Re: Odd
And miss the chance to make them speak to sales again? After all, the license key needing to be reentered is the perfect time to consider if you want to spend more money upgrade to a higher service plan!
399 publicly visible posts • joined 29 Apr 2017
The question is how you stop ISPs from immediately abusing the privilege to do any sort of prioritizing. Sure, it benefits everybody if media streams are treated as high priority while simple page loads are last in line, but greasing the right palms could see your page loads above a less cooperative source's streams. Even if you just allow prioritization based on category, there'll be plenty of gaming the terminology to make things as "advantageous" for the ISPs as possible.
It's true Social Security numbers were never meant to be private, but having one now means you can access pretty much anything about the owner's life and the ability to attach their name to nearly anything you please. With absolutely no authorization mechanism in place, the only thing to do is to keep the SSN secret.
Google's been caught having Chromium installations install closed-source modules without telling anyone. As long as the browser is maintained by them, you can all but guarantee they'll use it against you.
There's probably something in the ToS that say you can't sue them - and even if there wasn't, lawsuits are a huge hassle that most people wouldn't want to bother if they didn't have to(hiring a lawyer, taking days off to appear in court, etc). It's possible for a class-action lawsuit to happen, but we all know how that would turn out.
The problem with the analogy is that Google used a number of avenues to promote Chrome that alternatives just don't have - avenues such as getting companies offering free downloads to bundle it with their software, advertising it on one of the most trafficked web pages in the world, etc. It also got a massive, lightning-in-a-bottle boost when other large sites pushed it hard due to the newly-appointed Mozilla CEO having donated to a PAC in favor of traditional marriage years before he took the helm.
As it stands, almost all the competitors have nothing but word-of-mouth to spread by - and most of those are still Chromium skins. The few exceptions are Firefox forks, but their userbase tends to be disgruntled Firefox users; converting Chrome users isn't typical. We might see this monoculture broken, but HTML5 has allowed it to embed itself much deeper than IE6 did.
I'd say the copyright period could be a bit longer(40 years sounds about right), but it definitely needs to be fixed. None of this "life of the author" nonsense - as it is, somebody who published young and lived long enough could have his copyrights last multiple centuries.
Frankly, we just need to tear copyright down and rebuild it from first principles.
Sometimes that's literally the only way: Uncle Sam was caught buying replacement parts for the VAX machines controlling the nuclear arsenal on eBay because they'd run out of spares and the production line had been closed for some time(they've since replaced the physical minicomputers with emulators).
Maybe not "polar bears in the snow", but setting up a camera that can give you a good look at all skintones at once can be kind of difficult.
> I also see very bad security level at Apple secret facility - guy was able to copy from network (!) to his personal storage (!). Why do they permit storing secret files on personal computers? Apple network does not work?
Very much this: why are people permitted to keep any data on personal devices if it's supposed to be this top secret? If they need people to be able to work on it outside the office, it's trivial to setup a connection that doesn't let the data leave the server.
This is wrong. Many (most?) states allow cities and counties to stack on some amount of tax, making the actual tax rate far more variable(for example, total tax in California varies between 7.25% and 10.25%). That said, I'm pretty sure there's more to the difference between US sales tax and European VAT than being a separate line item vs. being incorporated into the list price.
> "Indigenous people" is a better term for them as a whole, but I much prefer to call them by the name they give themselves.
"Indigenous people" is far broader, anyway: it simply refers to the first people to inhabit any given area. It can be easy to ignore, though, since most of the world has either had the indigenous people of the area completely eradicated or still dominant.
"(American) Indian", on the other hand, is pretty specific in that it refers to the indigenous peoples of the current contiguous United States.
They haven't just refused to commit to a stable API - they actively change it just to screw over any attempt to create a compatibility layer. If this were a company, they'd be under the magnifying glass for anticompetitive behavior; unfortunately, even Red Hat's control over the Linux landscape is unlikely to draw the attention of even the most ornery of regulators.
> "Although I am an American, and am not affected by this change, I do not agree with your assessment; I fully agree with the EU's policy on this."
All he's saying is that existing domains should be grandfathered in, which is standard with just about everything. That Brussels has demanded all domains be confiscated is very much contrary to the norm - and a petty departure at that.
The reason for Bitcoin's high transaction isn't the cost of mining, but that only so many transactions can be processed on the same block; with enough people wanting on the blockchain, miners can tell anyone not willing to stump up huge fees to get bent(if they couldn't, the energy spent mining would fall to match demand). This could be resolved by using a larger block size or more frequent block processing, but the latter would completely break the protocol and the Bitcoin developers absolutely refuse to do the former.
> From what I can see it is *far* too likely that he'll be re-elected in 2020.
Assuming he doesn't buckle on the wall. With that GoFundMe having nearly reached $20 million, it's almost certain that letting the Democrats get their way would alienate his supporters to the point of no return.
Assuming it's not just the age of the data, the lack of AfD information in the dump suggests to me a frame job, which would make it more likely someone with anti-Russian sentiments; a professional, state op would be better conducted than to leave such a glaring omission(unless this is a Russian frame job made to look like a frame job against them - but at that point of speculation we're just tumbling down rabbit holes).
They're both very much correct: we do need to expand off the planet, but Mars is still stupid. It has no magnetic shield and an unbreathably thin atmosphere; it'd face all the problems of a moon colony, but be months or even years away from resupply and in a deeper gravity well. There's no reason to settle there except overeager romanticism.
In the sixties, there was a psychopolitical need to beat the Soviet, magnified by Kennedy's assassination. There's no such push today; NASA might get some funding if they can ever manage to fling an Orion around the moon(potentially capturing the public imagination), but at the rate SLS is going, that's a big if.
Internet Explorer is in Windows for legacy compatibility(many corporate web apps depend on the peculiarities of one version or another). Edge was created because there was pretty much no room to implement modern web features without breaking something; it's nothing more than a nice-to-have, so it can be dropped without issue.
They offer a deluxe Steam version of Shadow of the Tomb Raider on their silver store for 98000 Razer silver. Assuming 500 silver a day is the average cut like they say it is, that comes out to 196 days to get it. Now, if we assume that getting that 500 requires leaving on a 500W graphics card on for 24 hours(they don't give any numbers there), that's a total of 2352 kilowatt hours. Combine this with the average US cost of residential electricity(13.01¢ per kilowatt hour), that comes out to $306 as opposed to Steam's current price of $70 for the game. If we're more generous and say it only takes 6 hours to get that silver with our hypothetical GPU, we can get it down to $76.50, but that's still a losing proposition.
> Yeah, this is how low my opinion of them has sunk.
"They 'trust me'. Dumb fucks." Really, that comment says everything you need to know about Facebook and privacy. The only reasons they care about data leaks are the risk of fines and the money foregone when it gets out of their clutches. You shouldn't have let your opinion of them get as high as you did.
The existence of alternate DNS roots just creates its own set of problems. This is, in my opinion, one of those rare cases where a blockchain just might make sense: nobody has to trust anybody but can still find everybody. This also has some more obvious problems, but decentralization in some form is going to be the only way to put an end to this.
The basic of a block chain is this: you have a start block containing some information(usually of a fixed size); you then add a second block, which includes the hash of the first block's data. A third block gets added, again with the hash of the second block's data(which includes the hash of the first block), and so on and so forth. This means that the value of any block is dependent on the value of the entire chain before it, so it's theoretically impossible to pull a fast one without rewriting the entire chain.
"Why does SI use the kilogram instead of the base gram?"
The kilogram was originally called the "grave", but the name was dropped for various reasons and, in the process, some genius decided to base the default on the centimeter. Unsurprisingly, the original grave was the more convenient measure, but by then "gram" had stuck, so they popped the kilogram in its place.
"Only when a nation doesnt realise where its border is."
What about companies whose platform is global? In the US, there are "town square" laws that demand that everybody be given their soapbox in places of public congregation(the details vary, but California in particular has some strong protections in its constitution); these haven't yet been applied to the online world, but doing so would be in direct conflict with various European laws demanding Facebook, Twitter, etc take down posts the government deems "extremist". Not privacy-related, but a decent example of how direct conflicts can exist.