Re: They can't really complain about the racist backlash
The poor thing was rebooted in Safe Mode w/o networking.
245 publicly visible posts • joined 19 Feb 2017
... got a request for faeces sample with a sampling kit and the brochure. Deciding to be a good citizen, gathered the sample. Then read the brochure and discovered I gathered the sample all wrong. Said "Oh, well..." and threw everything (incorrectly gathered sample, rest of the kit, and the brochure) in the trash. Now I'll tell this story to my grandchildren: "This is how your grandpa couldn't get his shit together..."
P.S. Mr. Dabbs, I want to thank you for all your rants I enjoy!
First they outsource production to Asia because it's cheaper, now they want money infusion to "bring production back to American soil". Why it is not on American soil in the first place? I swear, I start to like Trump's approach: "Bring the production home or pay the import dues!"
... and you will come to inevitable conclusion that the cats are not only self-aware, but they champion a superior (to us humans) intelligence. Which, given their rather tiny brains, is mystifying. My wife thinks cats are "thin clients" connected directly to The Universe.
Same with dogs.
Atheism is not absence of faith.
Agnosticism is.
Atheism is faith in non-existence of god(s). Atheists are very religious people who fervently believe there is no god. Believe, because non-existence of god cannot be proven just like god's existence cannot.
In this regard atheists don't differ from other religious people ("true believers"). And, I must add, all have equal right to exist and advertise their beliefs.
>If he works hard at school, gets a good degree, and proves himself then,..., they’ll coddle him and pay him well. On the other hand, if he idles his life away, Amazon will offer him 50 years of slavery...
What can I say?
A) This sounds fair - you work hard, you get money; you don't - you don't.
B) Unhappy at Amazon? Go somewhere else, you're not a slave, you're an employee, you can quit anytime.
Jeez, Bloomberg thinks it's not enough it beshat itself in 2018, it goes for encore. Do they want to became a common word like "xerox" or "kleenex" as in "this is a crock of bloomberg"?
No evidence then, no evidence now, just blah-blah. I lost my respect for Bloomberg in 2018 after this load of crap was first aired, and now I see I made no mistake then.
Seriously. I love India and believe in its hi-tech future. But...
Fighting Apple will be hard: you cannot legally clone iOS and AppStore. You may have more luck trying to reduce Apple's footprint on Indian market.
Cloning Android and GooglePlay is possible (just ask Huawei), so I'd look in that direction.
All this, however, hints at a rather unexpiring future: there are N countries in the world with each having its own Android clone and its own Play store, because all N countries got fed up with Google dictate, and all N countries busy at getting rid of Apple as much as possible, because they are fed up with Apple dictate. Sad picture, but what can one do? Apple will be Apple, and Google will be Google.
" When someone the size of Amazon dumps you, everyone else will deny you due to reputational damage.”
Talk to Pirate Bay, Mr. Matze, maybe they'll host Parler? It could be even cheaper than AWS. Even if it isn't, there are two big advantages: 1) PB seems to be unkillable; 2) they take it easy about "reputational damage".
Interestingly, it's not TATA or HPE or IBM that lobby against H1B limitations most fervently. It's Google, Facebook, Amazon, Microsoft et al. Minimal wages limitation will rob these companies of that part of the profit that comes from importing cheap Indian pseudo-graduates to replace experienced American workers. Yes, American, whatever their extraction is, because by now (being experienced) they are Americans.
With cardinal amendment: "this section applies to information exchange platforms, which conduct no reviewing, policing, or censure of the users' data".
Thus, Telegram, AWS, Azure, Google Cloud, etc. are still subjects to Section 230, and Facebook and Twitter are not.
No need to drop Section 230 just because two or three "platforms" are not "platforms" in fact. Simply exclude them.
Think: if a "platform" is policing the user data, how can it be held irresponsible of this data?