Common sense prevails?
Admittedly, I'm no expert in law ... particularly "the spirit of it". But - I have to say - this all feels like mere common sense prevailing - no?
I've always tried to pay what's due. I've found that impossible (for budget reasons) with several charitable causes I help look after the IT for - second hand Cisco hardware from eBay, still has plenty of physical life in it - but I can't get firmware updates - unless I'm willing to part with epic money. So I buy another (dead - for "spares/repairs") router/switch with newer firmware - and treat that as "fair".
Kinguin I think claimed a similar victory in the EU? I feel like it's greyer - clearly some (a lot?) of the licenses on there were bought under volume licensing agreements or whatever.
But then, again, I have to be honest ... maybe if these companies charged £50 rather than £250 ... ? It bemuses me that for Windows Pro (for example), I can get a second-hand "digitally entitled" laptop from work for less than the Pro license itself. For charitable purposes, the charity pricing schemes are great in principle - but require a lot of paperwork and hoop-jumping (especially if your charity is in any way religious or otherwise standing for "particularly conservative values").
Ho-hum. </ramble>
Anyone got any advice? Am I missing the obvious?