It is very simple
"The only control or ‘guardrails’ that AI needs is a STRONG AND SMART (High IQ!) PRESIDENT, and the U.S.A. has that, in spades!"
49 publicly visible posts • joined 22 Feb 2017
It is conceivable that in a dark future, where the Law and Government have been replaced by tech corporations and their owners, as the current trend indicates, murder by AI will be avoided, or at least the chances of it happening will be reduced, by assigning monetary value to living beings, including humans, with the cartel of corporations agreeing on the value assignment criteria.
The Utility Provider mention is very often used to indicate that a provided service will eventually become so ubiquitous and similar between different providers that it becomes similar to water and electricity.
As an example of AI already being served as a service is in your IDE, which already allows you to select whichever AI provider you want for coding assistance.
The persistence or not of such a model or any individual provider will depend entirely on the demand and willingness to pay for the service they provide.
Indeed the quality of the service, which you mention with relation to AI, is always one of many factors involved, in the selection of one service or other, or indeed the continuation of the type of service altogether. For example, electric cars were built in the 1890s but for various reasons were eclipsed at the time.
Considering that the services provided by the rival AI companies are so similar and that they all follow standards, it seems inevitable that they will eventually become commoditized and the companies, as they stand, would become utility providers. The rush to the monetization, which would be the means to enhance their services and to diversify, through the IPOs, looks like an indicator that this is fast approaching.
It is worrying that, at a time when we have reached a level of civilization where, state censorship is rightly not considered acceptable, at the same time, a bit like the boiling frog, we are slowly eased into accepting that private, unelected and increasingly unchecked authorities, can and do apply censorship. This trend looks like it would eventually include justice, considering that these private authorities have the power to block you out, based on their terms, conditions and self-defined moral standards, even though their services are increasingly becoming fundamental to everyday life.
This Patch Tuesday release just killed my ExplorerPatcher, configured for Windows 10 style Taskbar and Start menu.
I now I have to try to adjust my brains to the illogical logic of the Windows 11 menu organization and come to terms with the additional effort required finding what I want, until ExplorerPatcher publish a fix.
The use of AI to recognize nude pictures and to act based on that, is the first step towards automating justice and considering, at least for now, that AI cannot be trusted 100% to not hallucinate, this can be an accident waiting to happen, with a scandal which would make the Post Office one seem a lightweight.
The issue with Palantir handling sensitive data, such as related to the NHS, the Police, Secret Services, Defense etc. is that despite any assurance they may provide today, about data being encrypted and not visible to the them, since they are simple carriers, they would still be one of the suspects in the current trend to scavenge as much encrypted data as possible, during the available windows of opportunity, between all encryption being Quantum Computing hardened and Quantum Computing becoming widely available.
When working with the dotnet part of the Microsoft Agent Framework, which has been released to production, you constantly hit new cases of API changes, introducing breaks in existing code, which are not reflected in the official documentation or the samples. You get the feeling that this is intentional, a kind of dark pattern, where the use of AI assistants is becoming obligatory.
So Google's logic has up to now been that a technology which cannot yet be trusted for mission critical tasks can, nevertheless, be trusted to decide on its own how much it will require on chargeable resources, with no upper limits.
And they claim this is to prevent business having a hard service outage once they pass an artificial system quota, although the resulting costs may in fact result in the business having to cease to exist.
With the new format, articles now appear like they used to on the BBC site in the 90s, at a time when they were formatted for lower screen resolutions.
The left and right margins are always given a fixed width as if they are more important than the actual content of the article which may become unreadable. This is a childish design to display adverts, again taking us back to the early days of the Internet was young and designers were making amateur mistakes.
An example of how the start of an article shows in portrait mode on a tablet.
Visitors to London's iconic
Telecom Tower might soon be
able to go for a rooftop swim,
according to plans revealed by
the developer turning the
building into a hotel.
The space on the left and the right of the article text takes up more than twice the width of the article text.
Combine this with accessing LinkedIn using Chrome and you are potentially all set for the autonomous operation of your machine on your behalf. Perhaps in the future having Recall running would provide the necessary checks, through advanced telemetry, to the third parties operating your machine.
I love Jetbrains IDEs because they are true developer's IDEs and not biased by some business decisions not directly related to the process of development.
The existence of the Rider IDE is also a great enabler for the transition to Linux, since it works the same way in both Windows and Linux (minus Win Forms in Linux but there are other multi platform options such as Avalonia).
I hope all this AI business does not make Jetbrains follow ugly practices / dark patterns, which have become standard in the industry and lead to loss of trust.
The license fee was introduced at a time when few homes had a radio or a television and it would have been unfair to charge the whole population for the services. Today, there are few homes without a television, therefore BBC costs ought to be covered by taxes, where they might also be calculated more fairly, based on household income.
I expected this sentence to continue that many have expressed the desire for more AI functionality in the browser, since we have come to expect false statements, which are diametrically opposite to what users want, from big companies and was shocked that it actually acknowledged that many do not want AI.
Does this mean the consumer will continue to pay for subscriptions, with ever increasing prices, but the service providers will be increasingly using the consumer's local machines and electricity for an increasing amount of computing?