Are they telling the truth about it?
I have been trying to find pictures of people who have been burned by it and haven't been able to. Seeing how much people love to complain about everything and anything on the internet, especially on social networks. And given that Intel said that 0.2%, or 2 people per 1000, have been burned by the watch, surely many people would have posted pictures complaining about what the watch did to them. But I wasn't able to find a single one. I think they are lying about what the watch truly does to people. Sure, it may be burning people but perhaps it isn't their skin that it burns. It may be white blood cells; consequently leaving you more vulnerable to infections, or maybe it causes skin cancer or blood cancer (leukemia). I'm not lawyer and I don't know much about liability but I think that Intel may be offering a full refund on the watches only because it takes away their liability for health problems or injuries that have been caused by the watch. I am directing this comment towards the administrator/s of this website as I don't have the resources to look into it more in depth and there isn't much more I can do. Please look into it
Biting the hand that feeds IT
