Posts by Carpet Deal 'em 399 publicly visible posts • joined 29 Apr 2017
Imagine you start with two watches that are synchronized: if one drifts, you never know which is wrong. If you start with three, you can tell which is defective because the other two will match. If all three are different, you've probably got bigger problems.
It may just be a story, but I recall hearing that Heineken developed a special brew for the American market to recreate the flavor of beer that had spent too long in transit because they'd managed to hook everybody on it before opening their own brewery in the US and didn't want to risk a flavor change. People get what they expect, I guess.
Mine's the one with the extralarge Hershey's bar in the pocket.
It has an atmosphere, which protects against radiation and micro-meteorites
Its atmosphere is a fraction of a percent that of earth's. That's not even thick enough to let you walk about without a pressure suit; it's certainly not going to help you against radiation or meteorites.
It's regolith is more weathered. Moon dust is razor sharp.
It's also toxic. You're still going to have to go through the same effort to avoid breathing it in.
I can't recall ever, in my 60+ years, ever needing to send something that I would be worried about it being read by the national authorities.
You don't realize the number of things you can get in trouble for sending or obtaining even in first world countries, do you? On a more harmless level, you have things like Australia's ban on women smaller than C-cup in... certain kinds of films(no matter how clear their age). I'm not quite sure of the legalities of digitally importing such material from abroad, but quite a few countries that ban the seemingly innocuous will throw you in the clink if they find out you've done so.
The Stasi also liked to deliberately rearrange things to drive dissenters insane. Different tactics strokes for different victims folks, after all.
To my naive eyes, extending the address space without heavily modifying the protocol should be possible: use the reserve bit to indicate it's an expanded packet and then include the address in the options data area. Older systems would still have to be patched, of course, but not to the degree that completely replacing the protocol requires.
The fact that is isn't called 'self drive' says more about it that people having no idea what an auto pilot does.
Tesla can argue until they're blue in the face that they only meant to invoke the avionics equipment, but nobody's going to take them seriously if they try to claim they didn't know people would take it to mean the sort of autonomy implied by the typical usage of the term. Not to excuse the driver, but it's beyond time to stop giving them the benefit of the doubt and start holding them to account.
One of the (nominal) points of the Intel Management Engine is that you can remotely control the computer, even when it's off. In other words, it's meant to undermine everything you just said(and with Intel-qwalitee security, being a person of interest almost guarantees you're screwed). AMD's PSP is less helpful, but I still wouldn't assume you need physical access to plant an OS-proof bug in there.
"antifa" is one of those terms I hear bandied around, like "SJW" that seems to be ill defined. If you are referring to people who are, as the abbreviation suggests, anti-fascist, then that really should cover 99.9% of the human population, because if you're not anti-fascist, then you either don't know what fascism is, or you are pro-fascist.
"Antifa" was the name a group gave itself; what it nominally stands for is irrelevant(does this really need to be said?). The continued invocation of its name is done to recall its actual antics - which could be quite violent. You can argue whether the invocations are correct, but that's what they are.
What happens on the internet, on social media and on messageboards, and in discussion groups, is that the hosts put in place acceptable use policies. These typically run into several pages of legalese, but the general gist is, "don't be a bigot" - i.e. don't post sexist, racist, homophobic, etc. content.
The problem is that these policies also tend to be incredibly vague(and tend to include an "other" category that's completely undefined). If the host just doesn't like something, they can almost always find a reason to do so. Thus your post on how Round-up causes cancer gets nuked as harassment(should they deign to give an excuse at all) because a certain ag company has some rather deep pockets.
My personal position on all this is that Facebook et al are big and important enough that they ought to be held to the same standard as physical privately-owned public spaces. Being digital doesn't make them categorically different.
The military couldn't get a hold of and keep the level and quality of talent needed for this even if it wanted to for one simple reason: it's the military. Personnel are held to standards that disqualify many of the choice hires, whether or not those standards are relevant to the job. Outsourcing is the only way to go about this sort of megaproject.
The opt-in requirement is strictly for "sensitive user information", which the bill defines as thus:
(A) Financial information.(B) Health information.
(C) Information pertaining to children under the age of 13.
(D) Social Security number.
(E) Precise geolocation information.
(F) Content of communications.
(G) Web browsing history, history of usage of a software program (including a mobile application), and the functional equivalents of either.
There's an opt-out requirement for most everything else. An exception to all this is made for "protect[ing] the rights or property of the provider", which stands out to me as one of the iffiest parts, but I'm not a lawyer, so this might be more problematic:
(2) COMMUNICATIONS ACT OF 1934.—Insofar as any provision of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 151 et seq.) or any regulations promulgated under that Act apply to any person, partnership, or corporation subject to this Act with respect to privacy policies, terms of service, and practices covered by this Act, the provision or regulations shall have no force or effect, unless the regulations pertain to emergency services.
Other than that, it seems pretty straight forward.
(The article links to the last Congress's version, so here's the link to the current bill)
*But safer if an asteroid hits earth*.Gambler's fallacy if I ever saw it.
That's actually one of the better arguments for space colonization at this stage, though going straight to Mars is straight-up nonsense like you point out. Cutting our teeth on lunar colonization has the benefit of help being mere days away, as well as providing a place to produce larger ships more suited for the journey at a lower price than if they had to be launched from earth, making it far and away the superior option.
If you actually want to change things for the betterment of the general population, this is exactly what you should be doing.
But how do you get support for your change if nobody hears you? Yes, there are rivals to YouTube, Facebook and Twitter, but none have anywhere near the reach Big Tech(and even traditional media) does.
Section 230 allows basic moderation, but it only goes so far:
(1) Treatment of publisher or speakerNo provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.
(2) Civil liability
No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be held liable on account of—
(A) any action voluntarily taken in good faith to restrict access to or availability of material that the provider or user considers to be obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, excessively violent, harassing, or otherwise objectionable, whether or not such material is constitutionally protected; or
(B) any action taken to enable or make available to information content providers or others the technical means to restrict access to material described in paragraph (1).
In other words, editorialization isn't protected under section 230. Given that Google, Twitter and Facebook have been doing just that in the form of selective enforcement, all that has to happen is for Uncle Sam to come down on them qua publishers with the fury of a thousand suns. At the very least, we can get some experimental data to consider when crafting any revisions.
That doesn't necessarily rule out superluminal events; it only proves that they won't follow special relativity. I doubt we'd be able to detect such things without a theory that already allows for them, though, so we'll just have to wait to see if somebody's grand unified theory is less disappointing.
Are you talking about municipal light rail/subways or Amtrak? The latter(originally created as a way for the major railroads to extricate themselves from the passenger business) is only around because there's not quite enough support there to axe the subsidies that make it possible. It's hardly surprising you got a better experience at some place that actually cares.
Remember that the Autopilot that's already installed can't be bad as the collisions we've heard about are fairly low when viewed besides the number of miles driven with Autopilot engaged.
The self-driving feature on any AI car tends to only be enabled in optimal circumstances. Human accident statistics, on the other hand, include everything from divided highways on a sunny day to blind turns with driving rain. The two aren't as comparable as advocates like to pretend.
A lawsuit to determine who to blame for stupidity; lawyers must make a living too.
The lawsuit's pro se; ie, the plaintiff is self-representing. They were definitely being idiotic(the request for subpoena mentions private medical documents as amongst the lost data, for instance), Google's a bit out of line here if they took weeks to inform a paying customer their data was deleted(during which time they probably charged the company at least once while giving the impression access would be restored).
Unless you have a plan to make the country substantially carbon-negative, then that's as good a plan as any. Most of the first world has already cut its emissions to the bone; unless China stops, going further is just an exercise in masochism. As sorrowful as it sounds, that money would be better spent building seawalls for those island nations that are under threat.
To my knowledge, nobody actually depends on ad revenue at this point. Everybody has Patreons or oter off-site ways to support their channels. Most will stay on YouTube as long as they're allowed simply for that exposure, since that's all they're getting as it is.
When it comes to the internet, ICANN is the Lord thy God. The only way to avoid this would be to completely decentralize things, which is utterly impossible with what we have. Now, it's possible we could be able to neighborly negotiate IPv6 addresses to avoid overlap, but good luck with DNS.
> Ah yes the "we shouldn't do anything because no-one else is" argument.
The UK emits about one percent of the world's CO2 emissions(less than global aviation). At some point, you're just hurting your economy to no benefit. What would help would be to harangue China into acting on its emissions, which are twice the next highest.
Stamps can be bought in rolls as large as ten thousand online, which strips away their last excuse for using a pre-paid label. Somebody might have noticed even then, but a purchase of a single product isn't likely to set off alarm bells.
Supposedly they sold at least 28 thousand packages, which works out to $314.29 each(the indictment alleges they sold on other sites as well(though without giving numbers), so that would bring the average price down a tad). They probably made it that far because they claimed it was a much less dangerous substance, so were lower on the priority list until the feds analyzed their product.
The original use of the word "robot" was for the organic kind(see R.U.R.). Meanwhile, "android" was originally applied to human-shaped automata that were actually produced(toys and novelties, basically), with the sci-fi sense coming much later(though that idea predates the term).
They're gimping multiarch as well. They've just backtracked a bit, but only just as much as major printer drivers, Steam and Wine require.
> Nothing to stop Valve shipping the relevant libraries and drivers with Steam
No, it can't. One of the big, vital things is the OpenGL library, which it needs to link to dynamically to get graphics acceleration; another issue is that shipping older versions of libstdc++ will cause drivers to not load if they're built against newer ones(I've had to deal with this more than a few times). Proper multilib support is vital for Steam to run properly on amd64 installs.
Downvote for the anecdotal downvote. The current unemployment rate is 3.6%, which is lower than any time in the last twenty years. And while it's true that the marginally attached and discouraged worker counts are still higher than in 2008, both numbers are still on a falling trajectory and the "persons not in the labor force who want a job" count is lower than any time since the "Great Recession".
So while "record levels of employment" is overstating things, it's still on the right track.
First, zips are single files; even if there's no actual compression, copying one is fundamentally the same as copying any other single file.
Second, torrented files are expected to have holes in them; copies are expected to be complete. The occasional corrupt copy from an interrupted operation is acceptable; an entire directory tree of unfinished files is not.
What you want would involve cooperation from the very structure of the file system itself. Needless to say, no major FS implements the necessary components.
I have five i386 laptops and two i386 netbooks in regular use. Why would I get rid of them when they are work fine and do what I want them to do?
Unless these were made before the mid two thousands or have first generation Atoms, then what you have is seven amd64 processors not running in long mode. Unless you're severely memory-starved, upgrading to the 64-bit version of your OS/distro is a good idea at this point.
The Register 
Biting the hand that feeds IT
Copyright. All rights reserved © 1998–2024
