Sadly, this is all par for the course for Telstra.
They have a long and ignoble history of screwing customers, either accidentally or on purpose.
738 publicly visible posts • joined 26 May 2017
All nice words Albo, but I have my serious doubts.
There's a 10 acre data centre a few kilometres from my place. Its massive, not yet finished but a large chunk of it is operational.
People live 10 metres away from it, literally across the street. There's a constant hum from it .. lovely.
I know 10 acres isn't big by global standards but geez.
At Google's I/O 2026 developer conference last week, the company's Search VP Liz Reid celebrated the rapid growth of AI Mode, which Google refers to as its end-to-end AI search experience. External observers refer to it as simply as the end of search.
Well, thanks Google, you've helped fuck the Internet a big way.
F you very much.
Bollocks to that. In my home life? How, exactly? How am I falling behind by ignoring AI?
My home is gloriously free of anything with the stench of "smart" attached to it. I need a light on, I walk over to the wall and press the switch.
Software developers are already complaining that being forced to use AI at work is turning their brains to mush.
We are supposed to control machines, not the other way round.
"The committee said existing age restrictions should be properly enforced using "effective and privacy-preserving" age verification systems...."
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha and ha.
Name one system that effectively does that, just one, and convince absolutely everybody that it will never be compromised.
"They get to increase ad effectiveness, shield themselves from lawsuits, while gaslighting casual news readers into thinking it's really about the kids."
The media barely do ANY analysis now. They just parrot government press releases and move on. It is actually really depressing.
So hopefully all of you in the UK are writing strongly worded emails/letters to your local representatives about this stupidity....yes?
These stupid age verification laws normalise surveillance. They're getting a whole generation used to the idea that they need to turn a camera on when they access content online. It is not OK to have to constantly prove you're an adult every time you want to do something online. I wonder if the politicians can even spell "panopticon".
"Zorin and Mint are not for you or me, they are for "Windows Refugees". People that [b]wanted to keep using Windows[/b] (even Windows 11) but, for whatever reason, are forced to use Linux..."
Forced to use Linux?
Not in my case. I never liked Windows. I'd been wanting to try Linux for quite some time, but without all the futzing around that some distributions seemed to require. Then I discovered Mint .
Download it, install it and you have a solid working system within minutes.
I want to do stuff with my computer, not mess around in the guts of the OS.
Anyone arguing for this nonsense is totally naive. In the politicians' case it's just sheer stupidity/bloody mindedness.
It's all part of the war on personal computing that is being waged these days - encryption back doors, DRM, endless data slurping, the list goes on. As the article states, the proposed law is so nebulous and ill defined, how on earth is it going to be enforced?
Those who would argue that it's just a minor quibble miss the larger point. It's called scope creep. If by some miracle this sort of thing becomes a requirement, you can bet your bottom dollar it will be expanded over time into something truly odious.
We don't need government permission to use our own computing devices as we see fit, free of spying and verifying every damn time we want to do something.
That should be the starting point for combatting garbage like this.