Headline: "Firefox's Mozilla ..."
@author (Connor Jones) - you have the company : product relationship factually wrong and backward.
Mozilla is NOT a Firefox product, Firefox is a Mozilla product.
21 publicly visible posts • joined 15 Apr 2017
A "friend" of mine is a prolific downloader, and makes an effort to (try to) download a different artist's complete discography daily. S/he has a massive compilation, now, and s/he's never been bothered by any authorities. In the 80's s/he would borrow cassettes from the library, make a copy, take it back, rinse-&-repeat, same when CDs became common. Now, s/he uses the internet to download. S/he's still waitin' for a knock on the door, but after 35 years on the internet, it's never happened.
Critical infrastructure does not need to be connected to the internet. Employees man in-house computer workstations all day, they don't also need to enable remote connections. Any internet-facing system is vulnerable. If they don't want to be vulnerable the simple solution is to disconnect their infrastructure systems from the internet.
True, but that exploit, primarily fruitful against servers because the attackers had time to collect information, was not platform-specific and affected all OSes equally. Choosing to use a more secure OS does not render my computer or data wholly immune or impervious from harm, it only makes it [significantly] more secure than the lesser option. Still, I haven't had to install antivirus or anti-malware software in over two decades. I open and use files I know to be infected with Windows-based exploits, they don't affect and I have no concern for my system or files. I don't pass them to others, but I don't worry for my system. Unfortunately, users of the major proprietary OSes cannot do or say the same. I spend 100 hours / week working on fixing, cleaning, updating, recovering data from mostly Windows-based computers; what a pain and waste of money and time fixing something when there's a better option ... of course, I don't mind too much, I get the satisfaction of helping someone and the fair compensation for the work.
Well, I've been using Linux for 24 years and I haven't had a virus, adware, trojan, worm, ransomware, or any other malware in that time ... feel free to narrow your arbitrarily vague caveat to specifically when I should be concerned and utterly afraid of the conceptually possible, pending doom.
I noticed there was no mention of the possibility this was an intentional act to boost product benchmark scores, compared to Intel's rival(s), by purposely avoiding a known processing bottleneck.
It's certainly not tin-foil hat territory to expect corporations to cut corners to garner a competitive edge of rival products, with the understanding of we'll admit to the insecurity later, after we've made $BILLIONS in profit, and roll out the fix.
Cynically, I have no doubt of shameful actions such as the above-mentioned, because rapacious corporations, C-level officers, and board members must absolve themselves of any human decency to maintain a position of privilege, and that supplants anything of value.
Well said!!
I swap dozens of users over to Linux every year, now. They never return with problems, only an occasional question on how to do something - so satisfying.
Prior to that it was customers returning every 6 months, infected, or crashed, or missing files, or running slow, can't get on this site, can't open this file, or or or ...
I bet Gates secretly uses Linux so he doesn't have to worry about getting a virus, or hacked, or ransomware, lol.
I'm fond of any BSD flavour, but OpenBSD is tighter on security than all the others.
I see a huge difference between the time Linux CVEs, once know of, are dealt with by the community, compared to how slow M$ deals with theirs.
Most of the time it's hours to days for Linux fixes, where, from what I've witnessed over the years, M$ takes anywhere from days to years to fix issues theirs. I seem to recall numerous CVEs which M$ took 6 - 12 months to fix and others years to fix.
Even better is the OpenBSD model, their code is severely scoured and exhaustively scrutinized for possible problems before release, so they opt to only release every 6 months - that's confidence, that's impressive!
Not really.
The security on Unix-variants is different than Windows. What does Windows do to thwart installing software? pops up a box which says "Are you sure you want to install this program? ... OK/Cancel" - which can be scripted to click the OK/YES button and the software gets installed.
If you want to install on a Unix-variant (less secure platforms Mac & Android excepted) you need to know the user's password - that's little detail makes a huge difference in being able to corrupt a non-M$ system.
No system is perfect, but it takes me less than 5 minutes to crack a Windows system remotely. If I have to spend that, or longer, trying to just get past a Linux pw requirement, I'm not going to bother - there are easier targets.
And ^that is precisely why Windows is responsible for being targeted by approximately 85% of all malware - it's so freakin' easy to own a Windows machine. Now, Mac and Android - having changed security requirements - are likewise being hit and gaining % of the malware attempts.
Same here, I put complete newbs on Mint and they're fine right from the start. Likewise, I never get any tech support requests.
Installing Win-X on someone's system guarantees I'll get a call "I can't find my files", "I can't change my home page", "how do I install Java?", "my computer's running slow", ... etc, it's never-ending.