Good article and somewhat points to what LBRY were saying
They were saying Trumps YouTube channel was now available on LBRY blah blah. I'm a supporter of LBRY, I'm on LBRY but people were then having a bit of a go at them on Twatter. But their point was, and they do appear to admit they didn't explain this well. That Trump should have free speech, doesn't mean you have to agree with what he is saying but that he has a right to say it. And if you allow him that free speech, we can see all the bollocks he is saying and point out that what he is saying is bollocks. Yes, I guess we have the issue that a lot of Trump supporters are stupid enough that they will only listen to his view but still. If you start silencing him for being a cock, what is next?
Its much like the Track and Trace apps and data they hold. I guess we agree they are useful but now, after all the worry that it was going to happen, Singapore have now said all the data their apps hold, the police will now have access. If you want the public to start distrusting you, that's the way to do it. Don't expect them to cooperate if there is another outbreak of something else.
And back to Twatter, not that I care for it much but it has been amusing watching Trump have a breakdown on it. But what he did last Wednesday was the worst. I've been critical of him all the time he's been on there. But I do like posts to be factual on both sides. Lucy Lawless or Xena: Warrior Princess fame also dislikes Trump but incorrectly said about a video played, that Trump was in the tent watching the riots happening and enjoying it. I had to point out that
"He's a cunt but that was before it all kicked off. You can't make out it was after as it wasn't. He's still a cunt though".
Appears Twotter didn't like this and this morning I have been given a 12 hour suspension for "Hateful conduct". Ironic. Apparently I can get that down to 9 hours if I delete the tweet they dislike, so I did. But while reading the message "We've temporarily limited some of your account features" it jumped back up to suspended for 12 hours again, so that's clearly a bug. I assume if I had millions of followers and making them a nice chunk of change from adverts, I'd have probably just gotten a warning.
Not that fuss really as not a fan of Twitter and yes, they are their servers and they pay for the bandwidth but when does it become and issue when a massive media platform decides what can and can't be said? It is a difficult one as obviously the threat of violence to others is never good.