Never heard of Substack until now.
After reading this article, I visited front page for the first - and last - time.
AFAICT it's complete tosh.
1109 publicly visible posts • joined 29 May 2016
"... It remains to be seen whether its move into "AI" will maintain that reputation."
I'm reminded of some professor and a team of researchers at a place I used to work (Imperial College, London) who for a decade had been hammering away at theories about antibiotic resistance.
They seem to have got there in the end, but this spring they handed the problem to some AI thing, which figured it out in a couple of days.
I think everybody was impressed. Just the difference in the costs would be staggering, never mind the almost incredible speed of such an achievement.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/clyz6e9edy3o
Yes, hallucinations are a thing. But we're just starting to crawl with all this stuff, let alone walk.
People who know me will tell you that I'll be the last person they'd expect to embrace the latest fad, whatever it is, but my feeling is that the nay-sayers should couch their pronouncements in very well-considered terms, so as not to look like dinosaurs in a few years' time.
"... the amount of energy required to create gravity may well be unfeasibly large."
Not at all. Nowadays we routinely see images from the larger telescopes which demonstrate gravitational lensing.
That's the effect of the gravity of individual photons.
Classically, the gravitational force is G * M1 * M2 / (d*d).
In gravitational lensing, one of M1 and M2 is big - the mass of a galaxy, or a few of them - the other is tiny, the (effective) mass of the photon.
"...suggest "somnolent", which rather accurately describes the current set of Banana Republicans/MAGAts to a tee."
Upvoted for "Banana Republicans". Nice one. The phrase never occurred to me even though for quite a while now I've been saying that the USA seems to be turning into a Banana Republic.
" ... AV vendors selling products which ... work some of the time ..."
For about the last five years I've been measuring the success of over a dozen vendors at spotting malware in our incoming email.
The way it works is that when my own software spots something dangerous, it sends it to one of the multi-vendor scanning sites and logs the results.
I manually check every result.
From just under 8500 tests since early 2021 here are the bald, rough, average percentage success results:
% VENDOR
------------------------------------
83.6 fortinet.com
80.3 cyren.com
76.3 avast.com
71.0 gdatasoftware.com
66.9 kaspersky.com
65.1 bitdefender.com
64.9 escanav.com
60.9 ikarussecurity.com
59.0 sophos.com
51.0 f-secure.com
45.3 drweb.com
43.8 eset.com
17.6 anti-virus.by
13.5 k7computing.com
5.9 f-prot.com
4.3 trendmicro.com
3.8 clamav.net
These results do mask some changes - for example Avast seems to have improved considerably this year - but as you can see, even the best aren't nearly good enough and everything else ranges from mediocre (missing around one in six) to pretty much hopeless in my view (rather worse than missing 19 out of 20). They also show results for pretty basic installations, it's possible to get better results from anything with a bit of (significant, diligent and non-trivial) work.
Despite what the banks, the health services and our governments will try to tell us, if We The People use consumer-grade computing there is no realistic way that we can properly protect ourselves from these threats. Using hardware and software which is far removed from consumer-grade, I protect my nearest and dearest, my own business, and a couple of other businesses. AFAICT more or less everybody else is at great risk - as the pages of El Reg bear witness.
Even with the huge amount of effort that I put into security, I can't give any guarantees. I have never used Internet banking. Given my age, it seems likely that I never will.
I think we're chasing the wrong squirrel here.
The problem isn't that there's insufficient control over source code or whatever.
The problem is that a human being is incapable of writing code which is free of faults.
My prediction - my hope - is that in the not too distant future, no code at all will be written by humans.
Then the human art (not science!) of coding will be consigned to history, along with those of the stonemason and the ostler.
Not until then will I consider installing a banking app.
"In the article it refers to modifying rom. That shouldn't be possible. ... "
Obviously, by definition ROM can't be written.
Clearly they're calling it ROM when is isn't, in fact, ROM at all.
I live in hope of one day meeting the genius who decided that it was a good idea to make what should have been ROM writeable without *also* adding a DIP switch - or even a jumper - to the board.
" ... when a supplier wants to provide ... but the contracts are so hard on the supplier ... "
This happens everywhere.
When a potential customer sent me its terms to sign, and the terms were so onerous that I could easily see them bankrupting me, I told them to take a running jump.
The customer? Local government. Derbyshire County Council in England.
Their terms said that if they bought something from me, and then LATER found that they could have bought it cheaper somewhere else, they could come back to me for the difference.
Suppose they bought it from a bankruptcy auction?
If you agree to something like that, you must be out of your mind or bent.
" ... The US have a memorandum of understanding with Canada to get access to the experience (cost and timing) of building SMRs in Canada and plan to use that to base their own SMR strategy on. ... "
Given the way that Trump has treated Canada lately, what do you suppose that's worth?
" ... Absolutely everything is done by jumping to more-or-less random points in the system code. ... "
Exactly what I did in the late 1970s, when I had to not only do all the data reduction for RadioImmunoAssay, but also spectrum stabilization for (sixteen photomultipliers in) the scintillation counters in the instrument on the bench. A 6800, 2K of ROM (there wasn't an unused byte) and 256 bytes of RAM. Data input via DMA. Needs must.
Cast your minds back to the early 1900s.
Suddenly there were lots of motor vehicles on the public roads in the hands of completely untrained users.
Result: carnage.
There was no Highway Code. Here in the UK we had to wait until 1931 for that.
There were no driving licences. Where I live, it wasn't until 1933 that you had to pass an examination of competence to get one.
There were no Ministry of Transport vehicle tests. Believe it or not they didn't come in until 1960 - which was several years after my first three motorcycles were built - and even then it was voluntary until the Powers That Be realized with dismay how large a proportion of the vehicles were failing the tests.
Gradually we started to get to grips with putting potentially dangerous equipment in the hands of a public by and large incompetent to handle it. Although there's still carnage, there's a bit less of it.
It took half a century.
So here we go again, putting yet more potentially dangerous equipment into the hands of a population utterly incapable of operating it safely.
Governments, heaven help us, are even making it MANDATORY for things like taxation. They seem, in their cluelessness, to think that it might save them money.
This is collective insanity. OF COURSE it has caused the shedding of tears by countless people and organizations. How could anyone ever have expected otherwise?
When will we ever learn?
When will we ever learn?
"He could, but he wouldn't. Even though Pooh is a proper dictator, he's still more fair minded, intelligent, and considered in his actions than the illiterate Orange Buffoon."
He could, but he wouldn't. Even though Pooh is a proper dictator, he's still more fair minded, intelligent, and considered in his actions than the illiterate, aggressive, arbitrary, arrogant, bullying, conceited, corrupt, dictatorial, felonious, hypocritical, narcissistic, pompous, pretentious and downright deranged Orange Buffoon.
FTFY. :)
"...a really bad day when lawd knows how much EM energy arrives along those miles long interconnection cables."
To be fair, thesedays most of the miles long interconnections are made of glass fibres, which tend to be relatively unfazed by EM pulses.
Not that I'm in any way playing down the risks to present-day equipment. During the Carrington Event, some telegraph operators were communicating over those miles long battery-powered interconnection cables for a couple of hours -- without the batteries connected.
But I'm puzzled how AI could possibly be expected to predict something like the Carrington Event when it's been trained on data which contains nothing remotely resembling such an event. It seems like trying to predict a tsunami by looking at the tides. I can't help but feel that the effort would be better directed towards modelling the processes going on inside the sun.
"... an extremely sophisticated attack ..." Cupertino said.
The more they talk about "extremely sophisticated" attacks the less I believe them.
Making use of an out-of-bounds write doesn't sound especially sophisticated to me, but I guess we'll see if and when they release some detail. Or the criminals do.
"... the stock market has devolved into devising new ways to skim money off the top ..."
AFAICT the main reason for the existence of stock markets has *always* been to skim money off the top.
I was party to a Public Offering in the 1980s. Even back then, after watching the goings-on for a few months it seemed to me that the object of the exercise was nothing to do with expanding my business. Apart from the fact that it got lumbered with unbelievable bills from Big Name Accountants and for people staying at The Connaught and The Ritz doing "due diligence", the business was entirely incidental to the real purpose of the exercise which was to bilk the punters on the Denver exchange. The sales projections were pure fiction; to meet them would have required me to buy more of some of the major components in my products than the global supply chain at that time was capable of providing. It left a very nasty taste which still lingers.
[quote]
"It is very difficult, for example, to quantify the value that Microsoft brings indirectly, including ... high levels of security and trust,"
Microsoft brings high level of security and trust? ...
[/quote]
Yeah, that bit about "...high levels of security and trust..." must have been a quote from Truth Social or something.
What's the average number of critical vulnerabilities in a Patch Tuesday? And what's the trend in that number?
Somebody must have all the data, but from the sample immediately and easily available to me it doesn't exactly look inspiring:
https://www.theregister.com/2019/06/11/patch_tuesday/ [...88 CVE-listed flaws...]
https://www.theregister.com/2019/07/10/patch_tuesday_july/ [For Microsoft, July brings fixes for a total of 78 CVE-listed vulnerabilities.]
https://www.theregister.com/2019/08/13/windows_rdp_patch_tuesday/ [Among the 93 CVE-listed flaws patched this month are four particularly serious remote-code execution bugs...]
https://www.theregister.com/2019/09/10/patch_tuesday_abode_sap/ [and the kitchen sink...]
https://www.theregister.com/2019/10/08/october_patch_tuesday/
https://www.theregister.com/2019/12/10/patch_tuesday_december_2019/
https://www.theregister.com/2020/01/14/patch_tuesday_january_2020/
https://www.theregister.com/2020/03/11/patch_tuesday_march_smbv3/ [No patch available yet!]
https://www.theregister.com/2020/04/14/april_patch_tuesday/
https://www.theregister.com/2020/07/15/july_2020_patch_tuesday/ [Windows DNS servers (mostly also domain controllers). Huge issue. Been there ~20 years.]
https://www.theregister.com/2020/08/11/patch_tuesday_august/
https://www.theregister.com/2020/09/08/patch_tuesday_september/ [Horrifying, but slightly better than typical.]
https://www.theregister.com/2020/10/13/microsoft_patch_tuesday/
https://www.theregister.com/2020/11/11/patch_tuesday_updates/ [One hundred and twelve Microsoft security patches this Tuesday.]
https://www.theregister.com/2020/12/08/patch_tuesday_fixes/ [Quite a selection.]
https://www.theregister.com/2021/01/12/patch_tuesday_fixes/ (...again).
https://www.theregister.com/2021/04/13/patch_tuesday_april/
https://www.theregister.com/2021/05/11/microsoft_patch_tuesday_exchange_hyperv/
https://www.theregister.com/2021/06/09/june_patch_tuesday/
https://www.theregister.com/2021/07/14/patch_tuesday/
https://www.theregister.com/2021/08/10/microsoft_patch_tuesday/ [This made the news - only 44 vulnerabilities this month!]
https://www.theregister.com/2021/10/12/microsoft_patch_tuesday/ [This month: 1 low severity, 68 important, 2 critical.]
https://www.theregister.com/2021/11/09/microsoft_spreads_patch_tuesday_joy/ [55 important vulnerabilites, including 6 critical, patched on tuesday 9th November 2021.]
https://www.theregister.com/2022/01/12/january_patch_tuesday/
https://www.theregister.com/2022/01/13/microsoft_patch_tuesday_titsup/
https://www.theregister.com/2022/01/18/patching_patch_tuesday/
https://www.theregister.com/2022/03/09/microsoft_patch_tuesday/
https://www.theregister.com/2022/04/13/microsoft_patch_tuesday/ [Over 100 fixes including ten critical vulnerabilities in this month's Patch Tuesday.]
https://www.theregister.com/2022/05/11/microsoft_patch_tuesday/ [Only seventy-odd this month, seven critical.]
https://www.theregister.com/2022/06/15/microsoft_patch_tuesday/
https://www.theregister.com/2022/07/12/microsoft_july_patch_tuesday/ [June's zero-day fault gets patched in July...]
https://www.theregister.com/2022/08/09/august_patch_tuesday_microsoft/
https://www.theregister.com/2022/09/13/microsoft_patch_tuesday_september_2022/
https://www.theregister.com/2022/10/11/october_patch_tuesday/
https://www.theregister.com/2022/11/09/microsoft_november_2022_patch_tuesday/
https://www.theregister.com/2022/12/14/microsoft_december_patch_tuesday/
https://www.theregister.com/2022/12/14/microsoft_patch_tuesday_vm/
https://www.theregister.com/2023/01/11/patch_tuesday_january_2023/ [98 vulnerabilities patched in the first Patch Tuesday of the year - some of them already under exploit.]
https://www.theregister.com/2023/03/14/microsoft_patch_tuesday/
https://www.theregister.com/2023/04/11/april_patch_tuesday_ransomware/
https://www.theregister.com/2023/05/09/microsoft_may_patch_tuesday/ [This month, a relatively low number of fixes: only 38.]
https://www.theregister.com/2023/07/11/microsoft_patch_tuesday/ [One hundred and thirty vulnerabilities addressed - but a zero-day one-click compromise isn't.]
https://www.theregister.com/2023/08/08/microsoft_intel_august_patch_tuesday/ [Note the bypass of the bypass of the bypass of the patch of the patch of the patch!]
https://www.theregister.com/2023/10/10/october_2023_patch_tuesday/ [Microsoft on Tuesday issued more than 100 security updates...]
https://www.theregister.com/2023/11/15/november_2023_patch_tuesday/ [...fixes for about 60 vulnerabilities – including three that have already been found and abused in the wild.]
https://www.theregister.com/2023/12/13/december_2023_patch_tuesday/ [Microsoft: 36. Adobe: 212. Yep, that's in one month.]
https://www.theregister.com/2024/01/09/january_patch_tuesday/ [A relatively calm start to the year for Microsoft, only 49 vulnerabilities this month, including 12 RCE, two critical...]
https://www.theregister.com/2024/02/14/patch_tuesday_feb_2024/ [73 vulnerabilities this month, FIVE critical and under active exploitation.]
https://www.theregister.com/2024/05/14/microsoft_may_patch_tuesday/ [60 Windows CVEs]
https://www.theregister.com/2024/06/12/june_patch_tuesday/ [Only 47 Microsoft security issues this Tuesday.]
https://www.theregister.com/2024/07/10/july_2024_patch_tuesday/ [Tuesday's software updates address more than 130 Microsoft CVEs.]
https://www.theregister.com/2024/10/08/patch_tuesday_october_2024/ [...this one is a doozy. Microsoft has delivered 117 patches...]
https://www.theregister.com/2025/01/15/patch_tuesday_january_2025/ [...three under-attack privilege-escalation flaws in its Hyper-V hypervisor, plus plenty more...]
https://www.theregister.com/2025/04/08/patch_tuesday_microsoft/ [...11 critical issues in its code to fix. Redmond delivered fixes for more than 120 flaws this month...]
https://www.theregister.com/2025/06/10/microsoft_patch_tuesday_june/ [Just 66 fixes - some under active attack - this Tuesday.]
https://www.theregister.com/2025/08/12/august_patch_tuesday/ [...111 problems in its products, a dozen of which are deemed critical...]
The Hanford site at one stage was dumping kiloCuries of radioactive waste every week into the Hanford river:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hanford_Site#Environmental_concerns
The Savannah river's ecology is currently severely stressed by the toxic wastes which are caused by the human population:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Savannah_River#Ecology
So putting things in perspective, when very typical soils around our houses measure of the order of a microcurie per cubic metre:
https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/Legacy/TN/nbstechnicalnote1139.pdf
I hardly think that finding three microcuries in a wasp nest is a big story.
There's more than that in my dad's old alarm clock, and a *lot* more in my smoke detector.
In this very badly researched and highly skewed opinion piece we read
"... We may be making advances toward fusion energy, but £2.5 billion is a big ask for a country buried in debt..."
I calculate that the UK spent roughly £40 billion last year on energy.
And apparently its population spent a little more than that on fashion and accessories.
So maybe not such a big ask.
This has been bugging me for a while now, so here's as good a place as any.
Here in the north of England, 'Trump' in colloquial use means 'Fart'.
The word has always made me a little uncomfortable, but this year that discomfort has grown substantially because the current president of the USA is so obviously deranged.
"I have a new comparison when discussing the idiotic idea of playing the lottery ..."
At work, years ago, the usual chaotic effort to pick the week's lottery numbers was in progress.
The idea was a different person would choose the numbers each week.
For some unknown reason that week they asked me to choose the numbers.
Not knowing much about the lottery, but more than most about numbers, I wrote down
1234567
on the sheet of paper and handed it over.
"Well they're not going to win!"
"I know", I said, "but it's obvious they're not going to win and they have the same chance as any other numbers you might choose".
The sales manager was flabberghasted. "Do you really believe that?", he said.
"I don't have to believe it. I can prove it." I said.
Nevertheless they wouldn't use my numbers and they never asked me again.
"I know, let's have a system where everyone on the planet can connect whatever they like to everything else on the planet, and use it to move money about and stuff like that.
We can bolt some security on later if it turns out that we need to."
How far would I get with that pitch at your average financial organization?
But it's seems to be what most of us have done.
It's insane.