Re: Ccea blocks me, why?
Just a nitpick, and I know you were "quoting" a US website, but the GDPR has no requirement relating to cookies that causes this kind of behaviour. The ePrivacy Directive of 2002 holds this responsibility!
24 publicly visible posts • joined 3 Aug 2016
I live in eastern France (region Grand Est), where FTTP has just about 100% coverage. I live in a small village, and had it for 3 years now, but just went with 400Mb up and down, guaranteed not "up to" . Doesn't cost much more for 2Gb.
Talking to family in the UK, much cheaper for me; without a phone it's under €30 a month. And with a phone I get free calls in Europe and USA.
Some of the comments (and the article!) seem to be based on some lack of knowledge on how Liquid Fluoide Thorium Reactors work. For example they don't use water coolant in the primary circuit, but probably would use it in the secondary circuit to drive steam turbines. Uses a lot less water as this can be nearly a closed circuit with recovery.
Anyway, a simple YouTube explanation https://youtu.be/nYxlpeJEKmw as a starter
I wish they'd leave SMS alone. Whatsapp etc. are great, but must have a data connection to work. SMS will work when you are in low signal areas where you can't get even EDGE or 3G (they still exist). I sometimes find that SMS will work when voice won't as it keeps trying until your recipient wanders into a signal.
Also for those without decent data roaming contracts when abroad. So a great fall back. Suspect that carriers will want to keep it; how else can they send you messages to sign up to a nice expensive data roaming option?
Delivery notification could be nice if it could be added easily and non-disruptively. For example, I have developed my own protocol to cover some of this (patent in creation). I add the words "please reply or call when you get this" to the message :-)
How the 2 sets of Directives and Regulations interact is a full and complex subject. My point was that when I see an "expert" making a number of statements but with a large factual error in the basic explanation I am not inclined to look at those statements with much belief.
GDPR makes only one short mention of cookies, and that is to clarify that where cookies may contain private data OR may be used in any way that allows an individual to be identified, then this is private data as covered by GDPR.
Being picky, but why concentrate on cookie consent with regard to any discussion on GDPR?
The GDPR does not mandate much about cookies. They are covered by the ePrivacy Directive (EPD) which pre-dates GDPR by 9 years.
GDPR does include one short paragraph which clarifies that where cookies contain data that can identify an individual, this is personal data. So GDPR gave some teeth to the EPD.
and the shift+windows flag key+s seems to work better capturing pop-up messages and drop-down lists. Using windows flag key+V gives the ability to do seerl captures than paste them where/when you want.
But must admit that familiarity means that I still use Paint for quick edits of existing images.
For a moving vehicle, it's mass that matters the most, as you have to accelerate the fuel mass and that costs. Hence why making cars lighter is a key fuel consumption improver.
Agreed, the storage technology and approach (compression, insulation...) will add to the weight. But on something like a train, the volume is less of an issue.
As to Fuel cell efficiency compared to ICE power plants, https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2015/11/f27/fcto_fuel_cells_fact_sheet.pdf
"It's light so the energy density - Joules/kg - is low, also see next point - storage cylinders are heavy."
wrong. Energy per Kg is 3 times higher than gasoline fuels. The fuel-cells are 3 times more efficient than an iCE engine, so in mass terms it's a very good energy store.
Then the storage issue. LPG is kind of scary, methane tanks no better and petrol has a nasty habit of forming dense explosive vapour clouds. Anyone want to drop their lithium batteries in water?
All energy stores have issues. Some are just more familiar than others
I would like to get 3G first, without having to go up to the top of the house, or up the hill into the forest where I get great connectivity (the wonders of rural life, but I will soon have a 1Gb/s fibre connection, work that one out)
Anyway, about the security aspect. Not saying that the following has any technical reality, but the worry is less "Butler with an ear at the door" and more "Manchurian Candidate" (ironically appropriate?). That is, in any box of electronics, it's hard to spot any oddities, and even harder within firmware. I am sure that if you open up any 2 routers from one manufacturer, you will find some difference in components, especially over time and with replacement parts etc. So the paranoia is that all works fine until the day that the special signal is sent, and some zombie buried feature wakes up and drops your comms network into the bin.
Agree. I have a Surface Pro 4, and never got an automated offer to move to 1809. I assumed for a while that there was some hardware driver issue, but nothing listed (searching forums) by other owners that had upgraded.
So I went to the MS site and started the upgrade. Completed in less than an hour (went for a snack, was done when I got back) and only issue was my microphone was not working, though "no issues found" on scanning. Delete device and restart, all OK. The Cloud Clipboard and new screen shot features are very useful.
So why the slow roll out to the one set of devices MS should have done ASAP?
"he Mini and still it was a rather dreadful car, as wet and cold inside as outside, absolutely lethal in snow and sleet in the night on the road among real cars."
Really don't get this comment. In snow the mini classic is quite excellent, with good grip and feedback through the steering so you can tell what is going on. Of course deep snow can be an issue due to the small ground clearance! Screen demist in my current car leaves something to be desired, but the heating levels are great.
When I first moved to Win 10, tried Edge but unusable. Continued to use a mix of IE and Chrome.
However Google's recent efforts to make Chrome use memory and be generally harder to configure made me try Edge again. Now I prefer it and use it as my default, with Chrome for some sites.
IE still needed for some things though....
It could be that the usage statistics will take time to catch up as Edge creeps into wider use. A lot of big companies are only just getting round to Win 10 roll out so that may have an impact.
Default setting for IE is to turn this behaviour off for Internet zone connections, and on for Intranet zone.
May explain why those who have tried the test site did not see anything wrong.
Could still be an issue if you try on a potentially hostile network e.g. hotel, restaurant etc. if the PC decides the SMB connection is local.