Re: $200/kg
Those $150/kg you are offering need to include electricity to power the kit for around 5 years.
105 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Jan 2017
How many years until you can feed a movie script into a generative AI, press the "Generate" button and get a semi-finished movie? Pick your characters from a ready made library, do some interactive polishing and your blockbuster is ready for YouTube. 10 years? Spending $300mln to make a movie will be seen as one of the quaint things they did back then...
> The outrage here is that the machines are no longer coming for the jobs of the working class who toil and sweat and use their hands.
Funnily enough, these jobs now look safer than a lot of so called "knowledge worker" jobs. Why pay for a photographer when you can have glamour shots from a short prompt and a crappy selfie?
What I was thinking was more along generative AI that you can tell: Make me a new episode of Seinfeld where Jerry get's his jokes from ChatGTP 10. Or generating outlawed content. A significant part of the creative content industry (film, music, gaming, books) as we know it today might well be gone 10 years from now.
We already see fashion photography being replaced by generated images. I don't think anybody predicted this as one of the first trades to be taken over by AI.
It's supposed to be a positive feedback loop: AI used to build improved AI...
This even has a name "positive Singularity Feedback Loop". Right now this would be the slow, initial phase, of course.
Quote from MIT Review:
> Most visions of this singularity focus on the creation of machines intelligent enough to devise machines even more intelligent than themselves, and so forth recursively, thus launching a positive feedback loop of intelligence amplification.
It's not just Governments. If money and contracts get involved, things get complicated everywhere. This adds so much friction, that it suddenly might not be worth it.
In public organizations that would usually trigger requirements to issue an open tender. These requirements are there for a good reason, but they don't fit the open source model.
The decision to use a certain Open Source component is usually up to individual developers who usually don't have budget authority. They just do it. If there was some kind of contract with payments involved, things would slow down to a crawl: That would require an aqucisition process that might not even be suitable for most projects (a Patreon account doesn't fit).
I'll bite and I'll argue that it is capitalist efficiency that gives us a fighting chance against climate change. It's easy to forget how awfully wasteful the alternatives were and still are. Just look at Venezuela, the socialism of the 21st century. Capitalism isn't fair, but at least it creates the ressources we will need to meet the climate challenge. The alternatives create less out of even worse environmental damages.
Your argument reminds me of AOC arguing against the billions of "subsidies" for Amazon HQ2 in NY. She suggested that the money should be spent to improve poor communities instead. The problem: The subsidies were mostly tax incentives. No HQ2, no revenue to tax, no subsidies but even less money for social projects.
> to think about the profit-destroying requirements of saving the planet
Profits and saving the planet aren't mutually exclusive. Green technologies are big business now (think wind, solar, EVs,...). In fact, I'd argue that economic incentives (e.g. profits) are the most promising way to tackle the climate crisis. Only if dirty technologies are out competed by clean solutions will we have a durable solution. Otherwise somebody will try to cheat.
Cloud computing is the equivalent to public transportation: They are like trains or buses instead of cars. An individual bus is much less efficient than a car, but it is shared among a lot of riders.
Same for cloud computing resources: instead of being 99% idle, they actually get used (I just checked: my laptop currently uses 1% of its CPU).
Nope. StarLink requires "landing rights" in each nation. StarLink in China will either go through the Great Firewall or not be available. Same is true everywhere else: Play by the local rules or don't play at all.
Example: https://spacewatch.global/2020/01/uks-oneweb-awarded-satellite-communications-landing-rights-in-nigeria/