And still putting...
...5400 RPM HDDs in their expensive laptops.
2630 publicly visible posts • joined 27 Feb 2017
True. The two I chatted to were old skool and had been there since the 70s. Now both retired. Both were professional typists but didn't know that much about computers. But knew their area well. Good at typing, good at Word and Excel, good at creating macros for themselves within said packages to make tasks easier and very good at shorthand. Although not a good idea writing your passwords in plain sight, one did it in shorthand, knowing pretty much all the other staff didn't understand what it said, I believe the shorthand was unique to her as she'd adapted it. One is long retired, other one only a year. But in that time no longer uses a PC or shorthand so has forgotten it all.
Branches are also useful because you know that, unless someone on the inside has set them up, their cash machines are 99% clean and not compromised. Not compromised by hidden pin hole cameras with card skimmers attached. And you know this because they are unavailable when the bank is closed and during the day, no sensible crook would try to rig them with all the staff watching.
Because banks want to make as much money as they can get. From what I've read over the years, banks IT systems are always poor. So I bet they could of done what you suggest but "Want to save some money so we won't".
Not in the same vain but was in Nationwide recently, and they couldn't even be bothered to buy them new privacy filters. So the cashier was having to hold the privacy filter in place because it kept falling off. What was it held on by? Bluetac. The Bluetac was so old even that was failing.
jesus!
are mostly evil and all they care about is making a sale to get their bonus. You could try to argue this is like gun makers and gun shop owners being responsible for mass shootings, but this is different. They wouldn't sell to people they knew were going to commit mass shootings. However, from what they are saying in this case, it looks like they are accusing Salesforce of knowing what the site was being used for, yet kept selling them their software. I guess will see if the courts agree with that view or not.
But paying with Bitcoin is also traceable so you'd want to "clean" your bitcoin first with like minded individuals. Then pay with said bitcoin making said bitcoin untraceable. But when "cleaning" you do run the risk of the other individual just stealing the coins.
I currently use AirVPN. Seem OK for me so far. Just want to avoid Virgin's shitty filtering so the VPN purchase is traceable on my card.
...considering at work a few months back we got sent a phishing email. Oh look, its spoofing an NHS.net email account. Check the headers. OK, that's interesting, its not spoofed. The return address is valid. So someone has broken into an NHS.net account and using it to send phishing info. Nice. Why don't they have 2fa on? Unless their device was compromised as well.
I reported to nhs.net. Never did get a reply. Rude.
...but don't use it here much. But the A-Team sound like cunts.
I can't stand engineers like that. It's fine fobbing of a user now and then if you have other urgent work to do and if they are very difficult and won't take "We're not sure why its doing it but we're still investigating. It's ongoing" as a reason you need to move on. But flat out saying that's how its suppose to work just to shut them up, then not working out what the issue is. And then telling someone that might actually be able to work it out to "not bother as we've already looked. Just tell them that's how it work" And then dismissing that person after when they actually find the fix because it made you look stupid, is a dick move.
I suspect he was glad he actually now didn't work for that "A-Team". Was it Arsehole-Team, see what I did there.
As even when everything is going to shit, you appear to have to keep at it. With all the money he's got, if I was Zuck, I'd quit now before it all goes tits up and you lose all that money. Although I'm sure he'll have invested money in other areas that can't be touched when Facebook starts going down like MySpace.
...I read an interesting story in one of Kevin Mitnick's books. Of an sysadmin who was a bit of a dick but equally so was the director or whoever managed him. So summoned him up to a meeting in front of everyone and fired him. Then stupidly allowed him back to his desk for the rest of the day.
When evening came and all was quiet and he was long gone, all the servers rebooted and wiped themselves. Although pretty obvious, there wasn't enough evidence left to be able to pin it on the fired sysadmin.*
*It was read many years ago so may not be accurate retelling of said story.
They cut costs in IT to save money? IT departments are always seen as unimportant for some reason. When nothing is happening they are accused of "Not being required. Everything runs fine and you never seem to be doing anything" or "we keep having outages since cutting your budget so we'll outsource you".
I did that but only to my home Netgear ReadyNAS. That claimed it was hotswappable. So when one drive failed I put a new drive in. It should of started to copy the data over but it didn't. For some reason it decided to copy the blank drive to the data drive.
When I realised what had gone wrong, I sat R-Studio sitting there all week checking the drive so I could restore it. Pretty much got everything back.
I meant to say "and now a wide spread ban on tobacco advertising is in place". Problem with typing on the phone.
Anyway. It may have fallen but is this due to the lack of advertising or better education, that would be the big question.
But it won't. If a nutter isn't able to watch said footage it doesn't stop them being a nutter.
Obviously nowhere near as bad, not even in the same league but they banned cigarette adverts on TV in the 60s (didn't stop cigar adverts) and now wide spread tabbaco advertising is in place but it hasn't stopped people smoking.
I'm not saying the live streaming of mass murder should exist, I'm saying banning it from a medium won't stop a nutter being a nutter.
I feel the fact is Facebook is big enough now and has enough cash it can easily tackle this problem. As IT people we understand more than MPs how the Internet works. We are realistic. We know if you ban it from Facebook it will just pop up in other areas. But the point is we also know of realistic ways Facebook could combat this. But MPs chiming in saying they should remove footage 10mins (I can't remember the exact figure) from being reported is stupidly unrealistic. Letting MPs decide on an area of tech they don't understand and won't listen to expects makes issues worse. We have the 18 age ID coming in for porn. A classic example of MPs getting involved and not understanding how the Internet works and how that will fail due to VPNs. And this is the same government that was suggesting encryption should be banned.
Its not an excuse for what the cock did but with the like of Facebook etc, its all about money. Having to actually pay decent wage to real people to watch said videos cuts into profit. Because share holders want more money they convince the powers that be to save money where you can. They see this monitoring area as a saving so do a half arsed job knowing they are so big now, they won't be shutdown and can get away with just saying sorry.
Never understood the point of live streaming anyway. And I'd rather they implement a 30 min or hour delay on the streams than allow government to start regulating the Internet.
"which has been re-shared by miscreants" which includes a few newspapers who aired a short clip of said footage. Knowing fall well people would click on their article with the video footage than an article without it. Then they gain from the ads on said page. The people clicking those article links are the same people that slow down when there is an accident. These newspapers are as bad as Facebook.
However regulation on the Internet isn't going to stop nutters like this. Its foolish to think it will.
You have a slightly correct point stuff being bought back in house maybe equally as shit however it can equally be good and cheaper. They quote low to get a contract then stiff you year on year with higher prices.
"The director just needs a laptop replaced at short notice" crapita IT "We can do that but as you want us to break SLA they'll be a charge for that". We as inside IT "That's fine. Although its against SLA we can get it done quick, obviously no extra charge" and so on.
I've seen an NHS trust moan about internal IT despite us being fucking good and they got value for money. They outsourced after I left to Crapita. That trust has regretted it ever since.
Apple have been fucking people over for to long. Just look at the recent news footage in the US. Where they took a broken Mac to the Genius bar who claimed it would cost over $1000 to repair. Took it to Louis who has a store in New York and a YouTube channel, but isn't an authorised repair shop. He said the perm fix would be over $100. Clearly showing how much Apple are ripping off their customers.
Not only that. But these stores are order screens from the same factory as Apple. But Apple are telling customs to seize them on import. Arseholes.
This is much like how Steve Jobs tried to make Jailbreaking illegal. Luckily he lost in court. What a dick.
Yes but a simple search shows jet lag is just your body clock being out. Sleeping helps, no medication does, no fancy "cure" does.
Not poking fun at anyone. Just has always annoyed me people coming up with all different fancy "cures". But then I am a grumpy fuck so lots of things annoy me.
I never knew what it was when growing up. Thought it was this mystical thing only the rich got (as we couldn't afford to fly anywhere). I know it's only a movie but kinda makes my point is the Thomas Crown Affair, the 1999 one. When Rene Russo's character makes out she is super cool and has this magical cure for "jet lag" by drinking some weird shit.
Then I had very mild case of it, and realise it was just tiredness due to the body clock being out. Went to sleep for hours and was fine for rest of trip. But yeah, I guess it's worse flying to the other side of world unless you can get some sleep on the plane.
Melatonin is also a potential pseudoscience. There are no decent clinical trials that show it helps for Jet Lag or sleep disorders. Much like Remedy Rescue, was recommended to me years ago for my anxiety. I tried it, it was bollocks. It has no effect unless you "believe" it has an effect. As I don't believe in bullshit, it had no effect on me. It has a tiny amount of alcohol in it, that is the only possible reason it could help with anxiety.
Anyway. I'm ready for the down votes, but I like this forum as we seem free to speak our minds without to much of a kicking.
It's possible, if he's faked his death and from reading the report it sounds quite plausible he has, he'll have emptied them before his death so as not to flag that they were emptied after his death.
Could this almost be the perfect heist. Stealing cryptocurrency that will be harder to trace than real money and which he can then attempt to "clean" through trades with other people wanting to "clean" theirs?
This will be interesting to watch.
""At 1.3 seconds before impact, the self-driving system determined that emergency braking was needed to mitigate a collision," the NTSB says in its report summary. "According to Uber, emergency braking maneuvers are not enabled while the vehicle is under computer control to reduce the potential for erratic vehicle behavior."
The safety driver is supposed to handle emergency braking, but the car's systems weren't set up to alert the driver of the need for intervention, according to the NTSB."
And they aren't being hit with a massive fine for that MASSIVE flaw!!!! How the fuck have they gotten away with that!?!?!
Did Uber say "Don't blame us, blame the safety human person. Even though if the system had alerted them to hit the breaks, 1.3 seconds before impact was never going to be enough for them to react, blame them anyway."
Were brown envelopes involved?
Military equipment and medical equipment is expensive due to the extensive tests they all have to go through. The whole story ended up being pointless as they never said what was in it. Even if it was a generic mobile, the cost is due to the extensive testing they've had to shell out for. So it covers the R&D and testing.