Re: Going to be awkward
The higher protocols don't necessarily mean higher frequencies. It's just that you won't get the speed benefits of 5G on lower frequencies, where there's less bandwidth.
1977 publicly visible posts • joined 13 Aug 2007
It'll be fine for the driver and passengers in the Cybertruck if they hit a car, because the Cybertruck will cannibalize the crumple zones of the other vehicle. It will go less well if they hit a brick wall or other immovable object.
And even at that a lot of drivers are quitting. Uber relies on people being too foolish to realize they won't make back what they pay in fuel, vehicle depreciation, and insurance costs; once people have done it for a while and realize they're losing money, they quit. Uber is starting to run out of fools.
In the US at least, yes, airlines are required to participate in investigations. There's also a safety program where pilots are encouraged to voluntarily report "near misses" and other incidents that might not rise to the level of a formal investigation; information they report this way can't be used against them in any kind of license action, so there's a strong incentive to participate.
Possibly deemed not worth the risk. Any time you have something maneuvering near the ISS under its own power, you risk a stuck thruster or maneuvering error causing it to crash into part of the station. This is also why supply vehicles don't dock under their own power, they park within reach of the Canadarm and are retrieved.
In the US, truly unsupervised autonomous trains are mostly confined to situations where the right-of-way is completely off-limits to humans -- elevated railways or subways with platform doors. The technology of running the train safely is solved but not dealing with all the things that can get into an unguarded right-of-way.
If this were a viable path studios would already be casting their films with non-AI impersonators of big-name actors, and paying them next to nothing. The fact that they don't suggests they feel they need that big name on the poster to draw people in. Also, people are put off by uncanny-valley lookalikes of faces they know well.
My experience is that computer science researchers and programmers rarely make good sysadmins, for the same reason that aircraft designers aren't necessarily good pilots. They're just different skill sets. I worked at a job where the developers initially maintained their own systems, and it was something of a disaster until most of those responsibilities were handed over to me. They were smart guys and good at setting up their development environments, but were completely uninterested in the "boring" work of running backups and installing security patches.
Oh man, that list of cards takes me back. Especially the Orinoco cards, which at one point were the standard thing to buy if you wanted a PCMCIA WiFi card that would work with Linux. They came in two varieties, Orinoco Gold and Orinoco Silver, depending on what level of WEP encryption they supported.
I find it's a wash because my Apple phones last longer than my Android phones did. Partly this is the result of repair services being available for Apple phones that aren't really for most Android phones. The fact that Apple actually bothers to put out OS updates for their phones helps too.
I performed more than one recovery from similar situations based on two bits of knowledge:
- Unlike DOS FDISK, Linux fdisk doesn't overwrite any data in the partition itself, so if you know the partition sizes you can use it to re-create a missing MBR
- FAT32 stores a spare copy of the boot sector in sector 6.
Fix the partition table, then use DEBUG (or a sector editor, if you've got one handy) to copy sector 6 to sector 0, and you've resurrected the filesystem.
A lot of the N1's problems were quality control related. One launch failed because someone left a bolt inside a propellant tank and a turbopump ingested it and grenaded, for example. They weren't even testing every engine before flight, something I believe SpaceX is doing. However, the two spacecraft do have a rushed development process in common.
The government, at least in the US, has no legal power to remove content. They can ask, which is what they did, but as the existence of many right-wing social media networks demonstrates there would have been no consequences for refusal other than being asked again.
I think this is an odd take because disseminating information is what a lot of government agencies DO. What's next, software companies suing to stop CISA from distributing CVEs, because the government shouldn't be telling us whether software is insecure?
For casual stargazing it's not that big a deal. None of this stuff is internally lit, and the satellites that are visible to the naked eye are in low orbit, so you just have to wait until it's all in the Earth's shadow. That takes a couple hours but it takes that long for the sky to get properly dark and your eyes to adjust anyway.
The real hazard here is that a lot of near-earth asteroids can ONLY be imaged just after dusk or just before dawn, so our ability to see an object that might smack us back into the stone age is getting worse over time.