact an NK proxy...
== Bring us Dabbsy back! ==
This article would be interesting and understandable by most if it didn't mention those medieval units used everywhere except in most countries
== Bring us Dabbsy back ==
It's a good idea. Throwing satellites away because their tank is empty is a waste and there's enough junk in space.
Northrop's Mission Extension Vehicle is an interesting solution too. Maybe would it be also possible to add a "plugin" to existing satellites to extend their lives?
Anyway, it goes in the right direction.
== Bring us Dabbsy back! ==
Javascript is a programming language? I thought it was a big pile of crap.
BTW, HTML is not a programming language. Even if it's awesome.
It isn't limited to UK only:
Drought-stricken Holland discovers Microsoft data center slurped 84m liters of drinking water last year
[...]
Microsoft, and the municipality of Hollands-Kroon, had previously said the Middenmeer facility would only need 12m to 20m liters per year, but local news outlet Noordhollands Dagblad uncovered classified figures which revealed the site, where Microsoft runs multiple data centers, used 84 million liters
Megatechcorps would lie? Unbelievable, isn't it?
As stated in the article, "Since 2000, production losses due to high river temperatures and low river flows have represented an average of 0.3% of annual production.". It's peanuts and doesn't explain the shortage.
The main reason is the maintenance of older power stations. 27 reactors are stopped on the 56 in France for a planned maintenance. In that context, closing a nuclear power station two years ago was not a good idea. The main reason stays it's the lack of investments to build new reactors to replace the older ones which causes today's shortages. This requires a long-term view that politicians haven't, as they look only to the next election.
Add also that because of the blindness of our deciders for the last 30 years and the negative influence of pseudo-greens against nuclear energy, no major investment were made to build new nuclear reactors. The old ones need more and more maintenance and must be shut down.
Closing Fessenheim was a mistake for instance and we'll collectively pay the price soon.
It's because of an European rule made to favour producers over local consumers interests.
cf https://www.politico.eu/article/why-europes-electricity-is-so-expensive/
"The markets follow a marginal model, which means the final price of electricity for the following day is pegged to the price of the most expensive fuel required to meet projected demand. The system is designed to provide utilities with the opportunity to recover investments and operating expenses.
If 100 percent of demand can be met with wind, solar and nuclear, which have very low generation costs, the price of power can be very low or even negative — this happened during the spring of 2020, when electricity demand was low and renewable energy production was high.
But when the expected demand exceeds the supply capable of being generated by clean power, costly fossil fuels have to be used to meet demand, and the price of power is pegged to that value. That's why the spike in natural gas costs is bad news for power prices."
Many ask the EU Commission to change that for months. It would help consumers in countries where electricity isn't produced by fossil fuels, as in France, but not the others that may in the end pay higher prices. It's the argument used by the Commission to refuse to change that rule. Because of the pressure of citizens, I think that in the coming months France could decide unilaterally not to follow the EU rules, at a cost of a European crisis.
WIth a rocker, it would be much harder to ask us to pay a monthly subscription to be able to turn on or off the bulbs in our house. They call that "the progress".
Add to this it would be harder for miscreants to turn your lightbulb in a zombie to attack other devices...
In the future, our whole could be ransomwared. You don't pay, you can't enter it, neither warm it nor light it. What a dream.
Yes, but the reason we got the excess CO2 in the first place was that we borrowed...
As you say, we haven't that energy source, and even if, it won't be used in a near future. CO2 production will rise in the next years whatever Europe does, so the only solution in a new future is to remove the CO2 from the atmosphere.
I don't understand the question
You're right, I didn't read carefully enough and didn't see CO was produced, something that isn't good enough as CO is toxic to us.
I thought New Horizon was faster than Voyager, but I was wrong
Slowing a probe down enough to prevent the balloon from being torn to shreds is rather tricky but not impossible.
Wasn't that achieved by the Vega missions?
Let those ministers do their claims. It's all about bragging and speaking out loud.
EU has enough problems and doesn't need to spill money in a country who decided to leave the Union and who unilaterally change the terms of the agreement between the two. UK cannot be trusted as long as its leadership will say the same. If the UK citizens want to keep it, no problem, it's democracy. But there's no need to the EU to bend and comply to the wills of such jerks.