Re: Hardware failures
You are <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pauli_effect/“></a> and I claim my £5
1275 publicly visible posts • joined 8 Jun 2017
“it was the target of a sophisticated social engineering campaign” affecting a “limited portion of RingCentral customers.”
It’s always a ‘sophisticated attack/campaign isn’t it, it’s never ‘well it was a script-kiddy but we had piss-poor defences and staff training’!
And a ‘limited portion’ that could be ‘it was limited to 100% of our customers - so that’s all right then, yes?'
It depends on your definition of a ‘strong password’. The classic Correct Horse Battery Staple is a far better password than efhiuoh^$%£, because no fucker will be able to remember the latter and will write it down somewhere. So one and only one password policy, just length, minimum 20 characters - and if they complain say use the first line of your favourite book, etc.*
* yes I know a person’s favourite book could be gleaned from social media posts, and first line/sentence could be inferred, but better than most other methods. Also do not use ‘In the beginning God created the Heaven and the Earth’, because although that may well be someone's favourite book; but it’s a bit obvious. See social media posts. I don’t know what the first line of the Torah or the Quran are, but similar would apply.
Someone worse than Trump, really that’s pushing credibility, but you never know!
But yes, this is not something that can be done quickly, and CEOs of companies do tend to be somewhat conservative and a bit short-termist (well Microsoft have never cut us off in the past, so they never will), good luck getting the approval needed.
I doubt it was to save cost; like it or not, Swift is coming down in the next few months whatever. So a company can cobble together some kind of rescue mission, yes probably corners were cut by necessity. This is really a nothing to lose, everything to gain mission. At best it succeeds, at worse Swift is lost, but it would be lost anyway and valuable engineering data would have been gained.
SpaceX still does some quite impressive stuff, but you are right, using it as a cash-cow for xAI is going to bring it down.
How many of Elon’s enterprises are actually profitable? Starlink, Space X? Whatever happened to the Boring Company? Tesla, once the golden child, now, not looking too healthy!
There is a limit to how much you can ‘work the figures’ and keep investors on board, but eventually the whole lot implodes - and when it does, it won’t be pretty.
But neither mind, he will be bailed out by the US taxpayer as SpaceX has strategic importance, enough for a new yacht for him, less social care for the US ‘little people’.
If SpaceX does implode and is really of US strategic importance, then it’s obvious what to do, nationalise it, Act of Congress, take it into State control without compensation to shareholders; no the company you had shares in has gone bust, sorry, you have lost your money - it’s called Capitalism! But for national security issues, we need to keep it running but as a national asset.
Yes I know, a bit socialist and anathema to the perceived wisdom of many in the US.
I suspect though it’ll be a taxpayer bailout, shovel a few extra billions Elon’s way.
"(Always one hand behind your back, kids, when probing live AC!)”
And also, if possible stand on one leg! The logic being that if you do touch a live contact, the current will ground itself down one leg (assuming that you are standing on the right single leg), rather than passing across your chest and doing unfortunate things to your heart rhythm. Now although I do get the idea, I’m not too convinced that this is helpful in any way.
I have had precisely two belts from mains electrical supply (UK so 230-250V), neither of which were pleasant. In both cases the jolt caused muscles to contact and pulled my hand away, as opposed to gripping the live terminal and not being able to let go - in which case you will not be having a good day. However the first time was many, many decades ago, where I was installing an early touch-sensitive light switch, This involved turning a variable resister with the power on to calibrate it. Although I was using an insulated screwdriver, it was obviously not insulated enough, or somehow I was touching the metal part. When my hand whipped back, I managed, somehow, to stab myself in the face with said screwdriver!
Still do, as does the Orion capsule. They are referred to as ‘tractor’ systems as the solid rockets are above the crew capsule and basically pull it away from the booster. Crew Dragon does it differently, there is no tower but there are a set of Super Draco engines set in the base of the capsule which, if fired push the capsule clear (a ‘pusher’ system. Starliner uses a similar system.
Both the Russian and Chinese crewed craft use tractor-style escape towers. The only time one was used in anger was a Soyuz flight where the booster caught fire just before liftoff; the escape system pulled the capsule clear a few seconds before the booster exploded. Because of the need to get clear of the exploding booster, the acceleration of these things is really quite brutal, albeit only for a few seconds. The Soyuz crew were reported to be badly bruised but at least alive.
It’s less stupid than ignorance, and the latter is not a derogatory term. Yes I have an honours degree in Physics, but I am an incompetent brain surgeon.
They simply don’t know or understand the risks. Hopefully you pointed this out to them, and ideally they took steps. And if not, then yes that is stupid.
In theory, yes you are right a centralised system should be best. But, of course, in theory Communism is the best form of government because everyone is equal, everything is resolved by consensus and everyone looks out for everyone else.
Or not.
A centralised system tends to fossilise, one single system, supplier, model is chosen and has to work for everyone. Except, the outliers, where it doesn’t work. But the knee-jerk reaction is to try to force them to conform to ’the system’ rather than allow ‘dissidents’.
There is no easy or perfect answer or solution.
As I've heard it, it's to flush the crud out of the lines. Often accompanied by warnings not to wash light colored clothes on the days they are doing it.
And you might want to only drink bottled or filtered on those days?
Sorry, sorry, you’ve lost me - just what sort of oddball fresh water supply do you have in your neck of the woods?
"We used Keepass at our org for years, but eventually we had to go with a multi-user solution.
Keepass is excellent though if it fits your use case.”
Which is a very good point - yes FOSS solutions do exist, but not always geared for multiuser access, aimed at a single user, ‘can’ be made to work in a multiuser environment, but only if everyone behaves properly - which they won’t.
"There was also a machine with a “Do Not Turn Off” note posted to it sitting in a corner that everyone was afraid to touch.”
Ah yes the 'mystery machine’ - not uncommon, I tend to slightly pull the network cable out and wait a few days/weeks and see who screams! If challenged, the cable is old and must have come loose, (bonus points for snapping off the latch on the RJ-45 plug) I’ll replace it with a new cable so this doesn’t happen again!
A considerable degree of boffinry involved here, so a virtual pint for everyone involved.
If it works, then excellent, but if not, then at least they tried (and by they, I mean humanity - well the better parts of it anyway). And if it doesn’t, then lessons will have been learnt - yes I know cliched but, I mean it in the literal sense; not the way politicians use it, ie our incompetence has been shown up.
In science and engineering, failures, lessons learnt, mean literally that.
Not sure why on earth this post was downvoted. All previous soft splashdowns ended up being quite explody; no reason to suspect 13 wouldn’t end the same and so why put in place the ability to recover it.
Salt water is really quite corrosive so it probably wouldn’t; be viable to refurbish it for reuse, yes, recovering it to allow full inspection of the heat shield tiles would be useful, but overall it probably just wasn’t;t worth it.