Re: Fortune 500
Which company and why was it so good?
Also, had they outsourced and/or offshored?
6375 publicly visible posts • joined 26 Aug 2016
Avoiding system proxy settings and being able to specify my own is one of the reasons why I have Firefox on my Mac. Annoyingly this Mac seems to get very confused and miss out bit of the proxy file causing it to swap proxies frequently, being able to override it and use a proxy is the right continent is very useful.
Simply saying "dayley-mayell" is enough to get you on a BBC Radio 4 comedy. Probably for life.
In case you haven't seen this wonderful spearing of the panel game format
Good lord. What more can a mail client do than fetch,read,archive, compose and send e-mail
Calendars, task tracking, contacts... Of course working out if having them all together is a good thing is left as an exercise for the reader.
Outlook/Exchange can also do things like surveys within emails. If you go all in for Windows/Office then there are also things like (love 'em or hate 'em) OneNote, Skype for Business, SharePoint which all interact with each other.
You do need Windows really for this though, I'm on a Mac right now and not of the above work that well compared to Windows.
Britain doesn't value or pay technical people very well. You don't need to move as far as Texas or Australia to get a more sensible salary; places elsewhere in Europe like Germany and Switzerland both pay much better. Many international companies and universities in Continental Europe work in English these days too.
You'd better get used to lager and not Real Ale though... ->
My current least favourite sales tactic is sending you meeting invites so they appear in your calendar and intrusively pop up on my work phone too. The selfsame company also sent a message saying "Hi $NAME, no love for $CRAPPYCOMPANY". I actually quite like their products but have no inclination to engage with them.
They should all be forced to walk the plank ->
2TB/day is a new storage array every 3-6 months, PLUS the power to keep it online.
This is one of the scenarios where scale-out NASes work rather well. I'd rather hope they have some kind of data management software to control what gets saved and archived etc.
Other institutions like CSCS (Swiss National Supercomputing Centre) run their weather codes on Nvidia GPUS; it could be rather fun to see how these architectures perform in the medium to long term.
Isn't it time that the hospitals regard allowing this kind of behaviour by staff as a disciplinary and not an IT issue? If $HOSPITAL_EMPLOYEE did something like leave a bag of leaking clinical waste out in a corridor or gossip about patients' illnesses then HR would get involved; I don't see why a negligent act* on a computer should be any different.
*I'm assuming the staff member is opening dodgy attachments and not some kind of "drive by" attack
Why it takes 2 or 3 days to get money from mainland europe to England in 2017 is beyond me.
It takes that kind of time to transfer money between accounts in my Swiss bank*. I miss the inter-bank money transfer speed that I used to have in the UK. I've heard that German banks are even less slower!
* I live in Switzerland, I'm not being "creative" with my taxes.
Maybe the people who installed Mongo just needed a webscale database or even just sharded /dev/null
I'd hazard a guess that, to an external observer, the difference between malware encryption and background disk defragmentation is quite small.
With disc fragmentation, surely it's just blocks being moved around the disc. I think that zipping files and deleting the originals would be nearer.
There are backup strategies that offer a defense against this kind of attack but they add significant complexity to the system.This is a school system - probably with a system administrator who is getting paid a pittance,
This is a "school" in the American sense, so actually what we rightpondians would call a university.
From the linked PDF:
How did we pay for it?The District has a cybersecurity insurance policy to address these specific types of cyber intrusions and it
was activated during this incident.
I cannot believe that insurance exists for paying out to ransomeware; it'll do is to support the "market" for this kind of attack. I could understand some kind of insurance to payout for some advanced geeky for data recovery, but not for this.