Re: Are we shocked?
The IPCC isn't mandated to examine the causes of climate change. It just assumes, without questioning, that man made carbon dioxide emissions are the only cause of climate change. If the Vatican said the correct number of angels on a pin is 7 would you accept that as true? It assumes the existence of angels without questioning it.
If you go into the IPCC report you will find they even admit there is no evidence of extreme weather increasing. It is in Chapter 12:
https://wattsupwiththat.com/ipcc-attributions-climate-and-extreme-weather/
There is no evidence of any increase or decrease, globally or by region, in the frequency, severity or extent of frost, mean precipitation, river floods, heavy precipitation and pluvial floods, landslides, aridity, hydrological drought, agricultural or ecological drought, fire weather or wildfires, mean wind speed, severe wind storms or tornados, tropical cyclones or hurricanes, sand and dust storms, snow glacial or ice sheets, heavy snowfall and ice storms, hail, snow avalanche, relative sea levels, coastal floods, coastal erosion, marine heatwaves, ocean acidity, air pollution weather or radiation at earth’s surface.
And even that is under the absurd RCP8.5 scenario. you do know what the RCP scenarios are don't you?
==
As for computer models - even the head of NASA's climate modelling, Gavin Schmidt, has admitted the computer models are running "too hot" - see his article in Nature magazine May 2022 if this link doesn't work:
https://irp.cdn-website.com/0bdd390b/files/uploaded/NatureGavinSchmidtClimateModels.pdf
Page 2 of that article shows that if you eliminate the more absurd hot models the climate crisis evapoates. (The blue lines on the graph)